Oli London Uncensored: Costco DENIES Selling Diddy Bulk Baby Oil
50:06 Share

Four years. That's how long it took Democrats to ruin our economy and plunge our southern border into anarchy. Who helped them hurt us? Ruben Gallego. Washington could have cut taxes for Arizona families, but Ruben blocked the bill. And his fellow Democrats gave a bigger break to the millionaire class in California and New York. They played favorites and cost us billions. And Ruben wasn't done yet.

We'll be right back.

Carrie and the Republicans will secure the border, support our families, and never turn their backs on us. Carrie Lake for Senate. I'm Carrie Lake, candidate for U.S. Senate, and I approve this message. Paid for by Carrie Lake for Senate and the NRSC.

Welcome to our special weekend show Sunday uncensored every week we produce four uncensored episodes of the Tim cast IRL podcast exclusively at Tim cast calm and we're going to bring you the most important for our weekend show if you want to check out more segments just like this become a member at Tim cast calm now enjoy the show so Costco is straight up like yeah we don't we don't sell bulk baby oil that's bullshit

I hope somebody from Costco has to testify. I hope they have to come in and say we have never, ever. There's no proof that he or anyone on his team has a Costco membership. We don't sell baby oil. Stop dragging your name through the mud. What do they say? This is ninety four point nine. The beat. Day's attorney sparked a response from Costco. Federal agents discovered a trove of baby oil.

They're calling him Black Epstein. Yep. Diddy's lawyer claims that Diddy has so much baby oil because he lives down the street from a Costco and buys it in bulk. I've been with him since 8 o'clock this morning, and it's about almost 3 o'clock now. He's...

Just laser focused. He's engaged. He's helpful. He's confident. You know, we're going through our defense as we do every day. And his spirits are relatively good. How do you explain the baby oil and the lubricants? A thousand bottles of baby oil. I don't think it was a thousand. I think it was a lot. I mean, there's a Costco right down the street. You know, I think Americans buy in bulk, as we know.

And, you know, this is consensual adults doing what consensual adults do. You know, we... Yeah, buying a thousand bottles of baby oil and, you know, going at it. That's what consensual adults do. They throw massive raging sex parties. I guess so. That's what Dr. Varma was doing in New York City. P. Diddy actually had a... One of his gardens at one of his properties actually had a 50-foot bed outside.

outside in the garden. He also had an indoor basketball court with large king-sized beds in there. So, you know, a thousand bottles is a lot for some people, but I guess not for P. Diddy with all those beds. Not if you have a 50-foot bed. That's, I mean, talk about a California king. Right, right. It's really quite something.

Do you think that there's anyone who's like, we don't care. He did nothing wrong. Or is everyone sort of like, this is a circus and we're just going to watch it. You know, I think that the issue is if he was actually involved in forcing people to have sex and trafficking. If a bunch of people, if the people who were involved did this of their own free will, that's not really my jam, but I wouldn't like...

I don't think that's illegal. Well, because there's consent there. You know, yeah. I mean, if they engaged in illegal activity, then... It's such a difficult area of law, though, the idea of consent, because as we've seen so often, many women just revoke consent after the fact, and then you get these stories where... That is so messed up. I've seen friends of mine do that, like, years and years later, after having told me stories of some encounter. And then years later, they say that they were raped. And I'm like, wait, that was...

That is the same story you told me 10 years ago. And at the time when you told it to me, it was like sort of an exciting, crazy encounter. And now suddenly you were taken advantage of. It doesn't make any sense. Like you have to. This is why you have to be aware of what you're about. I think this is the problem with repealing the 19th. It doesn't go far enough. We need to actually imprison women until they're 50.

Then they're allowed to enter society. No voting. That's going to make them even weirder. I mean, that girl's going to go to all-girls schools. No, no. That clip is going to get pulled, and they're going to be like, Deadpool wants to lock women up. It's a handmaid's tale.

I wonder, I mean, the thing that struck me, other than the word freak off, which everyone knows, that's the best thing to ever come up with any kind of legal document. To your point, though, I mean, there were reports that at these parties, Diddy would go around drugging people, like shooting them up with ketamine and stuff like that. And again, this comes up to the like... That's illegal to like do ketamine, but...

Did they want ketamine? I mean, I remember being in college and I never mind. Let me remembering she has a son. I don't think he has the password. He doesn't have the password to the members only. But I was at this party and one of the guys at the party had a bunch of had like a vial of liquid acid in a visine dropper. And he was going around like, open your eye, open your eye, open your eye. But I mean, I think everybody knew what it was.

