Dems Launch WAR on Independent Media As Trump Makes BIG MOVES On Border - SF491
01:03:43 Share

Hello there, you awakening wonders. Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand. I reckon this is what's going on. There's an autopsy as to why the election went the way it did. Wherever you're watching this, if you're watching this on YouTube, where we'll be for the next 15 minutes, let me know in the comments and chat.

Why did the election pan out this way? Was it A, because people are sick and tired of the establishment? Is it B, because Trump played the media game better? Is it C, because Latino people are racist now? Or should I say Latinx people are racist now? Let me know what you think about that. And while the corpse of the 2024 election continues to be picked over, what we want to bring your attention to is

are the global issues that we believe are at the heart of it, at the heart of the election result. There's a brilliant story coming out of my country where you can hear a public official, former advisor to the Labour Party, that's our version of the Democrat Party, saying the world doesn't need farmers anymore. They're shut farmers down.

This is one of the key themes of globalism, if you ask me, the disempowering of ordinary people until they're reduced to a kind of surf class. And then a technological feudalism can be introduced with new citizen management technology that will mean that any...

any point, your movements can be shut down, your medical records can be accessed, your ability to travel foreclosed, your children turned into chimney sweeps. I made the last one up just because, you know, I'm British and child labour laws are different over here. We'll be talking a lot about Trump's diet and we'll be talking about how the legacy media covers Bobby Kennedy. We're also going to look at the subject of migration and do

people believe in democracy? Because whatever Trump is saying he's going to do now and the appointments that he's making, are they, and this is a question for you guys, let me know in the comments and chat, are they in alignment with the way that he campaigned? Is he appointing the kind of people that he said he would appoint? Is he talking about the same kind of policies? What about mass deportation? I mean, Trump said that

There were going to be mass deportations, I suppose, didn't they? So should we be surprised if the infrastructure is put in place for mass deportation? However, we feel about that. If we believe in democracy, if we believe in government by the ballot box and what you want to see, I suppose, is the government enacting the policies that they campaigned on and outside of this election and outside of your country.

It's just a common theme. You're polled continually during the campaign. We're going to do this. We're going to give you that. Then they get into government and they're exactly the same as the last lot. Let's watch how it unfolds. This is something that caught my eye over on X. It's AOC asking people to tell her what

Podcast they listen to if they vote for Trump. Hello, Kimberley1965. Good afternoon. Jefferson Fofo, we should invade England. Do you know what?

Maybe that's... There would have been a time where I would have said, how dare you? The Queen. But now, you know, the Queen, God rest her soul, she's gone. Trump will do as he says he'll do, says Lisa Oboe. Jane Norris, 2028. I'm single. I love Russell Brand. Any single ladies who want a man? We're not... Hold on a minute. I'm facilitating this. It's not dating. We're not...

Well, actually, you can do what you want in there. Yeah, it's free speech. If you're watching us on YouTube, get over to Rumble. People are dating one another over there. And if you're in Rumble and you want to join us for a deeper look into theology and metaphysics behind my recent transformation, join us for break bread. Tomorrow, I'll be streaming live with my teacher, Jay John, who's the man who I do Bible study with. There's some brilliant Christians who have helped me.

Oh, since I've been converted, since I've come to our Lord and Saviour, Jeff Cavins, brilliant Catholic scholar, Father Mike Schmitz, although I've never spoken to him directly, I listen to his content all the time. Jonathan Rumi, he played our Lord and Saviour, my local parish priest,

Father Dave, although he's Church of England, so not officially a Padre in that sense. But also J. John, Nicky Gumbel, Bear Grylls. And I want to talk to all of these people about Christianity because I reckon...

The kind of Christianity that interests me is not sit there quietly Christianity, but it's the kind of Christianity that's going to change the world. I'll be talking about the book of Acts with J. John. I know I will. All right, let's get into politics. Why do you think that AOC wants to know the podcasts that you listen to? Are they, is it?

Is it going to be internment camps or is it just that they want to emulate a successful election strategy? Let me know in the comments and chat. Here's AOC. Which podcasts are you listening to? Which accounts are you subscribing to? I'm interested. Like...

Could you go there and say, Russell Brand, we listen to Russell Brand, stay free with Russell Brand. He's a fine, upstanding Christian man. He may have had challenges in his life. There's no question about that. But he is born again. He is forgiven. And you should go on there, AOC, to talk about that. You might get some interesting insights from a person who's very interested in the liberal philosophy and the aspects of social progressivism that seem to be grounded in good virtue and how they are

playing out and how they're being utilised to facilitate authoritarianism. So yeah, get in there now if you would. I guess that's on X that she said that. So pop over there. Get X open. We have X open right now so that we can... Let's have a look at where we are on X. Can we have a look at my X feed? Let me see where I am. I just want to... Right, that's it. This is nice. And can we do it... Is it split? Is it pip for the people? Yes, good. Right, that's good. All right.

So, yeah, okay, that's good. And also remember we should subscribe to one that's not got adverts on it. Do you remember that bit when I said that bit? All right, because that'd be easier. There's Candace Owens celebrating her three million subscribers. There's Ryan Clark says he has no plan to respect Trump. Here's a bodybuilder taking a Pilates class. Hello, there it is. X, a lot of free speech.

of all varieties. Glenn Beck, I believe that a real Donald Trump is letting the Senate vote without influence. However, the minute whomever they choose doesn't move his agenda forward. J.D. Vance will take the Senate like John Adams did as VP.

There you go. The conversation continues. Elon Musk reposted in a documentary himself, becoming multi-planetary will greatly increase the lifespan of our civilization and is the critical next step to becoming multi-stellar. Do you agree with that? Incidentally, come back to me full screen, if you will, Isaac. It's interesting to dip your toe into X for a moment. See, I suppose...

