It's time to review the highlights. I'm joined by my co-anchor, Snoop. Hey, what up, dawg? Snoop number one has to be getting the new iPhone 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence at T-Mobile. Yeah, you should hustle down at T-Mobile like a dog chasing a squirrel, chasing a nut. That's a nice analogy, Snoop. On to highlight number two, if T-Mobile families can save 20% every month versus the other big guys. Very impressive. Take it away, Snoop. Head to T-Mobile.com and get the new iPhone 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence on them. Now drop that jingle.
See how you can save versus the other big guys at T-Mobile.com slash switch. Apple intelligence coming fall 2024. Silicon Valley Bank is still the SVB you know and trust. The SVB that delivers human-focused, specialized lending and financial solutions to their clients. The SVB that can help take you from startup to scale up. The SVB that can help your runways lead to liftoff.
The only difference? Silicon Valley Bank is now backed by the strength and stability of First Citizens Bank. Yes, SVB. Learn more at svb.com slash vox.
Welcome to the PropG Pod's Office Hours. This is the part of the show where we answer questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. Hey, PropG. Hey, Scott and team. Hey, Scott. Hi, PropG. Hey, PropG. Hey, Prof G. Hi, Professor G. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehoursofpropgmedia.com. Again, that's officehoursofpropgmedia.com. So with that, first question.
Hey, Prof. This is Jack coming to you from horse and bourbon country in Lexington, Kentucky. My question today is about non-compete clauses. I work in medical device sales, specifically in spine surgery. And so because I have a highly specialized field, I'm subject to a non-compete clause in my employment contract. And so my question to you is, from a personal level, is this even going to affect me, the supposed Lena Kahn and FTC ban on non-competes?
I saw on the news recently that the ban was upheld in the courts and is supposed to go into effect in a couple months. So does that mean that all of our existing contracts are now void? And how do you differentiate between giving employees the freedom to strike it out on their own and build something for themselves versus maybe switching companies and taking very, very protected IP with them and leaving the door open for IP lawsuits left and right?
And apart from all of that, will this even matter? Is it ever going to come into effect or will it be stuck in litigation for years and years until maybe Trump gets elected and fires Lena Kahn and we all pretend this never happened? I'd be curious to hear your thoughts and I appreciate all of your content. Thanks for the interesting question. So what are non-competes? They're labor contracts that prohibit workers from taking a new job with competitors or starting a competing business.
during a set amount of time after their employment with a company. This can sometimes be years long. Typically, though, if you go on what's called garden leave or non-compete, they have to pay you during that time. Sometimes, though, a non-compete can mean you just can't go to work for anyone who is considered a competitor. According to the FTC, nearly one in five Americans, about 30 million people, are subject to non-compete agreements. Many experts believe non-compete agreements are behind the stagnation in middle-class income workers' pay.
The FTC ban on non-compete agreements is scheduled to take effect this fall on September the 4th. According to the FTC, the new ban on the non-competes could lead to the creation of 8,500 new businesses per year and wage increases totaling $300 billion per year. President Biden fully supports a ban on non-compete agreements, saying that they are designed simply to lower people's wages. So what will happen to your non-compete contract?
According to the FTC, existing non-competes for the vast majority of workers will no longer be enforceable after the rules of fact update. Existing non-competes for senior executives who represent less than 0.75% of workers can remain enforced under the FTC's final rule, but employers are banned from entering into or attempting to enforce any new non-competes, even if they involve senior executives.
Okay, so my view on this is non-competes are horrible for the economy.
And I there are a few things I love more about the Biden administration and the competent people they hire that don't end up in jail or don't end up, I don't know, saying their boss is an idiot than what he has done at the DOJ and the FTC with Lena Kahn and Jonathan Cantor. So let's look very meta. Corporate profits have been an all time high, an all time high.