I did, and I was probably the most clueless person there. But again, like, if you're a paid prostitute who's at one of these freak-offs, but you don't really know what you're there for, and then you're also being injected with drugs, like, I don't know. It seems super weird. But there is a question of, like,

Is this full on illegal or is it just that it's kind of gross and we as a culture are not? Well, that's the question. Is it illegal? Did did illegal things happen and people are upset about them? I mean, it seems clear that a lot of these women are upset about it. But of course, none of them really started coming forward until Cassie or whatever came

got some unnamed settlement. And her situation seems very different. She was clearly beat up in a hotel hallway. Like, that's crazy. But it doesn't, like, the other people didn't come forward until after that. These are state or federal? Federal charges, yeah. Well, he's in the MCU. I think that's federal. MCU, it's federal? Then he's going down. The feds don't bring charges unless they win.

It's not about whether you did the crime or not. It's whether they can win. Yeah, that's a cool point. So with like Eric Adams, they're going to win. They always do. Eric Adams is probably going to go down. But what does that say for Trump in the DOJ case, which is the DC J6 case is the last federal case against him.

The DOJ documents case? No, no. That one got tossed by Cannon, and Jack Smith's trying to revive it. But the D.C. J6 case before Tanya Chutkin, I think today was the last day Jack Smith had to file a whole bunch of stuff. Did he? Yeah, I think he did. They don't win that one. I don't think they're going to win. Yeah, but that's desperation. In most other circumstances, they end up winning. You know? I don't know. But I guess the question is, like, does...

do people forgive this? I mean, I feel like there were a lot of people with Epstein who, you know, knew what was going on and either because they were involved, covered up for him or because, you know, maybe sort of out of a streak of puritanism, you know, didn't want to talk about it. And so they didn't give it the attention that it deserved considering how serious the crimes were with this one. Like,

Is it going to just be like, oh, that crazy Diddy, he's so wild, these multimillionaires, or are people going to look at this and be like, we have an entertainment culture that supports really perverse, borderline abusive behaviors, even if they're not directly illegal, it's not necessarily like something that they want to be affiliated with?

But I mean, of course we have an entertainment industry that supports borderline and illegal behavior. Like, obviously we have that. But are people going to care about that? Like, listen to all of the songs, you know? I raped those girls, blah, yay. Like, that's what they do. And do you think the attitude will just remain acceptance or do you think it'll change? Yeah, the attitude will remain acceptance. Look, they locked up Harvey Weinstein and the casting couch is still there. Nothing changed. They brought in intimacy coordinators.

And the casting couch is still there. Like, of course, that's not going to change. So long as there's people who want parts and are willing to, you know, trade sexual favors for them, that's always going to exist. But we also have in the music industry, a lot of stuff is, you know, a lot of illegal stuff is sort of. Church's original recipe is back. You can never go wrong with original.

Still tastes the same like back in the day. Right now, get two pieces of chicken starting at only $2.99 or 10 pieces starting at only $10.99. Churches. Offer valid at participating locations. Um, cordoned? Is that the word?

That's not right. That's like when you separate something. Yeah, that's not the word. But a lot of it is... Part of the industry basis. Yeah, it's part of it. Glorified. There you go. Sanctioned. Sanctioned. Aha. That was the word I was looking for. Sorry. A lot of it is sanctioned.

Even just the way that the contracts are written sort of sanctions crazy behavior. I'm inclined to believe that I think Candace Owens said this. I believe she's right. That rap was intentionally made to glorify degeneracy so that it would destroy the black families and ruin their lives. Because you went from, you know, the famous pictures in the early days of like in the 1900s where you had black families in suits going to church. They had their own economies going, their own businesses going.

And then you get a lot of rap music. And I mean, take a look at like the black church and the tropes about the black community going into the 80s when then things start just devolving into music about banging bitches and doing shots and doing drugs and shooting people. And that becomes their culture. Yeah. And it was really objectifying primarily for black women who suffered, I think, a lot from that.

And who have suffered a lot with the advancement of the welfare state, which destroys black families, takes the fathers out of the home and leaves women responsible for their kids and working a full time job and taking care of the house and everything else. And that's not that's not easy. Well, we were talking about how in Western Maryland you can there's these little communities, there's a big lake and, you know, people go and they play games and they go water skiing and there's this shack here.

You drive up, you walk on in, not a single person there. You grab whatever you want. There's a price on it. You take the money. You either swipe it or tap it on the machine or you stick cash in the box. Sticking cash in the box, you ain't getting change. But, you know, the funny thing is the immediate response from a couple super chats was, I bet it was a 99% white area. Okay, well, it was. But what are you getting at? Huh? That's racist. You can't say that. You can't say that stuff. And then you have Maine. Mm-hmm.

Very low crime in Maine. But this is true, and this is what leads to people wanting race-based policies in the opposite of, or probably in the exact same vein as the left. So when I look at this stuff, I'm like,

When I see woke people who are saying they want policies based on race and laws based on race and all that, and I'm like, they're probably just white supremacists. They're white uppity liberals from well-to-do neighborhoods like this where you don't need anybody at the shack or security or police and nobody steals. And they look at these cities and they're like, oh, look at these poor people. Let's take control of their lives for them.