My spiritual purview is that we can't look to materialism and technology to resolve our spiritual problems. No, we can't continue to advance down the path of trying to solve Earth's problem by enthroning mankind. There is a different king that needs to be enthroned. We are.

at the beginning of something magnificent. I really, really believe that. And I think a genius like Elon Musk, there's no question that his power is going to shape the Earth's future, particularly after this election result. But I truly believe, and I'd love to know what you think. Let me know in the comments and chat. Unless we...

aspire to and reach a spiritual plane as described in scripture, we will just annihilate this dimension. We'll annihilate this realm. Materialism can never solve spiritual problems. That's just my little perspective on this matter. Let's have a look at my endorsement, Ain't Worth a Penny. And Kamala Harris was paying

Good money. Thanks, Maxi Billions. Yeah. Thank you very much. That's a fine endorsement there. Kamala Harris and her campaign were paying good money for celebrities and I never got offered paychecks.

Penny one, not penny one for an endorsement, which I would have struggled to give. Let's have a look at Fox listing the Kamala campaign spending on celebrities. And let me know in the comments and chat, was it worth it? Was it worth it? You awakened wonders over there on locals. Was it worth it? Those of you watching us in the room.

RumbleCham. Talking to you, NegligentBanana and Jude Syke and WeUsedToBeFree48 and Joe's Dog, all the people I love there in the Awake and Wonder chat. And let me know if you're going to be joining me for my conversation with Jay John tomorrow. Get your questions ready for him. Guileslayer, let me know what you think about the...

value for money that the Kamala campaign got for the endorsements of celebrities like Megan Thee Stallion. I think Beyonce was one. Katy Perry, I figure that she was endorsing. Let me know what you think. Over these numbers, $10 million for Beyonce to step up and back Kamala Harris publicly. $5 million for Megan Thee Stallion, $3 million for Lizzo.

1.8 million for M&M's. I mean, is that normally how it goes? It's an interesting ratio. Like that's the scale. M&M is only worth, you get two M&M's for a Lizzo. Grow up, grow up. You get five Lizzo's for a Beyonce. Is that right? My maths isn't absolutely fantastic there. But also isn't it a paid for endorsement

Questionable. Anyway, I suppose you could make that point about all advertising, I guess. I mean, is that normally how it goes? You spend 20 million, you get yourself in debt to try to get a bunch of rich celebrities on stage? I've never seen that. Maybe I'm ignorant of the fact. It's public appearances, isn't it? It's their public appearance riders, probably. And that's probably what it costs to get in places. That's why...

I guess, you know, there's a report in the Oprah Winfrey received a million dollars. But Oprah Winfrey, when she was sort of doorstepped by TMZ, when I didn't receive any money. And I suppose that could be true. What's possible, I suppose, is that there are expenses. But what it indicates to me, and I think you'll be able to find tape of me saying this before the election, is that the world has radically changed. And even though on one level it looks like it doesn't.

immediately strike you that Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson are this new vanguard because they are both and seem like they're for dads, like sort of middle-aged kids.

dads, but their credibility and celebrity is not built upon singing glistening songs and strutting and dancing and prancing. Their credibility is built upon hours of reporting. You can watch Tucker Carlson for hours talking about any subject. You can watch Joe Rogan for hours talking about any subject. So when they endorse a political candidate, it has more

More value, more weight, more heft. Maybe I'm ignorant of the fact, but wow. Please, if you don't mind, dear. OK, here's Bernie Sanders saying that the Democrats vilified him when he went on Joe Rogan. Yeah, I remember that. And I remember when I first went on Joe Rogan.

Like, people were saying he was a gateway to the right. They said he may not be right wing. Like, you know, and firstly, packed into that is the idea that right wing is in itself negative. All right. So, you know...

mark that and park that. Then it was like saying, it's a gateway that could lead you to all sorts of people like Alex Jones and other extraordinary right wing figures. Well, you know, it seems that their assessment was wrong. Now it's apparent, plain, evident and obvious that Joe Rogan is the new mainstream. His endorsement is worth a thousand Megan Thee Stallions and Taylor Swifts and Oprah's because the world has changed. And that's

somewhat due to his personal brilliance. And it's also due to the way the world has ordered and the way that people receive and read media now. Centralized institutional media cannot deliver to you because they are beholden to both financial and commercial interests that mean that they will necessarily lie to you at some point. I can tell you the moment when it really significantly changed in one name, two names.

Julian Assange. That was the pivotal moment where even the vanguard media became unreliable in the common colloquial Bulgarian parlance. They shat themselves because Julian Assange was taking press seriously.

freedom and investigative journalism to the place where it was always meant to lead. What are these powerful people actually doing? Are they telling us the truth? Let's expose the reality. Assange did that when it came to American foreign policy, actions in Iraq, corruption within the Democrat Party.

He did it everywhere because obviously, you know, he was just receiving information from a variety of sources and publishing it and leading the news agenda. He had affiliates and partnerships all across legacy media. And then, you know, in my country, the police and the deep state turned up at The Guardian, which used to be, as I understand it, a pretty legit newspaper propaganda wing now, propaganda arm of centralist WEF.

using various ideas that are built around virtue that will ultimately be deployed to legitimize control. Like they'll talk about things that are good, like vulnerable people are being exploited or the planet's vulnerable and is being exploited and therefore grant this authority to these people. Like, you know, that's, it will always lead to control. Now,

They bricked it when the deep state turned up at their offices and burst into private rooms and opened safes and demanded drives. The media has never recovered from that. Let me know in the comments and chat if you think that Julian Assange was the moment it all changed. Assange, Manning, Snowden.

Because of technology, information that you never would have had access to before was exposed. And the state since then, the state and media complex have been scrambling to resolve the problems that were revealed then. How do we legitimize censorship and control? How do we once again make people believe that the New York Times is reliable, that the BBC is reliable when it's become evident that what they are is

is the propaganda arm of the state. They can't advocate for you. They can advocate for ideas that seem like they're talking about vulnerable people in order to turn people against one another. They, to generate hatred, to tell you that your neighbors are racist and awful and hate you and to stoke fears and tensions. But if you want the perpetrators

moment to understand their true nature. It was a long moment indeed. It was a two, three year period called the COVID pandemic when we saw them lie and amplify, where we saw them conceal and censor. That's who you're dealing with. Remember that. Remember that when they're talking about war. Remember that when they're talking about peace. Remember that when they're smearing people. Remember

So there you go, baby. That's just some of my thoughts. Let's see Bernie Sanders, though, sort of like they're all coming out of the I'm going to say they were coming out of the woodwork like they're worms. But people are willing now to have a conversation that they weren't willing to have a little while ago. If you watch this on YouTube, we'll be here for a minute longer. Then we'll be exclusively on Rumble because Rumble are providing communities and technology for free speech. Let me know how significant you think Rumble were in the election of

Joe Rogan, very popular podcaster. He endorsed Donald Trump in the final days of the election. Four years ago, you went on his podcast. You got a lot of blowback for doing that and for touting that he endorsed you. So is this the kind of example of Democrats perhaps shunning or vilifying people who don't totally agree with them?

