cover of episode The Origins of “Braiding Sweetgrass”

The Origins of “Braiding Sweetgrass”

2023/8/25
logo of podcast The New Yorker Radio Hour

The New Yorker Radio Hour

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Parul Sehgal
R
Robin Wall Kimmerer
Topics
Parul Sehgal: 本期节目采访了《编织甜草》的作者罗宾·沃尔·基默尔,探讨了这本书的起源、影响以及她对环境和人与自然关系的思考。基默尔是一位植物学家,也是一位土著美国人,她的作品试图弥合西方科学和土著知识之间的差距,并引发了广泛的共鸣,在《纽约时报》畅销书榜上停留三年多,销售超过百万册。她获得麦克阿瑟奖学金,也体现了其作品的价值和影响力。节目中,塞格尔还采访了基默尔,探讨了这本书的起源、写作过程以及她对环境和人与自然关系的思考。 Parul Sehgal: 基默尔的写作风格独特,她将科学与价值观相结合,试图让人们重新爱上土地,并理解自然界的馈赠。她认为,许多环保运动都基于恐惧,而她想让人们重新爱上土地,因为缺乏对土地的爱是导致目前环境问题的根源。她希望通过讲述故事,让人们将世界视为馈赠,从而激发感恩和互惠。 Parul Sehgal: 基默尔在事业稳定后,开始用自己的声音写作,创作自己想创作的作品,而不是机构要求的作品。她在写作《编织甜草》时,目标读者有两个群体:一个是科学同行,另一个是她的土著社区,她希望能够尊重和准确地表达土著的知识。她希望在写作中,能够代表自然,并激发读者对自然界的同情、怜悯和尊重。 Parul Sehgal: 基默尔将母性作为一种工具,来表达人与土地之间可以拥有的亲密关系,即被土地滋养,并反过来滋养土地。她认为,学习和使用土著语言,对她来说是一种疗愈的过程,也是对殖民主义造成的创伤的抵抗。 Parul Sehgal: 基默尔的家族史反映了美国印第安人政策的历史,她的祖先曾三次被迫迁移,这使得她重拾并传承这些知识显得尤为重要,因为它们差点就消失了。 Robin Wall Kimmerer: 我想让人们重新爱上这片土地,因为我认为这就是我们现在所处境地的原因——我们对土地的爱还不够。我们把周围的一切都称为自然资源、生态系统服务,或者商品,而从我的角度来看,所有这些都是礼物。当我意识到大多数人并不理解世界是礼物时,我便给自己定下了这个目标:看看我们能否通过讲述故事来帮助人们将世界视为礼物。感恩和互惠之情由此产生。 Robin Wall Kimmerer: 我在事业稳定后,开始用自己的声音写作,创作自己想创作的作品,而不是机构要求的作品。我在写作《编织甜草》时,目标读者有两个群体:一个是科学同行,另一个是我的土著社区,我希望能够尊重和准确地表达土著的知识。我希望在写作中,能够代表自然,并激发读者对自然界的同情、怜悯和尊重。 Robin Wall Kimmerer: 我将母性作为一种工具,来表达人与土地之间可以拥有的亲密关系,即被土地滋养,并反过来滋养土地。学习和使用土著语言,对我来说是一种疗愈的过程,也是对殖民主义造成的创伤的抵抗。我的家族史反映了美国印第安人政策的历史,我的祖先曾三次被迫迁移,这使得我重拾并传承这些知识显得尤为重要,因为它们差点就消失了。 Robin Wall Kimmerer: 这本书的成功,是因为人们互相推荐,这让我感到乐观,并认为这本书是一种邀请,邀请人们进行互惠,贡献自己的天赋。人们对这本书的泪流满面的反应,表明人们渴望与地球建立联系。我现在关注的是如何通过写作,让人们与自然的生命个体建立联系,激发生态同情心,从而避免环境灾难。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Robin Wall Kimmerer, a botanist and member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, wrote 'Braiding Sweetgrass' to bridge Western science with Indigenous teachings, resulting in a best-selling book that has impacted readers deeply.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

My Wrangler jeans from Walmart are legit my favorite go-to pants. They got that slim cut that's always fresh for going out. Hey, what's up? They're durable enough, even for my shift, and stretchy enough for when I want to kick back and chill with a movie. So basically, they can do it all, paying on my budget. I mean, come on. You really can't beat all that. Shop your Wrangler pants at Walmart. Listener supported. WNYC Studios.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm Farrell Stegall, in today for David Remnick. And you see all the blackberries. Oh, they were not in bloom yesterday, but look at this cloud of white. It's all blackberries. There'll be jam and pie this summer.