Yeah. I don't know, man. Where are you currently based out of the Wally? Um, so I'm just traveling a lot. I was just in Thailand for a month and stuff. And if you want to talk about cost of living, like Thailand's incredible. I mean, you get a taxi, like an Uber, they have something else out there. Um, it's called bolt. I don't know if you have that in America. It's literally like, uh,

$2 for like a 30 minute journey. You go to a restaurant, you know, a couple of dollars for food and it's such a great quality of life. And that's how it used to be in the West in the 90s. You know, it was a good time. And, you know, it's when you travel to these other countries, it makes you appreciate what you used to have. And, you know, I think many people are hurting right now with how the economy is.

how the migrant crisis is and people losing their jobs. There are a lot of jobs going overseas and stuff. So, it kind of, for me, it was nostalgic going somewhere like Thailand when people are happy, they're working hard, you don't have all these self checkouts and stuff. It was a nice way of life, no crime, nothing like that and stuff. And like Tim was saying, you've got the stores around here, you can just leave cash. And that's what we need to get back to, when people can trust each other.

Exactly, exactly. But that's unfortunately been broken by all this kind of division. And it's always the white liberal women that are pushing these kind of racial division policies. I don't know, man. I think we need to create a special economic zone that can only be run by women. I think it's a terrible idea. No, it's a great idea. We take maybe like 50 square miles.

And we create a jurisdiction and we call it a special economic zone, kind of like Hong Kong, Macau, you know. And then what we do is we say this is for all the feminists. It's going to be run only by women. And let's see how it turns out. I don't want to go. I didn't say you had to go. I'm saying we're going to let the woke women go and run that place and see what happens. Sounds pretty terrible. I imagine it'll be a lot like an Indian reservation. I bet people will argue all the time.

And then there'll be disagreements over where to put your used tampons. And the whole thing will just go south really fast. It'll subdivide. There'll be like one group ganging up on the other group and they'll be infighting. Right. There'll be a lot of talking behind people's backs. You know, we've done. There'll be tears. There'll be so many tears. We've done so many of these shows where it's like men versus women. But I think we actually need to do a large scale experiment where we create like a 50 mile jurisdiction that's run only by men.

And then it's comparable jurisdiction run only by women. But either men or women are allowed to live in these jurisdictions by choice. And then you see what happens. I have a feeling that the men who live in the women jurisdiction will probably just leave. Yeah.

You think so? Yeah, right away. You don't think they'd just get laid a lot? No. I think they would have a lot of sex. Yes, you would. Why do you think people went to my college? They go to jail. I went to a college that was like 68% women or something. And dudes went there to get dates. And it was very effective for them. And the guy who lives in the woman-run jurisdiction where they have executive authority. Mm-hmm.

is going to bang some woman and then she's going to be sitting there and she's not going to tell people, but people are going to catch on. And then some other woman's going to be like, did you actually bang Rick? He's so fucking gross. No, I didn't. I didn't. I didn't do that. You didn't, but everyone knows you did. Well, I didn't want to. Did he rape you? Yeah, he raped me. And they're going to go, they're going to lock him up. Oh,

Well, that's pretty sad. That's not how it was at Sarah Lawrence in the 90s. Yeah, but men were in charge, right? No, it was mostly women. The administration was mostly women. The police. There weren't any police on our campus. There you go. See, that's what I'm talking about. Yeah, no police. So when you get this, like, so why did that mattress girl blame, accuse the guy of raping her? She got attention for it. Yeah, you know what was weird is how mattress girl then, like, did a reversal and ended up with parties with a bunch of, like, uh,

intellectual dark web people. And it was, yeah, right, right. It was very weird. I was like, why is what she filmed? She, she recreated the rape and she filmed the video and then shared it. Yeah. Like so gross and weird. Yup. And then she was messaging the guy saying, I love you. Please come over. And he was like, I'm not interested. And then she was like, then you're a rapist. So happens. Right. I imagine in the men run society, it's going to be overly stoic and, um,

You don't think there would be a lot of violence? Look at like Lord of the Flies and recreations of same where it does end up violent. Violence would probably happen in the... Actually, no. If you took a bunch of guys from all over the United States and you brought them to the city, there would be no violence. An organizing structure would occur very, very quickly and it would be done without violence. Now...

If it was a real situation where random people were lost in the woods, you'd have violence. In the beginning, guys would fight to assert authority. A posse would form. Beta males would attach to alpha males. And beta is not a derogatory term. People don't understand this. Beta men are lieutenants and generals. Alphas are kings and presidents.

People often insult guys saying you're a beta. And it's like betas are like the ripped guy who's hanging out with the captain of the football team. And they get laid all the time. It's a misconception that people think beta means weak. Omega males are what people refer to as like nerdy, antisocial. So what quickly happens among men is that a power structure forms where people will determine who they trust to be the leader.