Meanwhile, wages as a percent of GDP have been flat for 40 years. Consumers or workers have not gotten a raise unless they're in the top kind of 10%. Why? Because every fucking thing we do is a transfer of work and time, i.e. money, from young to old, poor to rich, and from workers to shareholders. There's a healthy tension between capital and labor. And during, for example, the 60s and 70s, it got out of control and labor became too profitable and there were no profits anymore.
In corporations, the stock market went sideways, hugely mediocre returns for the better part of 20 years, and it was hard to attract investment capital and grow. And so labor had too much power, and there was a serious...
regulation, the activist investor popped up, and since then, since then, Washington has been weaponized by corporations, and almost everything that happens favors the corporation and shareholders. And this is all tied back to compensation that has increasingly been focused on shareholders. The result is a war on labor, and non-competes are a manifestation of that. Do you realize there are now sanitation workers, i.e. trash men, and even hairstylists that are subject to non-competes? These are total
total bullshit. Now, if you're a very senior level executive that is making millions of dollars and has access to the most sensitive IP of the company, those non-competes will still be enforceable for a while. I get that. I get that. If you're the one top engineer figuring out an LLM for Meta,
And Microsoft calls and says, wow, we'll pay you $50 million. Maybe you should be forced to take a year or two year off because of the IP. However, however, confidentiality and NDAs cover that type of IP theft. It's not like it's IP theft Lollapalooza. I've been subject to non-competes. When my company, L2, was acquired by Gartner, they had two forms of retention. One was a non-compete. And as soon as I said, I am out of here, I hated here. And that's being generous, saying hate.
They immediately started sending me nasty grams on legal letterhead saying, if you do anything that competes with Gartner, anything at all, we're going to sue you to the ends of the earth. The better way to create a non-compete is, quite frankly, is money. And they did that as well. And it's one of the reasons I hung around for 14 months, not 14 days. Let's just say it was a cultural misfit.
The dog in a large corporation headquartered in Connecticut. Good people, just not my people, if you will. And I wasn't theirs. Anyways, this is an outstanding move by the FTC and by the Biden administration. This transfers some of the power, some of the economic well-being back to the people.
to labor. Who are you most worried about? Shareholders or a single mother who's a hairdresser who can't go to another fucking hair salon because she signed a non-compete in order to feed her and her family? This is total bullshit. This is what government is supposed to do. Non-disclosure agreements? No fucking way.
This is wonderful legislation. They should have never existed. You want people to stay with your company. Then here's an idea. Pay your people. That was indignant. All right. Question number two. Hey, Prof G. This is Kevin from Boston. Huge fan. Been listening to you and following you since your now infamous WeWork article. A lot of the things you say about, you know,
So the country, the markets, being a father, being a man, just really resonate with me. And I really appreciate all you do there. My question is around this concept of surveillance pricing. I'm not sure you've seen it, but the Federal Trade Commission issued an order against eight companies that offer products and services that incorporate data about consumers' characteristics and behavior that determine what they end up getting charged, right?
It's not a surprise that this sort of practice happens in the general market. But I'm curious to hear your take on whether or not you think this is illegal. The Federal Trade Commission should kind of opine on it or what they should focus on. I know you're a big advocate for higher regulation. Very curious to hear your take and appreciate your response to what you do.
That's a really interesting question. The FTC has ordered eight companies to provide information on how they use personal data to set prices based on individual shopper characteristics. The FTC aims to understand the surveillance pricing market where the consumer data, including credit card information, location, and browsing history, may lead to different prices for the same product.
I'm curious why McKinsey & Company is involved there.
I have two minds here. I think this happens all the time. I think if you're browsing or coming into a site from one site that says you're probably a certain consumer, I think they can do variable real-time pricing. There's real-time pricing based on when you buy. Think about pricing discrimination of an airline. If I want to fly...
Friday to Sunday, last minute, I may pay four, six, eight times the price for the exact same seat as someone who booked three weeks before and is staying more than seven days because clearly they've figured out, all right, I'm a business traveler, which means someone else is paying, which means I'm fairly price insensitive.