Yeah, I think that's fair enough. Look, you can have an argument with Rogan, agree with him, disagree with him, but what's the problem going on in those shows?

It's hard for me to understand that. So I think we've got to get it. And clearly, you have an alternative media out there, a lot of podcasts that have millions and millions of viewers. Get on the show. Disagree with you here. I agree with you there. I don't see a problem in doing that. And you're right. I got vilified by some of the Democratic establishment because I went on Rogan's show. Now a lot of other people are doing just that.

Yeah, they wanted to cancel Joe Rogan, didn't they? If they coulda, they woulda. They tried to during the Ivermectin moment. They would replace...

all of the voices in independent media if they could with advocates for their globalist centralist message did you see there was a good charlie kirk post as a matter of fact where he said like the left are now looking for their own version of joe rogan they had their own version of joe rogan it was joe rogan joe rogan voted for obama twice and was a bernie sanders supporter but they vilified him and as i said to you i remember that from when i was going on there the first time but i'm still basically an

actor then being in Hollywood movies and stuff, like people were like, this is Joe Rogan. It might be a bit dodgy, but now you've got to understand it. That's how it works. Instead of talking about the issues, just vilify the people that are operating in that space. It just seems ridiculous to me that people are continuing to try to demonize

Trump supporters to demonize 71 million voters or however many it ultimately was to rather than have the conversations about, well, what do you want from America? And that's what we're going to be talking about in the next 40 minutes. We're going to be talking about deportation and migration. We're going to be talking about nutrition and we're going to be talking about censorship. So we're leaving you. If you're watching us on YouTube, start the countdown and join us over on Rumble. Click the

the link in the description. Get on over there. We're going to have a quick word from our partners at BioOptimizers right now. Here's their message. Click the link. Get over. We can't continue to deliver this groundbreaking, world-shaking content without you, who we love, obviously, and

our partners. Today, it's Bioptimizers. Magnesium Breakthrough, in particular, from Bioptimizers, a true game changer in the quest for a better night's sleep. You sleeping okay? Unbelievably, I'm sleeping fantastically well. Prophetic dreams, clear visions. Can all of that be due to Bioptimizers' Magnesium Breakthrough? Well, they've got a Black Friday mega sale on

Right now, it's lasting throughout the entire month of November. The biggest discount you can get and amazing gifts with purchase are available only on my page, biooptimizers.com forward slash brand with a code brand.

brand the code brand this black friday choose your health and wellness over unnecessary frivolous objects head over to bio optimizers.com forward slash brand and enter the code brand at the checkout 25 off simple as that right let's get back to this shall we kg whistle in the rumble chat get him to the greek is one of russell's best movies yes it was stroke the furry war

That was some good stuff. That was some good stuff. We've got some brilliant conversation coming over the next hour. We're going to be talking about nutrition and the war of attrition and how the propaganda state undermines outspoken voices that speak out against big agriculture, big food and big pharma. And no one does that more than Bobby Kennedy. Let's have a quick look at what's going on over on X. Have a look at this.

post from someone called King Randall. I did you see this already? He posted himself as this black geezer. He posted himself saying that he was supporting Kamala. And then he made a video saying he was supporting Trump. And he said that when he made the video saying he's supporting Kamala, like people were like, Oh, like Trump supporters in the comments, he says, well, like, Oh, well, you know, you'll wake up one day. And then, uh, like, but when he said he was supporting Trump, people were like, ah,

Damn you! Damn you to hell! And do you, let me know in the comments and chat, do you notice that a lot more vociferous opposition and condemnation and judgment from the left than from the right? Because I've got to tell you, when I first started publicly questioning politics, it was way back in about 2014. I talked about a variety of subjects. I talked about British foreign policy.

Hey, Jack Pozzo, Melania Trump declines to attend traditional White House meeting with Jill Biden. Is that good? Is that good or is that bad? The Jake Paul Tyson fight, that's going to be a moment for all of us. Yeah, come back to me full screen. One thing I can tell you, right, is when I first started talking about politics in my country, this is before the advent of independent media with the power and ability that it has now.

So I started saying stuff like, what's the point of voting if both political parties are basically the same and are controlled by financial interests and deep state power? Right. I started to say stuff like that.

in my country that were of the right, like the Telegraph, were kind of like, this Russell Brand, he's got a bit of a nerve, don't you think? And they questioned me and were even somewhat sceptical and judgmental. But the left, my God, the BBC and The Guardian, there was like a kind of what I might call a demonic damn

the revelation of something insidious, cruel and cold that I've never forgotten. And I'm beginning to think that masked behind all their declarations of virtue is something akin to evil, even if they don't know it themselves.

Here's the Axios founder admitting to NBC that the mainstream media lost to independent voices. How long is it before MSNBC are saying the problem was MSNBC? You've always been sort of the leading edge of where media is going with Politico. Now with Axios, you understand the environment so well. How do Democrats and frankly, how does legacy media need to change the way it thinks about getting information? I mean, a lot of the voters who went out and voted for Donald Trump that

So many people are wondering what happened here. They're not watching, frankly, this show. They're not reading The New York Times. They're not consuming media that way. And the Trump campaign found those voters where they live. So how do Democrats need to change the way they communicate to voters if you think that's part of the problem?

