Voters prioritize more immediate concerns over abstract principles or procedures. Democracy requires protection by elites and institutions, not just voters.
The transformation of the Republican Party under Trump, efforts to limit access to the ballot, and violent threats against election workers and officials.
The Electoral College distorts the democratic process, leading to outcomes like the 2016 election where the winner of the popular vote did not win the presidency.
Reforms include automatic voter registration, eliminating gerrymandering, abolishing the Senate filibuster, term limits on the Supreme Court, and replacing the Electoral College with a direct popular vote.
The U.S. has unique institutions like the Electoral College and the Senate that disproportionately favor minority rule, making it more susceptible to democratic backsliding.
Indicators include the use of government agencies to intimidate or punish political opponents, changes in behavior of key societal actors like media and business, and efforts to weaken the civil service.
Democracy is constantly challenged but has historically proven to be the best system for protecting civil liberties and allowing peaceful transitions of power.
American voters have elected a President) with broadly, overtly authoritarian aims. It’s hardly the first time that the democratic process has brought an anti-democratic leader to power. The political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, who both teach at Harvard, assert that we shouldn’t be shocked by the Presidential result. “It’s not up to voters to defend a democracy,” Levitsky says. “That’s asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures.” He adds, “With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever—in any society, in any culture—prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy—not voters.” Levitsky and Ziblatt published “How Democracies Die)” during Donald Trump’s first Administration, but they argue that what’s ailing our democracy runs much deeper—and that it didn’t start with Trump. “We’re the only advanced, old, rich democracy that has faced the level of democratic backsliding that we’ve experienced. . . . So we need to kind of step back and say, ‘What has gone wrong here?’ If we don’t ask those kinds of hard questions, we’re going to continue to be in this roiling crisis,” Ziblatt says.