I recently took a trip to western New York, to its fields and its forests, to visit Robin Wall Kimmerer, an unlikely literary star, a botanist by training, a specialist in moss, an expert naturalist. They keep it up all day long. Kimmerer has had a long career in universities, but she felt constrained by the world of western science.

She's Native American, and the Indigenous teachings she learned, the sense of connection she felt with the land, plants, and animals around her, had been dismissed by the scientific community. And while established in her career, Kimura set out to publish a collection of essays to bridge the divide. The result is Braiding Sweetgrass. It's published first by a small press. It's become a phenomenon since. It's been on the New York Times bestseller list for more than three years and sold well over a million copies.

Last year, Kimmerer received the MacArthur Fellowship, the so-called Genius Grant. So yeah, let's walk up to the pond. It's a decade since Braiding Sweetgrass was first published, and I went to talk with Robin Wall Kimmerer at her home outside Syracuse, New York. You know when people write memoirs?

that are read and beloved readers will talk to them about like oh how's your mother and how's your sister we act that way about your pond and your tree right which is what you wanted it is i love that because in that case you know it's it's it's it's an attachment to place and you understand what it would be like to have that attachment home yeah and to work for it

So we're standing at the banks of this pond near her property. It's ringed with willows and dogwoods, and it's loud. It's so full of birdsong and insects, it's noisier than my block in Brooklyn. You see this bright, shiny yellow grass in here? That's sweet grass. Isn't it beautiful? Hold that for a little while, and as it starts to dry, it will give you the most wonderful fragrance.

When she bought the property, the pond was full of algae, choked with algae. And she worked very, very hard to dredge it out, to clean it, to make it a place where her daughters could swim, but also to return it to this loud, humming, squawking community around us.

So many birds there. There they go. Look, there's that pair of little green herons, the parents taking off. You see the red-winged blackbirds over there, these dragonflies humming about. It really is, for me, a magical little place. There's so much life here. We just heard the yellow warbler there. Brown thrash are calling over there.

I like that you hear them, but they also must be registering you. They must be like, she's back. Robin is here. She's making her. She's brought some other humans with her this time. It's true. It's true. I know they know me. My pandemic project, when we couldn't have friends over for dinner, I started having dinner parties at the pond.

for the winter birds. So I would go up and spread a table with all of these treats. And my goal was by the end of the winter to have the chickadees land on my hand and eat seeds from my hand. I thought it was going to take months. It took about two weeks. But yeah, I know they all know me. You know, it's easier for me to describe what Braiding Sweetgrass does to a reader rather than describe the book itself. You know, it's a book that changes people. It moves them. It

You have a spiritual experience reading this book. If you haven't read it, imagine a series of linked essays that don't fit cleanly into any conceivable category. These are scientific essays. Why do asters and goldenrod bloom together in such intense display? Or why does maple sap flow so abundantly in the spring? But they're also a meditation on our relationship with the natural world, and they draw heavily on Native American teachings handed down from generation to generation.

So Kimmerer's home is surrounded by rolling hay fields and farmland, but her house is ringed by giant maples. Would you like a cold drink? Yes, please. We went inside and sat at her dining room table to talk. What were the earliest sort of seeds of this book for you? Before it was even a book, did it start as questions? Did it start as sentences? Where did you find it, or how did it find you? For me, it really started with this notion that

It feels to me that our relationship with land is broken. And so much of the environmental movement to me is grounded in

in fear and we have a lot to be afraid about. Let's not ignore that. But what I really wanted to do was to try to find a way in which to help people really love the land again because I think that's why we are where we are, that we haven't loved the land enough. And part of that for me is tied up with the notion that we look around us at all of this abundance

and we call it natural resources. We think about it as ecosystem services or sometimes commodities, right? Whereas from my perspective and very much grounded in a Potawatomi way of knowing, all of this is a gift. And what I was seeing is that most people don't understand the world as gift. And when you do understand

the response of gratitude and reciprocity flows from that. So I really set for myself this goal of seeing if we could help tell stories that would help people see the world as gift. I want to imagine where you were when this mission, this great ambition sort of presented itself. Where were you living? Where were you, you know, what was happening in your life when you first started working on this book?