And it can be done in several ways, often by pure aggression and violence. But that's probably going to be less likely. A good example of this is I've actually experienced. This is what we do when we play video games, when guys play video games. I'll be playing a team-based video game. We usually just, there's no fight. Five people will be on a team. One of the guys will just be like, all right, guys, we're going to do this run through. I need you to use this weapon and this loadout. And we go, you got it.

Sure. And then if we get wiped and we lose, someone else might go, dude, your plan's not working. I got this. And they go, okay. And so it's, I would say in these games, it's a little bit cooperative. That's nice. They're co-op. It's largely autonomous. So playing a team-based shooter, we expect you to know what to do with the person we've asked you to play. We're playing Overwatch. Okay. Someone's going to play Tracer. We want you to go flank. We're going to storm in.

The person who plays Tracer, you got to make the decisions on yourself. But you have a general idea of what the person who's planning the map. If it fails, then someone might be like, I'm going to try this instead. Okay, let's try this instead. And I think that's largely what you would see in a mail run jurisdiction. It would end up becoming someone would assert authority.

If the person was running things properly and things were improving, people would go along with it and chill the fuck out. If failure started to accrue, you might get coups and power battles. I feel like among the women, it'll start off very nice where they're all nice to each other and shaking hands, and then it'll quickly devolve into factional fighting and disorganization. Well, because women aren't good at letting one person be in charge. I don't know. No, I'm telling you. They say that in boot camp, basic training...

When the men start, they're all fighting with each other, but then by the end, they're all basically figuring out who's who, who's in charge and, you know, the hierarchy. Women start off very, very nice, but in the end, they're all catty and fighting and forming cliques and factions and fighting each other. Yeah, it's like the difference between elementary school and high school. Is that how it goes?

Well, I guess it's sort of all bad, isn't it? I felt like for girls, it's middle school, right? I mean, middle school is brutal. I think there is with men. It's like there's there's an initial like struggle for power, dominance, figure out personalities, but they eventually stratify. And I think this is true of like male friend groups, too. With girls, I feel like the power structure is always sort of in flux at all times. And so with the age age group, it's like elementary school. They hit.

Like puberty, basically, they're in middle school. This sense of like constant turmoil in social structures presents itself. High school, it's a little bit more stable. It might change. And I think this is true of women's friend groups later in life. But boys also like...

Boys will fight each other and then be friends after. Girls will fight each other and then never, like... Very gorgeous for the rest of their life. For the rest of their lives, yeah. 100%. It's fascinating. It's so fun. So many good stories. It's so great. All right, let's go to callers. And we'll start off with none other than Silverblade. Welcome to the show. This is the sound of your ride home with dad after he caught you vaping. Awkward, isn't it?

Most vapes contain seriously addictive levels of nicotine. And, disappointment, know the real cost of vapes. Brought to you by the FDA. Hey there, Tim. How are you guys doing? Doing well. Oh, that's fantastic.

I've honestly watched your show for a long time since probably at least 2017. - Wow, that's good. - And one of the things that came up a while ago, it made me remember something that you said a while, was about the rights that you have inherently to your own person. And your argument was like, if you're stuck in the forest, those are the kind of rights that you inherently have. - Yeah.

I completely agree with that. And you talk about how doctors don't, you can't give anybody health care because you're infringing on someone else's rights to ask them to do that. How would you put that up in the circumstance of the Sixth Amendment where they tell you that you get a public defender that is assigned to you by the states that they are forced to basically

Even if they don't want to do it, they're still forced upon their will to do it for you. So that's that's still within what I've described as the inherent requirements to be secure in your property and your person to survive. And so that is just a structure of if the state seeks to impose restrictions on you, then it also has to provide for you means to be defended from the state. So that's a that's a contingent circumstance.

The right certainly exists, and I recognize it. If a person seeks to, through reason and due process, infringe upon your rights, there has to be a balancing force within that because you must be secure in your person. Otherwise, you will die. If you can't have food, if you can't have property, and if you can't freely live your life, you will just simply starve to death. So...

I think that falls right in line, you know, and beyond that, too, like the 10th and 9th and 10th amendments, powers to the states and all that. Those are just expansions and derivatives of your right to property. If you can't own something, then you'll just starve to death. So these are all like the things we have to do in order to survive as human beings.

Yeah, no, no, that I totally get that. I just was thinking of it in like the same way of if a doctor doesn't want to like work with a patient. So there's obviously people say that some people will say that they have to. It's an inheritance right of them. And right. But public defenders take jobs, you know, like, yeah. So the point I'm making is that if you're in the middle of the woods, you have health care is not a human right because there's no doctor.

What are you going to do now in the instance derivative from the line of being secure in your property? An individual shows up and says through just means I accuse you and seek to infringe upon your right to own property and to freely move to do that would infringe upon your rights. They have to have due process. That's why we have the right to a speedy trial and all these things so that you can be secure in your person just justly.