For sure. I mean, I think all of us have to come to grips with legacy media is just not as important as it thinks it is. It is to you. It is to me. That's a relatively small group of people who rely on us for their information. And you have to go into the world as it is not as you wish it to be. And basically, the way people get information is shattered into 20, 30 different pieces. And so if you just look empirically at the numbers,

Joe Rogan's more important than any of us. He just has a much bigger, hyper-connected audience that listens to his every word. So maybe listen to Joe Rogan and kind of understand, like, what is he talking about? What are the guests that he has on? What are the issues that they care about? Realize that the gravity of right-wing discourse is now taking place on X. It's not Fox. X is what matters. Elon Musk is now, I wrote about this yesterday, our

arguably the most powerful civilian in the history of the country. He controls information flow. He controls multiple businesses. He has the president's ear. He's going to be in charge of some newfangled organization to gut government spending. We've not seen a person with that kind of clout across those sectors. But where his real power comes from is X.

People thought he was an idiot when he bought X because he lost a lot of money. He's got a lot of money. And now he happens to have the most powerful platform on the right. And politics is downstream from information. And there's just a whole new information ecosystem out there. So for us, for you, for Democrats, for Republicans, you have to understand that you now are going to have to basically navigate 20 or 30 different parts of the ecosystem if you want to connect with the American people who vote.

Oh, and how much is butter again? Look at Joe Scarborough staring on, baffled at the brave new world that he's awoken to. We may not yet know how a Trump administration will govern, but for me, it's amazing to be having conversations about censorship. If you think about how things were during the pandemic, it's brilliant to see legacy media recognizing the yawning chasm that opens before them as,

all of their proposed virtue, all of their sickly signified pretense

at power and care, tumbles down into a canyon, leaves them exposed and bears what they are and ever were, self-interested propagandists. And I mean that with a good degree of respect and concern because there's none of us perfect. And I reckon self-interest motivates a lot of my actions as well. Probably yours. We're human beings. That's why decentralization is so important in independent media.

is a form of decentralization. If you don't like what I'm saying on Rumble, you can go and look at what I know Glenn Greenwald's saying or Crowder or as hundreds of thousands of people are, Bongino. You can look at a variety of people and you can be part of a conversation. You no longer have to be mangled and wrangled into contortionist holds of politics

ideas that don't suit you and that you don't believe in. What is there in the past of our kind and our species that would suggest we should yield to anything other than the highest principle and the highest power? And when the state wants to subvert and own that space, when the state wants to own your mind, wants to

own your consciousness, wants to direct your actions, telling you all the while that like a kind of God, they care for you and they're trying to do the right thing. And you might not understand their judgment, but it's all for the best. You have to recognize that they're just like us. They're flawed and failing. And it's perhaps no coincidence that the person that succeeded most efficiently in this space is someone who one of my personal observations of him would be

authenticity and integrity. Joe Rogan just talked about stuff he cares about, hunting, nutrition during the pandemic. Oh, this is a health issue, isn't it? Shouldn't people be out exercising? Are we sure these vaccines work?

Those things led him into the ire and damnation of an establishment that may not have been conscious of this fact, but they were losing control and they were desperately trying to retain it. And they'll do whatever it takes to keep control. Man, do I know all about that in my own small way. But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. If you're watching us on YouTube now, remember, turn on.

on the notification bell and subscribe to our channel. If you're watching us on Rumble, where you should be, ensure that you get involved in the conversation, but don't spam and be repetitive because you have got free speech, but you are not free to be boring, baby. And if you're not an awakened wonder yet, become one because tomorrow we will be live streaming with J. John, who I do Bible studies with and we'll be talking about a variety of things. I want to talk about the glory of the book of Acts.

Now, J.D. Vance has warned that the U.S. may withdraw from NATO if the EU keeps censoring people all the time. I know about censorship because I was subject to censorship from all these groups like CRISP and Logically AI who were working in conjunction with the government and legacy media to create all sorts of problems for outspoken and independent voices. Now, J.D. Vance is overreacting.

offering a warning. Now, whatever you think about Trump and this burgeoning Trump administration, surely the principles of free speech are indefatigable and undeniable, allowing us all a field and forum to settle our disputes with ideas and open communication. A fight that the old establishment doesn't want to have because they know they will lose that battle. The leader, I forget exactly which official it was within the European Union,

Thierry Breton, European Union, but sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, we're going to arrest you if you platform Donald Trump, who, by the way, is the likely next president of the United States. So what America should be saying is, oh, if NATO wants us to continue supporting them and NATO wants us to continue to be a good participant in this military alliance, why don't you respect American values and respect free speech?

Excuse me, it's insane that we would support a military alliance if that military alliance isn't going to be pro-free speech. I think we can do both, but we've got to say American power comes with certain strings attached. One of those is respect free speech, especially in our European allies. Like, look, I'm not going to go to some backwoods country and tell them how to live their lives, but European countries should theoretically share American values, especially about some very basic things like free speech.

So are the members of the Trump administration going to govern based on their mandate? Let me know in the comments and chat what you think about that. Will this consortium of mavericks that include figures like Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk's Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy be able to influence politics?

Donald Trump. And in particular, for now, let's look at the subject of nutrition, because Donald Trump famously, he likes the junk food, don't he? He likes the McDonald's and the KFC. Bobby Kennedy, I imagine if he was given free reign, would probably shut down McDonald's and KFC. Well, you know, what would you do? What would you do? I mean, who don't like them delicious vanilla milkshakes? Them apple pies are too damn hot. I love a happy meal. But

Imagine this, I suppose what you probably look at is, are they given sort of like weird favorable tax relationships? Most of them are franchises, aren't they? I don't know what the policy is, but certainly people should know that eating that stuff ain't good for you. Certainly, should the government be doing everything possible to ensure that people eat good, locally sourced, grown and reared food? Should the government be doing that? Is that part of their purview?

Do you think that you can have true freedom if you don't have access to all of the information? So how will Trump, the McDonald's loving and ever vital new president of the United States and Bobby Kennedy, a man who seems to be opposed to big food, corporatism and toxic food,

govern. Here's an amusing conversation where Bobby Kennedy reveals that when you hang with Trump, the only foods you're offered is like KFC and McDonald's and all that kind of stuff. And you know that Bobby Kennedy is working pretty closely with Callie and Casey Means and people that are saying that the disease crisis in America is a metabolic one in so much as if we exercise more, if we eat better, if we spend time outside, if we eat whole foods, then we would live better

healthier lives. Now, there's economic implications, isn't there, to all of that? That would mean that whole and healthy foods would have to become more accessible so that they weren't so expensive. It would mean that there'd have to be more farms, not less farms. So what does it mean when big

agriculture and peculiar billionaire influences are acquiring land. What does it mean when across the world farmers are protesting, whether that's in Sri Lanka or Germany or your country? Is there a globalist attempt to get control of food?

