The election was seen as a choice between keeping the American system of government or trading it for a strongman authoritarian system. Many voters felt alienated from their leaders and squeezed by high prices, leading to a rejection of the status quo.
The first order of business is to stop the authoritarian from taking any uncontested ground. This includes pushing back against efforts to undermine the U.S. military, the free press, and civil society. It also involves ensuring the judiciary and Congress remain checks on the executive branch.
Plans include firing federal employees, rounding up perceived enemies, opening internment camps, and threatening military force against perceived threats. These actions are expected to start in the next few weeks to test how far they can go without pushback.
Civil society organizations are crucial as they represent the voluntary groups and associations that authoritarians need to crush to centralize power. These groups must give assurances that they will fight for democracy and encourage more participation to take up space that the government might try to monopolize.
Mixed-status families fear mass deportations, family separations, and the targeting of immigrants for mass expulsions. These actions could lead to the expulsion of millions of people who are already contributing members of society and living here with their families.
Some Latino voters were drawn to Trump's appeals to racial and ethnic grievances, moral panic, and a romanticized version of authoritarianism. These factors, along with economic concerns and a rejection of the status quo, contributed to his gains among Latino voters.
Blue state governors, like Maura Healey of Massachusetts, become crucial in opposing Trump's agenda. They can use regulatory authority, executive powers, and legislation to protect citizens, uphold the rule of law, and resist authoritarian policies.
The ACLU has been preparing since the winter for legal challenges, including against potential mass deportations using the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act. They aim to strategically challenge policies that are illegal or unconstitutional, coordinating among groups and focusing on what constitutes a win beyond just court victories.
Indivisible is holding a call with hundreds of progressive organizers to start planning their response. They emphasize the importance of community building, strategic planning, and rebuilding a winning coalition at the local level to fight anti-democratic movements.