Within that, it's also implied that if the state is going to hire and pay someone to try and prosecute you, they have to, as a part of that same mechanism, be curtailed in some degree by offering up some form of defense. So that's just a burden on the state seeking to, through due process, infringe upon your rights. It's derivative. You could theoretically make the argument that the state must provide you a doctor, but you're talking about

demanding that someone do labor for you and provide you with cures and medical technology that does not exist. I suppose I would describe the difference as

We create a procedure of rules between ourselves, which is abstract and doesn't require labor. We then determine if we're going to utilize it against you. One element of this must be in your defense and one in your opposition. Whereas with a doctor, you need tools, you need medicine, you need syringes, etc., etc. Those things have to be produced and developed by people. The rules we create in court is just rules we made up. And we're basically saying, if we're going to lock you up, you have a chance to defend yourself. So, you know.

There is an element of if the machine is to exist, then it's got to have people working the machine. You could make an argument on top that, well, then make doctors part of that machine. But the problem still arises in that you have no right to health care because the cure does not exist. And if scientists haven't made the cure, then you have no right to anything. But to reiterate, in the realm of, you know, criminal and civil trials, we made that up.

It's arbitrary. We can easily have someone defend you and try and prosecute you. Ryan Reynolds here from Intmobile. With the price of just about everything going up during inflation, we thought we'd bring our prices down.

down. So to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer, which is apparently a thing. Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium Wireless. How did they get 30, 30, how did they get 30, how did they get 20, 20, 20, how did they get 20, 20, how did they get 15, 15, 15, 15, just 15 bucks a month? Sold! Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront payment equivalent to $15 per month. New customers on first three-month plan only. Taxes and fees extra. Speeds lower above 40 gigabytes each detail.

Okay, yeah, no, that makes sense because I didn't even think about the other part of having the state go against you and having it be like an equal balance upon that. Right.

And this is the problem I have with a lot of the left. They're like, healthcare is a human right. And I'm like, okay, tell me when you've cured AIDS. Because right now there's no right to healthcare for people with AIDS. Like, fuck off. You can't cure it. And then if someone spends a million dollars to find a cure, and they're like, we've made one. Who gets it? It's a human right. Everybody gets it. No, there's only one. Fuck off. You know? Well, there is kind of the... I mean, they can... They do have drugs that push it into remission. But...

My point is that, let's say there's a, you know, what's that thing that What's-Her-Face has? That singer? She's turned into a statue? Stiff person syndrome. Celine Dion. No cure for it. Where's your fucking human right now? It doesn't exist!

And then if someone's going to invent it and they're going to be like, for a million dollars, we can cure this, she'll buy it for sure. But what about everybody else? It's a human right, right? Well, it's a bit like price gouging as well. You know, like we were saying earlier, in some countries, the cost of a specific medicine, like a Zempik, if you've got diabetes, is super expensive. Other countries, it's a lot cheaper. And, you know, you need to make it fair for everybody because you can't have somebody that's...

that's not earning much money, they can't afford the medicine, but then someone's a millionaire, they can get access to it. If there was infinite Ozempic and it grew on trees abundantly and it was so abundant we had to dispose of it, fine, it should be for everybody. If it flowed freely in the hills and through the streams and you could walk up and just grab a bucket and take it and it was so abundant, fine. But people have to invent these things. And the invention requires labor, the processing of chemicals, and...

There's a finite amount. There was a story where a kid had a genetic disorder. It could be cured. It was a million dollar treatment, a gene therapy. And the family demanded the state pay for it. And they were like, there are like four of these treatments available right now. Why do you get it? And they're like, we demand it because our kid could be cured. And it's like, sure, we can. And it's a million dollars to perform the procedure and have all the people working on it. It's not a right. Anyway, is there anything else you wanted to add, sir?

No, that should do it. I completely agree with what you said. I just didn't even think about the other side. I was just so focused on basically the idea of forcing someone to do labor against their will if they didn't want to do it for that one particular person. Yeah, the bigger component of the doctor argument is that doctors require special practices, tools, and cures that don't exist. And so you're creating a whole network of slaves to give people health care as a human right.

But anyway, man, thanks for calling in. Is there anything you want to shout out before you go? Yeah, just my wife. It's her birthday coming up. It's not exactly her birthday yet, but I just want to basically shout her out, say thank you for everything she does and helping her raise our now six-month-old boy. Right on. Happy Emma's birthday. Yeah. Thanks for calling in. Okay, bye. All right, let's grab Turtle Burger next. Turtle Burger, that sounds...

Either good or not good. I don't know. Well, there's some turtle jerky over here. I can't eat it. It's got a bunch of weird stuff in it. Yeah, I don't want to eat it either. It's got teriyaki sauce in it. Is that actually a thing made of turtle? Yeah, you want some? No, no, I'm vegetarian, but I didn't know that was a thing you could eat. Yeah. How's it going, Turtle Burger? What up? Oh, very good, everyone. Um...