So if we want to live in a healthy world, surely we got to eat healthy food. Let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with that. And if that is going to be a policy that's going to be instituted, what's that going to mean for farmers? Surely it's going to mean more organic farmers, more local produce at a price that's affordable. Is it going to mean that or am I crazy? Let me know in the comments and chat. Let's have a look.

at Bobby Kennedy talking about the filthy food that Donald Trump eats and we'll work out together whether in government you will be able to reconcile Trump's own love of the sugary, salty, filthy processed seed oils and policies that enable small farmers in particular to make a good living from their produce. And what's the role of us as individuals in all that? So many questions. The stuff that he eats is...

is really like bad. It's not campaign food is always bad, but the food that goes onto that airplane is like just poison. It's all, they, you have a choice between, you don't have the choice. You're either given KFC or a big max. That's a big, that's like when you're lucky and then you,

The rest of the stuff is, I consider, kind of inedible. But I was eating it. And then he eats Diet Coke. I saw it. I was with Dana White the other day, who is really good, great for my campaign. He was a huge, huge supporter. He's very close to Trump. They've had a relationship for 20 years through UFC. He said during that time, sometimes he'll sit through a fight with Trump.

And he's five hours in the fight. He has never seen Trump drink a glass of water. Yeah, exactly. Just like sodas and Diet Coke or whatever. On Diet Coke. But he has this extraordinary energy. The last day we were with him, he was up 48 hours. So when he gave his speech,

acceptance speech he had been up 48 hours and um literally 48 hours with no sleep and uh you know i'm i'm 70 i feel like i have a lot of endurance but um i you know overnights at this point my wife killed me i could do that a lot when i was a kid but he does it all the time

Hmm. How's this going to play out in policy? Donald Trump seems to be a biological anomaly who can live well and play hard on the worst kind of food. Isaac here, who's running the desk, said Trump eats McDonald's a lot because it's hard food to poison. And he's a man who lives on the edge of assassination attempts perpetually.

What Trump is as an individual is plainly pretty unique and now more powerful than ever. How will he govern when it comes to nutrition? He said himself numerous times, notably, of course, on Joe Rogan, that he was going to let Bobby Kennedy loose on Big Pharma, loose on big food. And if you're going to do that, that's ultimately going to mean the empowerment. Would you agree with me? Let me know in the comments and chat.

of farmers. You've got to have people, maybe a really small scale, growing healthy food, rearing healthy food, hopefully humanely and responsibly when it comes to meat, so that people are eating, ideally, would you agree, food that's reared and grown near them rather than food that's being all flown around the world, processed, all injected with hormones and chemicals and sprayed with pesticides. That's what we're talking about here. That's a revolutionary change.

And one of the reasons I believe the Trump administration is being formed is because people across the world are rejecting globalism. And globalism is the centralized control of as many resources as possible and the reduction of the citizenry to a kind of serf class, the unpersoning.

And in order to do that, you've got to shut down independent media. You've got to close down smearing and dissenting voices. You've got to legitimize control by creating systems of continual and perpetual fear. But you've also got to deal with the basics at a granular level. You've got to look at something like our ability to

feed and clove ourselves and say, how are we going to stop that? Well, former Labour Party advisor, Labour's our version of the Democrats, our globalist centralist party, saying that farmers should be annihilated and wiped out in the same way industrial workers were in the 70s and 80s in my country. A lot of people consider that to be a massive scar on the working class blue collar community to this day.

Do you think these are the kind of policies that define globalism? Let me know in the comments and chat. Are they all about getting control of your life? And if that means getting control of your food, they are going to take control.

of your food and is a movement like Trump's ultimately about taking control back. We'll see when he governs whether it empowers ordinary people, ordinary communities. My prayer, of course, for all of us is that it does. One thing we've all seen through, thanks to independent media, is the claim that the center left is about helping us. It's about controlling us

under the guise of help. Let's have a look at this former Labour advisor saying that small farmers should be destroyed. If you're a farmer or you believe that farming is vital and that part of the food and health solutions for America are going to be about the empowerment of farmers, let me know what you think about this wherever you're seeing this clip. A privileged status for their farms. And I think that may or may not be right. I'm personally in favour of doing to, you know, farmers who want to go on the streets, we can do to them

what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners. So just to be clear, Johnny, you would, what, beat them up? No, close that. There's an industry we could do without. Okay. All right. So this got weird. So you would do to farmers what Margaret Thatcher did to miners, which was, you know, very heavy-handed police tactics, followed by what? Putting them out of business?

If people are so upset that they want to go on the streets and spray slurry on them, then we don't need the small farmers. Right. Okay, John, I'm not sure that's a... Just to clarify, you were a former Labour special adviser, possibly emphasis on the word former there, but...

Wow, that's incredible to see the way they think and what their plans are. They are all about generating impotence, castrating any powerful group, breaking any relationship that we have with one another and the land. And they call it care, anything that might generate personal dignity, anything that might

Give you the ability to provide nutrition for your family. The globalists are about shutting that down, always under the guise of helping you. Oh no, there's a pandemic. Get in your home. Take this medicine. You did clinically trial it correctly, didn't you? We can trust these public officials, can we? We...

aren't going to find out down the line that Big Pharma were pursuing profit, that big tech were propagating the message of the state, that the state was defaulting to authoritarianism and that dissenting voices were being censored. We're not going to learn, are we, that there were risks of myocarditis that were being repressed, risks of miscarriage that were not being reported. Are we going to find that out? This...

is the reason that the pandemic period is so significant in understanding contemporary media and contemporary politics is because it revealed what globalism is, because a pandemic is global. That's almost what the word means, or at least what part of that word means. And it revealed to us the infrastructure and it revealed to us the demons that operate within that false light pantheon. Figures like Bill Gates, for example, who we'll be talking about

a little later and Bill Gates's attempt to take power through bureaucracy and through philanthropy. But when it comes to farmers and nutrition, I don't think it's possible to make America healthy again without empowering farmers. So small farming is about to be radically revolutionized, I would say. You're going to see responsible farming, localized local source for food. You're going to see food made affordable for the maximum number of

people. You're going to see a revision in the way that welfare is conducted so that healthy foods are promoted and propagated. Don't you think that's the future for America? And I suppose that's going to be possible while Donald Trump continues to thrive on like Big Macs and maybe them like super hot apple pies. I don't know. But.