I was living here in the abundance of upstate New York. And at that time, my youngest daughter was still at home, about to leave for college. And so it was a transition time for me. It was also a time when I felt well-established in my career as a scientist.

I had fulfilled the sorts of things that tenure requires of you. I had done all those things which were expected of me. And I wanted also to do that thing which I wanted for myself, not what institutions wanted of me. And so that helped give me the impetus to write in what I think of as my true voice.

One of the mysteries about this book for me is...

It has to do with the voice and the sense as I was reading it, sometimes I was like, who's speaking right now and who is being spoken to? There's a rotating point of view. Sometimes it feels to me that you're writing to your daughters, but then the point of view shifts and you actually have a chapter told from the point of view of your daughter. At some points, it feels like almost like you're trying to make it a language for nature to speak to nature. Did you have a reader in mind as you were working on it and hearing your voice speak?

your free voice for the first time? Did you imagine it finding readers in the world? Who was in your mind at that time? I was quite explicitly writing for two audiences at the beginning. Little did I know there would be quite a different audience. But I was writing for my scientific colleagues

in order to try to make the case for Indigenous science and traditional ways of knowing and reimagining what science looks like when it's imbued with values. So that was one audience. I also was writing always with my listening to Native people, that I wanted the stories that I told, the reflections that I shared, I wanted my Native community to say,

Yes, yes, this is true. This is our way. Because I wanted to be very sensitive to the fact that this is my story, but it's not my knowledge. This is the knowledge of collective generations of people listening to the land. So those were the two audiences that I had in mind.

But you're right that there's maybe an implicit audience. And for me, it is the land. You know, as a botanist, as a person who's just been madly in love with dirt and trees and birds forever, I wanted to be sure that I was representing them, that I was...

It's not possible to fully tell their story, but I wanted them to be present and to create a sense of empathy and compassion and respect for the living world. I mean, you describe yourself as being in love with dirt, but as I was reading this book, I started to keep a running list of words you were teaching me. And you're in love with dirt, but you're in love with language. And you taught me words...

that I'd never heard of. Wicker, the soft neighing sound of a horse. Ducks dabble the way they skim off the top. I have this beautiful list of language you've given me. And I'm curious about the origins of your sensitivity to language. When did that happen? Hmm.

What a good question. I certainly grew up in a family where there were fine storytellers. My dad was a wonderful storyteller and kind of the master of some of those old-time colorful expressions that I just loved. And so I'm sure that was an influence there.

But as a young person, I loved poetry. I still have the book set of poetry from when I was, you know, eight, nine, ten years old. So it feels like an innate love of language, which is also part of being a scientist, you know, that precision in

in language that that little part of leaf, it has a really particular name. And so being steeped in the particularities of the living world that comes from science also appeals to my poetic self because of that discipline of finding just the right word. ♪

The discipline and also the pleasure, right? When you describe a salamander as feeling soft like an overripe banana. That's pleasure for its own sake. You know, it's getting it right. So Kimmerer goes from being this academic scientist, and she was writing papers with titles like, and I looked one up, Environmental Determinants of Spatial Pattern in the Vegetation of Abandoned Lead Zinc Mines, to writing this book that's

far more poetic, unclassifiable searching. You know, and if you pick up this book and you go to the back of it and you see her bio, there's another really startling fact. She lists herself, before she lists herself as anything else, as a scientist or anything, she lists herself first as a mother. And that is unusual for any writer, let alone a scientist.

I'm so glad you've highlighted this because so often in the academy, we are asked to identify ourselves according to our institutions and our titles and our disciplines. And first and foremost, I know that I am a mother because it's relationship, it's nurture, it's

It's this sense of love, being loved by the world and having love for the world that really propels me. And in most scientific disciplines, we're not even allowed to talk about that. We can't even say the words. And so for me, it's an act of resistance to first claim that I'm a mother first. And for me...