First time caller. I've only listened for a short bit, only since the spin the UFO was a thing. That's since the beginning. Yeah. So my question is for everyone. This is about the Florida shooter. So you've had multiple guests and highly informed guests come on and they mention how easy it is to...

blackmail and frame people with the position of child porn. Do you think the second shooter actually had child porn or was it a play for them to snatch him up before Florida could get him for their investigation? I think he had it. Yeah, they took forever to get into Crooks' phone, but it seems like they got this stuff pretty quick. We know that we are in opposition to a network of pedophiles like Epstein, his clients, and all that stuff. So when it turned out that the guy who tried to kill Trump's son was a pedophile, I'm like, well, you know, that is who we oppose. They are very mad about it. Mm-hmm.

Makes sense. I don't know if it has anything... I mean, there is an argument that the son has child porn and is a pedophile and his dad is just also a whack job but not in that particular vice. You know, I think...

You know, it's interesting to me that the story was they were already tracing this thing. And we might never have heard about this case in North Carolina, except for the fact that the man arrested is the son of the man who just tried to potentially attack Donald Trump on the golf course. So that is where I get to be like, I think crazy runs in families. But I don't know that Ryan Routh himself was blackmailed over these things.

Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I keep being surprised that there's, you know, we cover it up, the post-millennial will be like teacher arrested on child pornography charges or, you know, somebody else arrested for, you know. I've been following this case involving Stefan Stearns. No. He's accused of murdering his stepdaughter who he had pornographic images of. And he's not even like officially her stepdad. He's like the mom's boyfriend. I don't know how you do this. I've talked to friends of mine who have...

who are divorced and they're raising their daughters and they're like, you know, they're interested in like finding somebody else. But it's like, how do you bring some man into the house who, when you have daughters, like that's just really creepy and kind of, you know, that's kind of a problem. Like how would you be sure that some fella you brought home after like dating for six months or whatever, um,

you know, or maybe he like comes over and has dinner with your family. Like, how would you know that he's not just there to like mess with your kids? There are horrible stories about this, right? Well, people are horrifying, you know, and it's like,

It's so unfathomable that this is something that somebody would be interested in. I mean, so exploitative and horrible. Yeah, it's terrible. Yeah. So I keep being surprised. And then Tim's like, you know, it's a network of pedos. And the more you look at it, you're like, why are all these people pedos? Like all of them. And what's his name?

The president. What's his name? Joe Biden. That guy? Yeah, him. He goes around sniffing everybody, talking about little girls and stuff. It's so disgusting and creepy. And then you look at his kids and his kids are fucked up, you know? And it's like you look at the daughter's diary and like, that's not good. It's just, these people are not good people. Yeah. Mm-hmm.

But no, I did not read about that horrible, disgusting man who murdered his stepdaughter because allegedly, to be fair, he hasn't tried yet. But I highly recommend looking at case because it gets I'll tell you more off air. It gets weirder and weirder. Is there anything you want to add or anything you want to shout out? No, no, no. That was great. I thought I was going to get a yes or no, but we got a whole puddle rabbit hole. So indeed, nothing more to add. Right on. Well, thanks for calling in. All right. Next up, we got Crown Doors. Crown Doors, you are on the show.

Hey, good evening, everybody. What's up? So, you know, given the media's ability to influence and manipulate markets, policy, and society, shouldn't we consider it necessary that the media have some form of, like, fiduciary duty or Hippocratic oath that holds them legally accountable for misinformation just beyond litigation that's hurting an individual or a business? What's misinformation?

Like they should swear an oath to the constitution and not to lie? They should have their own version of the Hippocratic oath. I mean, that's the thing though. Like if we had to create one now, you know, I've assumed some left wing, uh,

News watch or organization would create it and then force everyone to swear to it and it's actually like you must present information Provided that it supports diverse and then we don't get to talk about you know problems with the election We don't get to talk about problems with vaccines and we don't get to talk about how all the leaders are interested in child pornography We don't get to talk about the weird stuff in our food or how fluoride is bad or how the CDC is manipulating everybody

And the problem with the media as well is who defines misinformation? You've got all these fact checkers and stuff, you know, they're typically have a left wing bias. And, you know, of course, sometimes they're checking things that are false. And, you know, X is a great example. We have community notes. That's people from different backgrounds, you know,

different political beliefs, they're doing fact-checkings, but you have a lot of these media outlets that kind of, it's activism. You know, a lot of these fact-checkers are activists trying to push a specific agenda. So that's the issue is who defines misinformation? Because, you know, the MSNBC can say something that is completely shocking or when they try to deny, you know, with the, trying to say that some of the Joe Biden videos were like deep cheap fakes. Mm-hmm.

You know, when everybody's seen that with their eyes, you know, they can say that's misinformation. No, every media outlet's going to have a different definition.