For me, if you're talking about making America healthy again, that's going to involve farmers, food and nutrition. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat. Let me know how you feel when you see politicians and political advisers advocating for further authority to destroy farmers. Do you recognise what that's likely about? Are you grateful that that project is being disrupted across the world, albeit financially?

through nationalism, which a lot of people condemn, but I continue to believe is an understandable response to globalism. Let me know what you think, though. That's just what I think. And continue to stay free. Remember, of course, we can't make this content without our...

our partners. If you are an American and you're concerned about forthcoming tax payments, you might want to listen to the words of this sponsor very carefully. Oh no! The October the 15th deadline has just passed. Are you prepared for what's coming? It could be crazy. Do you owe back taxes? Are your tax returns...

still unfiled. Well, if that's the case and you've missed the deadline to file for an extension, you have to ensure that you are ready in the case that the IRS ramp up enforcement. But there's still hope. There is always hope. Tax Network USA has helped taxpayers save over a billion dollars in tax debt and has filed over 10,000 tax returns. They specialise in helping people like you reduce their tax burdens. Act now. Visit

tnusa.com forward slash brand, or you can call 1-800-958-1000. Obviously, it's only applicable if you're a US citizen, or at least in the US. You can get free consultation. The experts will walk you through the simple questions that are required to see how much you can save. So take control today. Visit tnusa.com forward slash brand, or call 1-800-958-1000. Do it while you still can.

The globalists continue with their post-election autopsy. Why did we lose? How did we lose? Why won't people do what they're told and let us help them into internment camps and seize control of their lives, usually under the auspices of concern? Take your medicine. Watch the media we want you to watch. Revere and watch.

our preferred billionaires and loathe and detest the billionaires that we loathe and detest? Is there any figure more likely to benefit from the globalist advances of the increasingly disrupted and crestfallen centrist left than Bill Gates? What

is Bill Gates all about? Many people still claim that Bill Gates is the world's greatest philanthropist looking for ways to help us across the world on the continent of Africa and all across the nation of India. There he is, Bill Gates helping throughout the pandemic. Here he is, Bill Gates, offering you a little bit more help. Have some help. Have a vaccine. Do you invest in vaccines? Mind your own business. That's misinformation. Here's

some money for the BBC. Here's some money for the mainstream media. Why won't you let me help you? I'll help you so hard you won't sit down for a week. Jeffrey, I'm going to need another flight to unwind. Get rid of the flight logs, Jeffrey. Power in the world today is a crazy, crazy thing. But during the pandemic period, we learned a lot about how it operates. Over in my country, at the height of Brexit, a significant

architect of the campaigning around that issue was a man called Dominic Cummings. Dominic Cummings has just posted about Anthony Fauci likely facing a reckoning under the new investigations of the burgeoning administration of Trump. Here is Dominic Cummings post on that subject.

Very much hope one of the first things the new administration does is say we are publishing all of the files on COVID, lab leak, funding of gain of function, Fauci, the international correspondents on lab leak, including with leading UK scientists and government. There will be public hearings under oath and jail for perjury.

declassification of 100% of files and we will prosecute those found to have conspired to cover up everything to do with this. Meanwhile, we're also banning all gain of function and appointing at Bajalis and at Keesveld to replace the FDA and CDC. We will publish all hidden data on COVID vaccines to begin restoring trust after the old regime lied and destroyed trust."

the Fauci network should be rolled up and retired en masse with some jailed and their media supports, i.e. most of the old media driven our business. So powerful and strong words from a very formerly very powerful government official. It's unthinkable that this person who was at the heart of government during the pandemic era would just a matter of years later speak out so definitively

against another government official, albeit one from another country, Fauci. Let me know in the comments and chat. Do you think that Fauci should be, oh not YouTube, let me know in the comments and chat, do you think that Fauci should be jailed? Do you think that there should be public inquiries into the events of the COVID pandemic? And what do you think are the

collective power of individuals like Bill Gates and Fauci, sort of private citizens that are billionaires that seem to have a lot of influence that donate an incredible amount of money to the WHO. That's Bill Gates. Fauci at the time, a much beloved public official. And what do you think we learn? What are we learning about power from the subsequent revelations around how the pandemic was handled? Now, here is Bobby Kennedy.

And if what we've been promised is true, he's about to become a very powerful individual with government, with a mandate to clear out the FDA and the CDC and the NIH, and with the ability to confront big pharma. Are we going to get the kind of inquiries we deserve? Are we going to get the kind of trials and revelations that we're all craving? Are we going to get the kind of

apology that many people think they're owed for the way that your country and mine and indeed the world was run during that pandemic period. Certainly,

Bobby Kennedy's been incredibly outspoken about Bill Gates and the impact of his vaccines in another area, both of medicine and of the globe. Vaccines that Gates advocated for and pushed in Africa and their impact. Now, while this might seem tangential to you, it's significant because we're learning now that there is a new narrative, there is a new power, there is a new appetite. And where did that

appetite come from? It came from you. Who are the people watching us right now in the Rumble chat? I'm talking to you, Captain Cy and Silver Wizard and Zach 1328. They're all through the pandemic period. We're like, are we being lied to? What's going on? Is it right that Bill Gates gives all this money to the WHO and then he's on TV telling us we got to take this or that? Is it right that we weren't told that it was never clinically trialed against transmission and yet they were telling us that we were going to kill our grandparents if we visited them? Hey, were they shy

down the truth about adverse events, the variety of adverse events that ones that have now proven myocarditis, pericarditis, various impacts on female reproductive system, including miscarriage. What extraordinary time we've lived through. And will we now get the reckoning we deserve? In the British government, people are

quaking and flaking and cracking and realizing there's a reckoning upon them. Former officials like Dominic Cumming, who was always outspoken, a bit of a maverick and a radical, now demanding that Fauci face trial and maybe even jail. So what fate awaits Bill Gates and the other jet setters and island hoppers that found their fun while Jeffrey Epstein was alive, the world's most fancy Willy Wonka travel agent? Will they get...

the reckoning that's coming to them. Let's have a look at Bobby Kennedy talking about the effects of vaccines promoted by Gates in Africa. Let me just give you one quick other example. The most popular vaccine in the world is the DTP vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. We got rid of it in this country because it was causing injuries, brain injuries, severe brain injuries or death to one in every 300 children.