So there's all sorts of discriminatory pricing. It happens. Prices change on hotel sites, I've noticed. The thing I really don't like, which I think is illegal, when I bought football tickets for Premier League, I'll be shopping for tickets, I'll put them in my cart, I'll wait a minute and they'll say, oh, I'm about to check out. The price has gone up. I think that is probably illegal and those companies will probably get swiftly fined.
I don't know, punished, if you will, as they should. But I believe the price discrimination should be legal. You know, I mean, to a certain extent, I used to get student discounts. Is that surveillance pricing, where you know someone is a student, so you offer them a discount? Seniors, you know, they do it by age. They do all sorts of stuff that, quote, unquote, leverages your personal data to give you different pricing. I'm in favor of competition, breaking these guys up, not over-regulating how they determine their pricing.
So I'm sort of on the side of businesses a little bit here that should have the opportunity to charge a business person more. But I do think most of these problems go away if you just have more competition. And as a rule, they're charging everyone less money because they know, you know, their competitors, B, C, and D, will do the same.
I think this will be interesting. I appreciate the question. Sorry, it's not a more thoughtful question. But in sum, I think pricing discrimination and different prices for different people has been going on forever and will continue to go on one way or another. What we need is more competitors in the marketplace. Thanks for the question. We have one quick break before our final question. Stay with us.
Your business deploys AI pilots everywhere. But are they going anywhere? Or are they stuck in silos, exhausting resources, unable to scale? Maybe you don't need hundreds of AI pilots. You need a holistic strategy.
IBM has 65,000 consultants with Gen AI expertise who can help you design, integrate, and optimize AI solutions. So you're not just deploying AI, you're scaling it across your business. Learn more at ibm.com slash consulting. IBM, let's create. Think scaling AI is hard? Think again. With Watson X, you can deploy AI across any environment.
Above the clouds, helping pilots navigate flights. And on lots of clouds, helping employees automate tasks. On-prem, so designers can access proprietary data. And on the edge, so remote bank tellers can assist customers. Watson X works anywhere, so you can scale AI everywhere.
Learn more at ibm.com slash WatsonX. IBM, let's create. Creativity is one of the core traits that makes us human. It allows us to tell stories, to create, and to solve problems in new and exciting ways. So why does it feel so threatened? With new technological advances that can create art in milliseconds, where does that leave us? In this special three-part series, we wanted to ask, how can we save and celebrate creativity?
Tune into Saving Creativity, a special series from The Gray Area sponsored by Canva. You can find it on The Gray Area feed wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back. Question number three. Hey, Scott. Mickey here from Denver, Colorado. I love listening to your show, not just because of the content, but because of the way it's delivered. You have an authentic style, and it keeps the listeners coming back for more.
A few episodes ago, you mentioned that it took you a long time to find out that storytelling was one of your core competencies. I was fascinated by that because I'd never heard it described as a core competency before. So here's what I'd like to know.
What was your journey like? How did you get from being a timid rambler to the expert storyteller you are today? What advice do you have for those of us who want to add storytelling to our set of skills? And finally, how do you take an abstract talent like storytelling and turn it into a practical skill for building a business? Thanks for all the inspiration. Can't wait to hear what's next.
Mickey from Denver, your voice sounds like it was generated by AI, but it's nice. You could do voiceovers. You could do like a local dealership. You could be like, hi, this is Mickey from Ford of Basalt, Colorado. Come on in to check out our new F-150 Lightning. Anyways, you have a nice voice. Okay, what was the question? Storytelling. The first time I kind of noticed it was when I was eight. And that was my father. I just started...
recognizing that people seem to gather around my father and were just enthralled by him. Whatever room he went into, a semicircle would form around him. And I remember asking my mom, why do people like dad so much? And she said, he's charming.