Get softer, smoother, and more even-toned skin after just one use with the new Gentle Exfoliating Line from Cetaphil. Formulated with a unique triple acid blend that promotes surface skin cell renewal, these gentle chemical exfoliators remove dead skin cells and refine skin's texture while hydrating, resulting in softer, smoother, more even-looking skin. Shop the new Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating Line in the face and body aisles at your local Target store or online at cetaphil.com. Yeah.

That's the problem. I just feel like the next world war is going to be started by the media through misinformation. I think all the wars were. It would be nice. I totally understand. I wish we could have them all swear to a standard, but part of this is the need for a strong culture that has...

moral values that everyone agrees to and doesn't feel like, well, I'm the special exception and I should get to release this information. It's about integrity. You know, journalists used to have a lot of integrity and now, sadly, a lot of them have become activists because if you look at who's paying these networks, you now have George Soros has basically been cleared to buy 200

radio stations across the US, you know, that is obviously going to affect the reporting. And it shouldn't be like that. You should be reporting the facts, you know, keeping your political bias out of it. But these shows on CNN, it's basically, you know, it's just an opinion show. It's not reporting the news. It's an opinion-based news. And, you know, that's not good. People need to see both sides. The viewer needs to be making their own decision based on all the facts presented from both sides. Yeah.

Part of the problem, too, is that everybody used to have a lot of integrity. The Hippocratic Oath used to have integrity, right? And doctors would swear to uphold it and do no harm. And now doctors do no harm all over the place. Just ask Ali, you know, I mean, doctors come in and they're like, oh, you think you are a man. Let us cut off your breasts, even though you're 15 years old. That is a great idea. There's no integrity in that.

There's no integrity in a lot of medicine. There's no integrity in journalism. There's no integrity in politics. I think these people are just Darwinists, and their attitude is like, thank God people stupid enough to sterilize themselves can't have kids. Yeah, well, there's no integrity in that either. Right. They don't care. They're Malthusian. So saying, like, let's have— If it's an accident, then it's literally making sure that only the people who are smart enough to retain their ability to reproduce, reproduce.

This episode is brought to you by Financial Times. When it comes to voicing or acting on our opinions, why are some people more confident than others? With the Financial Times, you form your own opinions with conviction based on unbiased and trusted reporting. FT journalists tackle global issues with an impartial and rigorous mindset, providing the facts and analysis that you need to make up your own mind. Make up your own mind with Financial Times. Visit ft.com slash the journal to read free articles and subscribe.

So it's not just a problem of journalists, is what I'm saying.

A lot of institutions. I mean, media has always been a problem. But it's a lot of institutions that, you know, previously were credible for integrity, like the United Nations. Now they've become very farcical. Of course, you have a lot of universities as well with the handling of all of these protests, on-campus protests last year, you know, and not taking decisive action, then siding with the activists. It's like, you know, these were once great institutions that people respected, and now people are questioning that integrity. And I think that's

That's the problem. A lot of people just don't value that anymore. Even the presidency, you know, it's become, you know, for the world looking at Biden, it's become a joke and it's not good, you know, when you've got an institution like the White House that was so respected, Congress so respected. And then you have, you know, Biden when he had that little desk and, you know, he's just... Oh, the little IKEA desk. I mean, it's just like...

You should be respecting that institution. You should have respect for the president. And when you have somebody that's basically making a mockery of that, it's, you know, we've lost that integrity. It's very sad. Anything else you want to add?

Two things real quick. First, I've heard through the grapevines that they're going to be playing your new song tonight at midnight, Tim, on the After Dark show with Carter and Kent, if anyone's going to be hanging around there for that. The other thing...

I keep hearing you guys mentioning all the assassination attempts, but I think everyone's forgetting the Mar-a-Lago raid. Because I remember the Secret Service had opposing agencies coming in there with their own guns, right? And they had standard authorization for the use of lethal force. Yeah, because I keep hearing about Trump's... It's Trump's own fault that he...

He's getting these assassination attempts because he's the threat. But isn't that the same thing as saying a young woman who's being assaulted, it's her own fault for dressing that way, like blaming the victim? Isn't that essentially what they're doing here? Yeah, but they're hypocrites, so, you know, that's what we expect. Anyway, yeah. Anyway, thank you for taking my call. Have a good evening. Right on. Thanks for calling in. Thank you. And last but not least, we have Admorius. What is up? Hey, how's it going, guys?

Thanks for taking my call. I've been watching for about a year. First time caller. I'm usually out on the road driving a truck. So this is the first time I get to call in. Welcome. Right on. I have a question for the panel.

so these last couple weeks during the nato talks about the authorization of ukraine's use of western long-range munitions to strike russia russia has updated its nuclear doctrine to state that any attack on russia by a non-nuclear power that is supported by a nuclear power will be viewed as a joint attack and an act of war and putin seems to imply that there would be nuclear retaliation what are your thoughts on this situation and how do we avoid a nuclear war

Yeah, I think this is I think this is really interesting. You probably saw today that Biden Harris administration authorized another what was it, eight billion dollars in weapons and stuff to go to Biden.

to fight this war. You have Trump saying that he would not have this war at all, that he would find a way to like end it right away. When it was the beginning of this conflict, what was it, February 2022, and the U.S. started sending weapons and stuff to Ukraine, like ammunition, you know, smaller stuff like that. Putin said that he did not see that as an act of aggression by the U.S. against Russia. He was very clear on that.