We used it in the 80s, and that's why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act that then gave them immunity from liability. But in Europe, they don't use it. In America, they don't use it. But we give it to 161 million African children a year. So Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved 30 million lives.

The Danish government said, show us the data. He wasn't able to. So they went to Africa and did their own studies. And they looked at 30 years of DTP data. And what they found shocked them all. They found that girls who got the DTP were dying at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls. But they were dying of things that nobody had ever associated with the vaccine. They were dying of diphtheria.

anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia.

And nobody noticed for 30 years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls who were dying. And what had happened is these girls were not dying of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. The vaccine had protected them against those, but it had also ruined their immune systems. And they were unable to defend themselves against other just minor diseases that were that other kids who had hearty immune systems could

we're able to fend off. So that's why you need these long-term studies. And that's why I'm worried that we don't do that here in the United States. This is what I love about populism. Populism means that people are going to be listened to and heard. Populism is a dirty word among the elites who regard us as the vulgarity, ignorant, the great unwashed, those that need to be controlled, those that will have nothing and be content, those of us that will sit down and shut

our mouths at the behest and impolite, ignorant request of those centralised and centralising bureaucrats. Well, it seems now the world is changing fast. And whilst it isn't an absolute utopia, and if you know the origins of that word, you wouldn't want one, it does seem that there's a trend towards questioning institutions, questioning League legacy media, questioning lawfare and the movements of the judiciary. And we've all

these questions around across the world. Surely government officials are looking at their actions and wondering what kind of decisions they're going to be making, recognizing that surely across the world now we're going to see populism rising up in elections everywhere. They can't

control the media or J.D. Vance says America will leave NATO so the EU must be quaking my country Great Britain must be thinking how are we going to stop popular voices rising up and telling the truth how are we going to cover up

for the cover-ups we made during the pandemic period? How are we going to account for the fact we were controlling and censoring and smearing throughout the pandemic period? How are we going to make people hate people that are advocating for their freedom while we continue to control them? What are we going to do to stop the collapse of legacy media now that no one trusts them? How

are the people that even work at Legacy Media going to look into the mirror and lie to themselves every day? I'm doing a good thing. I'm doing a good thing for the world. I'm reporting on truth. It's all up for question now. This is not a time for complacency indeed. No, this is a time to double down and to push forward to ensure that this Trump

administration, administrates and manages and governs on the basis upon which they were elected, which appears to be drain the swamp, end the wars, bring about peace, make America healthy again. I'm a visitor in your country. You voted for what you voted for. And I pray you get what

What you deserve. What I'm saying clearly, plainly is legacy media across the world. They're in serious trouble. Institutions of corruption, the kind of relationships that exist between big pharma, the state, globalist entities like the WHO, NATO that need your tax dollars and need the compliance of your government are all

All now surely asking a lot of questions about what the future holds. Things are changing. And whilst you might revere some of the heroes of this movement, whether that's Elon Musk or Vivek or obviously Donald Trump or Bobby Kennedy, what's more important is it's your attention, your power, your ability,

to follow or oppose that represents real power. That's why, of course, I will always advocate for your own personal relationship with God to be moved to the forefront so that we can't be duped, misguided, misled, controlled or lied to in the way that we have been by globalists in the past. If we have our own personal

connection with a higher force. If we have our own set of virtues that include things like sacrifice and service, we're no longer the malleable dupes that they require us to be. Here are some interesting insights, I'll tell you, into how Bobby Kennedy intends to govern the FDA. What's

being suggested is nothing short of a total clear out. And what's fascinating about this is to watch how the legacy media is having to come to terms with the fact that Bobby Kennedy was right about a lot of stuff that they were undermining, denying, lying, censoring and shutting down. This could be a fantastic moment for all of us. Firstly, let's have a look at Bobby Kennedy telling

that he's going to clear out the entire FDA, or at least whole departments of it. And then let's look at Van Jones, one of the CNN pundits, who I believe to be a really good person, actually. I met him once. He was really, really lovely. Under having a kind of personal awakening. Let me know in the comments and chat what you think about that. Here's Bobby Kennedy, first of all. You say clearing out the corruption in your terms. Would that mean clearing out the top-level federal service workers that are currently at the FDA and the CDC? In some category.

I would say. What does that look like? Yeah. In some categories of work, there are entire departments, like the nutrition departments at FDA, that have to go, that are not doing their job. They're not protecting our kids. Why do we have Froot Loops in this country that have 18 or 19 ingredients, and you go to Canada and it's got two or three? Would you eliminate any of the agencies? My...

To eliminate the agencies, as long as it requires congressional approval, I wouldn't be doing that. I can get the corruption out of the agencies. That's what I've been doing for 40 years. I've sued all those agencies. I have a PhD in corporate corruption, and that's what I do. And once they're not corrupt, once Americans are getting good science and are allowed to make their own choices, they're going to get a lot healthier. Yeah.

A PhD in corporate corruption. I feel like I could get one of those now. Don't you feel like you've been educated in corporate corruption over the last few years? Don't you think that sort of since the celebrity president phenomena began, was that with Bill Clinton? Certainly they doubled down with Obama. It's been...

what that has masked those glistening avatars at the front of government has been deep, deep corruption and abandonment of ordinary people. Is that what you feel? That's what I feel. So with our man Bobby Kennedy having a PhD in corruption, he's going to have his work cut out at the FDA. What fascinates me most of all is watching the pivots and analysis of legacy media as they seek to understand the new landscape that they find themselves in.

