Trump's ability to resonate with voters' economic anxieties, particularly regarding cost of living and inequality, played a significant role. His simple message of control, complaint, and resistance appealed to a broad spectrum of voters, including those who felt the Biden administration was slow to address economic issues.
Trump's campaign focused on a straightforward message of control, complaint, and resistance, which resonated with voters who felt a sense of deep inequality and anti-incumbency. His ability to voice the resentments of economically disadvantaged voters was a key factor.
The Democratic Party, despite its self-image as the champion of economic issues, failed to effectively communicate a narrative that addressed the defining economic fact of reduced social mobility and growing inequality. This disconnect was evident in the party's inability to galvanize support around economic grievances.
Misogyny was a significant factor, with Trump running a highly misogynistic campaign that targeted Harris directly. The daily insults and attacks on women, including Harris, highlighted the ongoing power of sexism and misogyny in American politics.
The party overestimated its coalition's strength on issues like democracy and the impact of the Dobbs decision. This misjudgment led to a catastrophic misreading of the electorate's mood, contributing to the party's failure to effectively counter Trump's narrative.
Trump could replace two conservative justices, potentially creating a Supreme Court dominated by conservative ideology until 2045. This shift could further erode post-Watergate norms and expand executive power, significantly impacting American democracy.
Trump is likely to push for the prosecution of political opponents, a move that would break democratic norms and traditions. His history of demanding investigations into his rivals suggests he will continue to weaponize law enforcement for political gain.
Musk's alignment with Trump could create an oligarchic arrangement where policy and profit are deeply intertwined. This fusion of influence and transaction could further corrupt the political process, making it more difficult to separate policy from personal gain.
Trump's campaign effectively blamed Biden for global conflicts, such as Putin's invasion of Ukraine and Hamas's attack on Israel. This gaslighting ploy resonated with a significant chunk of the electorate, particularly those who pay less attention to foreign policy.
The party needs to address its disconnect with economically disadvantaged voters and reconsider its messaging on economic issues. There is also a need to balance the influence of the progressive left with a more inclusive and economically focused narrative.
The Washington roundtable is joined by David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, to discuss how Donald Trump, a convicted felon and sexual abuser, won both the Electoral College and the popular vote—a first for a Republican President since 2004. Democrats lost almost every swing state, even as abortion-rights ballot measures found favor in some conservative states. On this crossover episode with The New Yorker Radio Hour, they discuss Kamala Harris’s campaign, Trump’s overtly authoritarian rhetoric, and the American electorate’s rightward trajectory.
This week’s reading:
“Donald Trump’s Revenge),” by Susan B. Glasser
“2016 and 2024),” by Jelani Cobb
“How Donald Trump, the Leader of White Grievance, Gained Among Hispanic Voters),” by Kelefa Sanneh
“The Reckoning of the Democratic Party),” by Jay Caspian Kang
“How America Embraced Gender War),” by Jia Tolentino
“Donald Trump’s Second Term Is Joe Biden’s Real Legacy),” by Isaac Chotiner
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to [email protected]) with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.