And my dad has this Scottish accent and is funny and has a strong jawline. He's quite handsome. And he would tell these stories and these jokes and a twist of phrase. And then he would do what is the easiest way to get people to laugh at your joke. He would bust out in laughter after he ended his joke. And he also had a good turn of phrase. He was thought of himself as kind of a big picture thinker. And he would have people over and regal them with stories about
you know, what is the key to a successful management? It's a good job description. And he, I just noticed very early that kind of storytelling and being able to hold a room was really important. And then it wasn't really storytelling, but I wasn't
In kind of junior high school and high school, I was exceptionally tall, exceptionally thin, and I had really bad skin. And that wasn't a recipe for getting a ton of dates. And I found that my ability to get a date or have someone hang out with me or have friends hang out with me was a specific form of storytelling, and that was humor. And I really spent a lot of time thinking about, not thinking about, but trying to be funny. I won awards.
Most comical and Steve Martin. I'm dating myself in my high school poll, which is kind of a thing around storytelling. I didn't really decide I was going to be a great storyteller. And the first time I thought I might have a talent for this was.
was in graduate school, I was selected. I love this because I get to talk about me. In graduate school from Berkeley, I was selected as the student speaker to give the commencement speech at our graduation ceremony. Other people recognizing that you have a decent gift to give makes you think, wow, maybe I could make a living at this. But I never even then thought of myself as a storyteller or someone who's going to make a living there. But what has really helped me is I would say there's really kind of, there's a few things. One is, I think to be a great storyteller is
You need to be a competent writer. I think writing, the ability to write and string together your thoughts and long-form writing helps organize and kind of really strain the muscle. I think writing is the most difficult thing I do.
but it damages the muscle and it grows back stronger across all communication. I think that is the base. If you show me an incredible storyteller, I'll show you someone, even Ronald Reagan wrote lovely notes who can write fairly well. Then the second, it sounds very passe, but getting a lot of practice. Now, keep in mind for 22 years, I stood up in front of
60, 100, 300 consumers and told a story for 80 minutes called A Class at NYU Stern, where they were paying me a lot of money to be very entertaining and insightful and educational for 80 minutes. See above, I charged my classes at one point, we're getting $170,000 in tuition per class.
And then consulting is essentially storytelling through writing, through PowerPoint. So what are we going to do? We're hopefully going to have some talent, but you can't control that. We're going to get comfortable writing. We're going to put ourselves in a position of speaking in front of others, which can be painful, but it's important to do that early. And then we're going to find a medium.
And I do this in my class. There's so many mediums now to be a storyteller. TikTok, Medium, writing long-form posts on Medium, Substack, texting as a form of communication, obviously writing books, writing articles, speaking. I mean, there's just so many putting out YouTube videos, whatever it might be. Your ability to tell a story on a different medium is
is, in my opinion, the key skill. So what are you going to do? You're going to start practicing. You're going to pick a medium. You're going to say, what would it mean to be on the top 1% of people on Instagram? That means I would need this many followers and this type of engagement. I do this in my class. I task everyone with picking a medium and saying, I'm going to be in the top 1% on LinkedIn by the time this class ends. And you figure out the nuance and the subtleties of storytelling in that medium.
Be clear. This is the gangster skill. Storytelling, storytelling never goes out of style. It is enduring. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehoursofproptimedia.com. Again, that's officehoursofproptimedia.com. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our associate producer and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening.
To the Prop G Pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network, we will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hahn. And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.
Canva presents a work love story like no other. Meet Productivity. She's all business. The Canva doc is done. Creativity is more of a free thinker. Whiteboard brainstorm. They're worlds apart, but sometimes opposites attract. Thanks to Canva.
The data is in the deck. And now it's an animated graph. Canva, where productivity meets creativity. Now showing on computer screens everywhere. Love your work at Canva.com. And we're back with Canva Presents Secret Sounds, Work Edition. Caller, guess this sound. Mouse click. So close. That's actually publishing a website with Canva Docs. Next caller.
Definitely a mouse click. Nice try. It was sorting 100 sticky notes with a Canva whiteboard. We also would have accepted resizing a Canva video into 10 different sizes. What? No way. Yes way. One click can go a long way. Love your work at Canva.com.