You had Biden make a lot of promises, you know, no tanks, no F-16s, no long range missiles, no troops on the ground and no something else to like cluster bombs or something like that. We've broken all of them. And as part of the deal today, they're sending long range weapons. Putin has been very clear that like that would be that Western missiles landing in Russia would be an act of war. And I think that.

war is exactly what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are looking for. Hillary Clinton effectively said in the debates in 2015, 2016, she would declare war on Russia. Yeah. And this is what they are interested in doing. She was told by our generals at the time, a no-fly zone in Syria is a declaration of war. And on the debate stage, she basically said, so what? Yeah, exactly. And, you know, people were talking...

like a year or so ago about there should be a no-fly zone over Ukraine, which of course means that we would shoot down your plane, which would be an act of war. So I think that everything that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been doing in this administration, you know, Kamala Harris talking about how Ukraine is definitely going to join NATO, um,

Sending the weapons now, this this notion of sending long range weapons, I think that they are designed and intended to court war with Russia in terms of trying to avoid war. We need to elect leadership that is opposed to war.

engaging in this war. Which is Trump. Which is really Trump. Trump is the only anti-war president. Despite what they say about him being the bringer of doom and the embodiment of political violence, he's always been clear on the Russia-Ukraine issue. I mean, I think he couldn't have been more powerful than at that CNN town hall when she kept...

pushing him to to say oh do you want russia to win or do you want ukraine and he said i want people to stop i want people to stop dying and like what is it's like millions of ukrainians have died they're pushing people who are unfit to serve in combat into combat um it's just a really yeah it's really yeah it's a thousand per day serge is saying it's like it's really a devastating um devastating situation

Yep. So I don't I don't think that I think that voting for Democrats is a way to encourage war and voting for Republicans at this point who are populist Republicans is a way to, you know, avoid war. Did I say avoid war the first time to know? You said Democrats are going to make war happen. Yeah. Yeah. I think Putin will use nukes if pushed to it. Yeah.

It just got to be an existential threat. Putin's going to like Ukraine invaded Russia. If U.S. missiles are being launched in, Putin's outright like that's the U.S. attacking me. So I think tactical nukes comes first. We'll start seeing big explosions in the battlefield.

And then who knows? People in the United States who keep voting Democrat are really dumb. They think nukes are basically ICBMs. They don't understand that Russia could launch a nuclear artillery that's like a 100 kiloton bomb and then just wipe out a whole portion of the battlefield like that if they wanted to. This is the crazy thing. They're like, Russia's losing. Russia has not yet begun the fight. Russia could at any point unleash nuclear artillery and start just flattening the entire eastern region of Ukraine if they wanted to. But...

The West wants to crush Russia, and so they're pushing it. We'll see what happens. It's crazy. Is there anything else you wanted to add, sir? Yeah, I was just going to add it. It does seem like NATO doesn't really care that Russia has nuclear weapons. And my question would then also be, like, if Trump doesn't win, would it be incumbent on we the people to stop them from engaging in nuclear exchange? Oh, you're saying, like, you want to go and join the international coalition in Ukraine to fight Russia? Yeah.

No, I mean like stop our government from pushing. Well, our government's not going to use. It's like Ukraine's going to do whatever the fuck they want, even if the United States government stops supporting it. Right. I just hope this all blows over. It's scaring the hell out of me. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think it's going to blow over, though. Nope. I don't. Yeah. Yeah.

Like even if even if Trump wins, some frogmen can go out there and just blow up a bunch of Russian shit and then start a war. Whether Trump wants it or not. So I don't know. Buy food and buy gold. But you want to shout anything out before we go? Yeah, I just wanted to shout out the Sean Ryan show. He does a lot of great things for this country and the veteran community with his podcast. And it's really good stuff. Right on. Well, thank you, good sir, for calling in. Thank you. All right.

All right, Ali, it's been fun. Appreciate you coming in. Thanks for having me, guys, and loving the new studio. It's brilliant. Great, right? Yeah. All right, everybody, tomorrow morning, we've got, let me, how do you say this? Michael Francesi? Francesi? Is that how you say it? He's a mob guy. We're going to be hanging out with Shane in the Culture War podcast, youtube.com slash timcast, because I am of the opinion that the mafia is better than what we have now.

You know, I don't know, whatever. It's whatever you think. So that'll be fun. And then tomorrow night, Riley Moore is joining us. He's based. Maybe we'll get him to come a little bit earlier and land a kickflip. It'll be fun. All right, everybody. Thanks for hanging out. We'll be back tomorrow morning for the Culture War. We'll see y'all then.