The boundaries between me being a mother and being nurtured by Shkak Mikwe, by Mother Earth, they feel like the same thing. It feels very whole to me. And so inevitably I had to write about being a mother.

And you know another element of that is I'm constantly aware of the fact that what feels like second nature to me of this intimacy with the land and plants is not second nature to most of my readers. Nature is like a park or a wilderness area. And so I wanted to use mothering also as a vehicle for

expressing the kind of relationship that one can have with the living land, being mothered by the land and mothering in return. That's Robin Wall Kimmerer, author of Braiding Sweetgrass. Our conversation continues in just a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. My Keurig brewer from Walmart always comes in super clutch. I got it so I can keep grinding on my paper. You know I'm hitting that deadline.

I also got it so I could stay up late to do some exam cramming. And of course, you know I'll be ready to stroll into my morning class sipping in style. I guess you could say it's a literal lifesaver. Cheers to that. Shop your coffee fuel needs at Walmart.

I'm Maria Konnikova. And I'm Nate Silver. And our new podcast, Risky Business, is a show about making better decisions. We're both journalists whom we light as poker players, and that's the lens we're going to use to approach this entire show. We're going to be discussing everything from high-stakes poker to personal questions. Like whether I should call a plumber or fix my shower myself. And of course, we'll be talking about the election, too. Listen to Risky Business wherever you get your podcasts.

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm Parul Sehgal. I'm a staff writer at the magazine. I've been speaking today with Robin Wall Kimmerer, author of Braiding Sweetgrass, a book about botany and much more that's been on the New York Times bestseller list for more than three years. Braiding Sweetgrass shares Kimmerer's indigenous knowledge about the natural world. And one of the themes of her writing is her own family history.

She's an enrolled member of the citizen Potawatomi Nation, and her family's story contains the history of American Indian policy in the U.S. Her ancestors were forcibly removed three times in a single generation, pushed out of their homelands around Lake Michigan, and left essentially to starve in Oklahoma. It's one reason why it feels so powerful for Kimmerer to come back, reclaim these teachings in Braiding Sweetgrass. They were so nearly lost.

They say that we are inevitably living our ancestors' stories, and joyfully I am. I think about, in particular, my grandfather.

who at only nine years old was taken from his family on our reserve in Oklahoma and sent to the Carlisle Indian School, whose motto, you may know, was to kill the Indian to save the man. It was the most violent sort of colonial assimilative enterprise. And I always knew those stories growing up.

I also knew of my grandfather's resilience and resistance to that painful, painful chapter. But when I was a little kid, I longed for culture.

And I would ask my dad, you know, what's the word for this? Or what's the ceremony for that? And he always had to say, I don't know. That was taken from us at Carlisle. I'm so grateful to him that he didn't just say, I don't know. He said, this was taken from us. So that wound was always there.

present for me but as a young kid I remember saying if there could be schools that are designed to take that away doesn't that mean there could be schools that are designed to give it back to bring it back and so that story has really laid a path for me so every word of our language that I learn feels like a little piece of healing and

And so, yes, the wounds of colonialism, attempted erasure, attempted genocide are at the heart of the book. This is a book about resilience and remembering and recovery as well. You know, I think really early on in the formation of Breeding Sweetgrass, I wrote with what seemed...

hubris at the moment to say, I want this book to be medicine. And it turns out, I think it has been. Can you tell me a little bit about when you first realized that the book was starting to take off? Did you hear from readers? How did you come to know?

It began for me with letters, with real letters. And I remember the first one. I had a wonderful airmail letter from someone in France. And I thought, what? Someone in France is reading Braiding Sweetgrass and their response of how it helped them love land more. I thought, well, that's just wonderful. I have a reader.

And it meant so much to me. It meant so, I still have that letter and boxes of others, of beautiful handwritten correspondence and emails. And yeah, it was at first overwhelming, overwhelming.

to me. I had never any expectation that this book would find a wide audience. And so I feel deeply responsible to readers because they share often really intimate stories of awakening, of healing, of their own, what I would call longing for relationship with place. And

So that it fills my heart, but it also sometimes makes my heart heavy because it's a lot to carry. But I also am buoyed up by the fact that really often those letters come with a celebration of, and guess what I did?