Here, as far as I understand, because I've not watched the clip yet, Van Jones is talking about how Bobby Kennedy is right about a lot. Yesterday, we talked about Colbert ridiculing Bobby Kennedy for some of his evident and obvious eccentricities. But what's really important is the subject of American health. And

and nutrition and agriculture and farming and the ridiculous power of Big Pharma, which the left would have agreed about and with not so long ago during the sort of Sackler family's role in the opioid crisis, for example. Why did they participate

in that scandalous affair of amplifying the power of Big Pharma, turning Pfizer and Moderna and Johnson & Johnson into heroes, willingly accepting what was at the end of their fork and at the end of that spike without inquiry and question. I'm still fascinated by it. Let's see what Van Jones has got to say about Bobby Kennedy. I mean, we were talking in the break about, you know, there are a lot of Americans who are concerned about

health and safety, whether regulations are really keeping up with the information, whether or not their food is safe, their water is safe, that is being co-opted by people who want to make a conspiracy out of everything. And what do you think about how that should be addressed? I mean, even after all of this. Well, look, I think that I think progressives make a mistake when we just roll our eyes and just kind of throw everybody in the same crazy bucket when people ask tough questions.

I think you have low trust voters and you have high trust voters. And low trust voters are also on the progressive side. You have voters who say, listen, all these experts have been telling me stuff that turned out not to be true. They gave me a housing bubble that wiped out all my assets. They had my kid go fight in a war that was dumb.

I don't believe everything that we were told during COVID served my child well in his or her school. So you do have people who have said, look, experts have let us down. And so I think that the mistake we make is then here comes RFK Jr. on the nutty train. And all we do is throw rocks at him as opposed to saying, you know what?

If there's evidence, there's been some corporate capture, some of these agencies. As Democrats, we should go after that. We should actually grab this mantle. We want to make sure that kids are safe. We don't necessarily brush moms aside. I don't know. I'm concerned. I think progressives are making a big mistake. We have left these parental concerns for the right wing to exploit. I think that we should take them seriously, but not give in to the crazies. I do think that you're right about that.

Hey, don't you think that's the kind of analysis that's required over on those kind of legacy media outlets? A little bit of open-heartedness, a little bit of albeit too late mea culpa, recognition that immediately fixate in on the idea that Bobby Kennedy is some kind of lunatic rather than a man with a PhD in corporate corruption might be exactly the kind of transformation that's required. My personal belief is it's too late for the legacy media. We don't need New York Times.

We don't need CNN. We don't need BBC, MSNBC, The Times. We don't need them anymore. We know what they exist for. They exist to serve the interests of the powerful. You cannot serve the interests of the powerful without the pretense that you're somehow serving the populare, the population, ordinary people, claiming to bring them information that might titillate them, claiming to protect them from imaginary threats, creating threats where there were none. Those threats

Days are over. Let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with that, that the legacy media should lose any kind of support that it gets, that there should be real scrutiny into where they get their advertising revenue, that they should get no support on platforms like YouTube, that this is a new era, that they should be banished, vanquished, closed down and lost, that they should know exile because all they've done is serve deep darkness. Once in a while, they'll pull up a claim, but didn't we explain

this corruption. That was Wargate, baby. That was a long, long time ago. Since Assange, you've been doing nothing but working for the man and you've been working hard only on your knees, never to pray, only to serve the diabolical fellatio that they perform almost continually. It's time

for them to be ended. It's time for them to be closed down. Where they're supported by tax, it should be foreclosed. Where they have relationships with corporations, it should be investigated. Where they lie about people, it should be exposed. End this pretense. But that's just what I think. Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat. Look at who gives them money. Look at who invests. If they're connected to the Epsteins and to the people that seem to be able to conjure up great revenue for philanthropic dones, look it up.

shut them down it's a new era now but that's just what i think let me know what you think in the comments and chat if you're watching this on youtube of course you know you gotta subscribe and turn on the notification bell and ultimately we want you over on rumble where we have been guaranteed we can say whatever we want and so can you too use that free speech to elevate us as iron sharpens iron not to drag us down into a quagmire of empty quarreling but more

important than any of that. If you can, of course, please stay free. Now, if you're not an awakened wonder yet, you've got to become an awakened wonder. Here's a little bit of my conversation with Eric Metaxas, the brilliant writer here talking about, hmm, what do you want to see? People don't know what authoritarianism is. This is the kind of conversations I'm interested in having, man. I'm interested in having conversations about how we can use

Great and holy power to challenge corrupt authority. Check this. And only if you're a very spoiled leftist who is enjoying real freedom can you live in this fantasy that somehow you're oppressed, that you're dealing with authoritarianism. And it's just kind of funny. I mean, even watching the TV the last day or so to see people acting as though

you know, they're, they're living in this, in this dark world suddenly. And I think if you were living in a dark world, you would keep your mouth shut. You wouldn't go on TV and start broadcasting, uh, your, your views. Uh, you're not living in a dark world. You're living in a world where you have tremendous freedom to voice your opinion, uh, contrary, uh, to, you know, what, what others think. And that's an, it's just an extraordinary thing. So I think that,

unless people have really experienced authoritarianism, they just don't know what it is. There's stuff there that I disagree with, but I really like Eric Metaxas and I really enjoyed that conversation. And you're going to want to join me live for my conversation with Jay John. Look him up. He's a brilliant evangelist and preacher and he's taught me a great deal. We'll be streaming live tomorrow on Break Bread exclusively on Locals. Let's have a quick look at

X. Is it possible that Charlie Kirk has posted this in response to my prayer? Breaking. CNN are firing stars. Stars, yeah. Hundreds of staff as the network's ratings continue to tank. They're going to axe loads of them. So there it is. The legacy media are in trouble. And indeed, let's go full screen, they deserve to be in trouble, don't they? After the way that they've behaved, after the way they treat people. Listen, if you watch this on Locals Now, I understand there's some issues with the streaming. We'll be

Looking into that with Christy, Isaac and Phoenix in a conversation directly after the show. We'll be dealing with that now. We're going to be back tomorrow. What is tomorrow? Wednesday. We'll be back tomorrow. Not for more of the same, but for more of the different. Until then, if you can stay free.