cover of episode The Problem with Erik | Update: Judge Orders a New Trial

The Problem with Erik | Update: Judge Orders a New Trial

2024/9/20
logo of podcast Texas Monthly True Crime: The Problem With Erik

Texas Monthly True Crime: The Problem With Erik

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
K
Katie Vine
Topics
Katie Vine: 播客节目"The Problem with Eric"关注的埃里克·蒙德谋杀案出现了戏剧性转折。最初,蒙德及其同案犯因密谋谋杀罪被判处无期徒刑。然而,美国地方法官威廉·坎贝尔下令重审此案。法官的命令长达32页,但核心内容是一句话:由于行政失误,陪审团在审议时收到了未被正式采纳的证据。这些证据包括九份检方提供的证物,例如短信、照片、录音和银行记录,这些证据并未在法庭上正式出示。此外,一份应该部分删除的证物未经删除就提交给了陪审团,而另外三份应该提交但未提交的证物则包括电话记录、短信和埃里克·蒙德住所的航拍录像。法官认为,虽然此类错误并非首次发生,但这次错误可能影响了判决结果,构成罕见的结构性错误。有趣的是,法官的命令暗示,如果不是得克萨斯月刊等媒体机构要求获取案件证物副本,法院工作人员可能不会注意到这个错误。检方有30天的时间对法官的命令提出上诉,如果不上诉,新的审判很可能在2025年进行。在此之前,蒙德及其同案犯仍将继续服刑。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Texas Monthly. Hi, it's Katie Vine. I wanted to check back in with you to share a development in the case at the heart of our show, The Problem with Eric. In the show's last episode, I told you about the weeks Anna and I spent in court at the trial for the murders of Holly Williams and Bill Lanway. At the end of the trial, three men were convicted of conspiring in murder for hire. Brian Brockway and Adam Carey, who were accused of carrying out the murders, and Eric Mond, who was accused of paying for them.

They faced mandatory life in prison. The only thing left was a hearing where they'd be formally sentenced. Finally, the story had an ending. Except, not quite. This week we got some stunning news: the judge ordered a new trial. This was a surprise because after watching the whole trial, I hadn't seen anything suggesting impropriety. But according to U.S. District Judge William Campbell, it turns out the jury in the case got to see some evidence it shouldn't have.

The order is 32 pages long, but it boils down to a one-sentence explanation. The judge wrote, "An administrative mistake caused certain exhibits not admitted into evidence to be given to the jury as it began deliberations." Here are the specifics. He says that due to the error, the jury saw nine exhibits from the prosecution — text messages, photos, recordings, and bank records — that hadn't been formally introduced in court.

Another exhibit that should have been partially redacted went to the jury without redactions. Then there were also three exhibits the jury should have received but didn't. These included some other phone records and texts and aerial surveillance footage of Eric Mahon's home.

The judge wrote, "This isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened, and it won't be the last. Usually the error is harmless, but in this case it might have made a difference." This, the judge said, amounted to a structural error in the case, something incredibly rare. Interestingly, the order suggests court staff might not have noticed the mistake if it weren't for requests from media outlets, like Texas Monthly, to get copies of the exhibits in the case.

The prosecution has 30 days to appeal the judge's order. If they don't, the court will likely schedule the new trial for some time in 2025. Until then, Eric Mond and the rest of the defendants remain in prison. We'll be watching the case and have more for you here. Thanks for listening.