B
Brian Redan
S
Sarah Koenig
辩
辩护律师
Sarah Koenig：本集探讨了戴文·霍姆斯案，一个因缺乏确凿证据而最终撤销指控的案件。检方最初依靠匿名线人和园林工的证词，但这些证据的可信度存疑。一个意外获得的电话录音最终导致案件撤销，也提供了新的调查方向。本案反映了刑事司法系统中证据不足、匿名线人证词不可靠以及检察官权力过大的问题。
Brian Redan：作为本案的检察官，Redan详细解释了案件的调查过程，包括最初的线索、证人证词以及最终导致案件撤销的电话录音。他强调了调查的复杂性以及在证据不足的情况下做出决定的困难。他承认系统存在缺陷，但同时也强调了他致力于为受害者家属争取正义。
Devon Homes：作为案件的被告，Homes被错误地指控了一年，最终被无罪释放。他的经历突显了刑事司法系统中可能发生的错误以及对个人生活造成的巨大影响。
John：作为一名证人，John提供了关于Devon Homes的信息，但他的证词缺乏可信度，因为他提到的其他一些人似乎与Devon Homes没有关联。
Landscaper：作为一名关键证人，Landscaper的证词一度让检察官相信他们找到了正确的人，但最终电话录音推翻了这一结论。
Young man：电话录音中提到的年轻男子，他似乎与案件有关联，但拒绝与警方合作。
Charles Wakefield：作为受害者家属，Wakefield表达了他对案件结果的看法，以及他对正义的期待。
Sarah Koenig: This episode explores the case of Devon Homes, which was ultimately dismissed due to a lack of conclusive evidence. The prosecution initially relied on anonymous informants and the testimony of a landscaper, but the credibility of this evidence was questionable. An unexpectedly obtained phone recording ultimately led to the dismissal of the case, and also provided a new direction for the investigation. This case reflects the problems of insufficient evidence, unreliable testimony from anonymous informants, and excessive power of prosecutors in the criminal justice system.
Brian Redan: As the prosecutor in this case, Redan detailed the investigation process, including initial leads, witness testimony, and the phone recording that ultimately led to the dismissal of the case. He emphasized the complexity of the investigation and the difficulty of making decisions with insufficient evidence. He acknowledged flaws in the system, but also stressed his commitment to seeking justice for the victim's family.
Devon Homes: As the defendant in the case, Homes was wrongly accused for a year and ultimately acquitted. His experience highlights the mistakes that can occur in the criminal justice system and the enormous impact on personal lives.
John: As a witness, John provided information about Devon Homes, but his testimony lacked credibility because some of the other people he mentioned did not seem to be connected to Devon Homes.
Landscaper: As a key witness, the landscaper's testimony once led prosecutors to believe they had found the right person, but the phone recording ultimately overturned this conclusion.
Young man: The young man mentioned in the phone recording, he seems to be connected to the case, but refused to cooperate with the police.
Charles Wakefield: As a victim's family member, Wakefield expressed his views on the outcome of the case, and his expectations for justice.
Deep Dive
The case against Davon Homes initially seemed strong with various tips and a credible witness, but it ultimately fell apart due to new exonerating evidence.
- Initial evidence included anonymous tips and a jailhouse statement from a known associate.
- A landscaper's identification further solidified the case against Davon.
- A crucial phone call revealed that Davon was not present at the crime scene, leading to his release.
Shownotes Transcript
Don’t tell the judges, but the prosecutors have the most power in the building.
To get full access to this show, and to other Serial Productions and New York Times podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts).
To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter.)
Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at [email protected]