I started a community garden. I began a forest preschool. The letter from someone who said, I work on Wall Street and I can no longer do so. And I am now moving to the northeast and moving north and starting an organic farm. Um...

hundreds of letters of people who are changing their lives because they're remembering something. They're remembering how they want to live. You know, there's a wonderful moment in your first book, Gathering Moss, where you say that when you look at moss, moss shouldn't have made it. Moss is small. Moss can't grab onto almost anything, can it, really? Moss has to live in the little cracks in the fissures, but

you know, it's, it teaches us poignant things right now. You write and you say that it's about leaving more than you take, working together and staying small. And I think you wrote that about 10 years before braiding sweetgrass. I did. Right? And, um,

I think about Breeding Sweetgrass with its own questions. As you say, you were writing it when your own girls were leaving home, right? It's a book about the culmination of certain kinds of mothering. And I'm wondering here now, what sorts of questions are preoccupying you? Are you looking at the moss again? What are you looking at? First, I want to say that both Gathering Moss and Breeding Sweetgrass are questions

works of love for mosses, for the world, and in the case of my children leaving, is also like an exercise of what am I going to do with all of this love, right? When I don't have to make peanut butter sandwiches, what am I going to do with all that love? Yeah, you make me cry too. Yeah.

And I'm still in that place, but in a place which now, how to say, you know, the world that I'm so in love with is on the precipice. And so that's what consumes me. How can stories, how can Indigenous knowledge be the medicine that can bring us back from the brink of

I don't know that it can be, but I'm certainly going to try because that's the gift that's been given to me. Yeah, to me, when I think about what will pull us back from the brink is a change in worldview.

away from this human exceptionalism and into kinship with the living world. If we really felt and understood and embodied kinship with the living world, we wouldn't cause our family to go extinct, right? We wouldn't. And so what I'm trying to do now with another writing project is to try to somehow...

really connect with readers to the personhood of nature, to the beingness of other species, and to really try to write in such a way that creates a wave of ecological compassion. So that's where my head and heart are.

Just the response to your book and the way it has been embraced and recommended. I mean, this was a book that is a success because people were placing it in other people's hands, right? Yeah. Does that make you feel optimistic?

It does. It does. The very fact that people are reading a book about plants, that they're reading a book about plants from an indigenous perspective, and that people are answering this call of reciprocity. You know, breeding sweetgrass is an invitation, isn't it? It's an invitation into reciprocity to say,

What is your gift and how could you give it to the world? And what I'm hearing as I travel and in correspondence, I'm hearing this huge yes. How I'm experiencing this is a word that you used at the outset, and that is of a kind of remembering.

I think when there are audiences of people in tears, I think, "What is this about?" This is about remembering what it would be like to be nurtured by the earth. And it's like people are deeply lonely for that.

So that gives me a lot of hope that there isn't this emotional response. But you know, it makes me think about a wonderful prompt that some fellow writers and I used in a conference once we said, "What do you love too much to lose?" We said to the audience. And we said to them, "And what are you going to do about it?" Their list of what do I love too much to lose was endless.

And the list of what am I going to do about it was wholly inadequate to the moment. That's Robin Wall Kimmerer, author of Braiding Sweetgrass, which was released 10 years ago this year. We spoke near her home in upstate New York. I'm Beryl Sagal. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I really enjoyed being with you on the show this week. David Remnick will be back next week. Thank you for listening.

The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbess of Tune Yards. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Brita Green, Adam Howard, Kalalia, Avery Keatley, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, and Ngofen Mputubwele, with guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Mike Kutchman, Michael May, David Gable, and Alejandra Decker. That's

and special assistance in the editing of this week's program from Karen Frillman. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund. My Wrangler jeans from Walmart are legit my favorite go-to pants. They got that slim cut that's always fresh for going out. Hey, what's up? They're durable enough, even for my shift, and stretchy enough for when I want to kick back and chill with a movie.

So basically, they can do it all. Hand on my budget. I mean, come on. You really can't beat all that. Shop your Wrangler pants at Walmart.