Trump's Triumph and the Legacy Media’s Blind Spots | 11.23.24
Morning Wire
Deep Dive
Why did the legacy media fail to predict Trump's landslide win in 2024?
The media underestimated Trump's support due to their narrow geographic and demographic focus, primarily on the coasts, and their lack of understanding or interest in the broader American electorate.
What significant changes did the media observe in Trump's support base between 2016 and 2024?
Trump's support expanded to include significant gains among Hispanic, Black, and Jewish voters in urban areas like New York City and Chicago, indicating a broader appeal than previously understood.
Why did the media label Trump as a fascist, and what does this reveal about their understanding of his support base?
The media used the 'fascist' label to vilify Trump, but this mischaracterization reveals their failure to grasp that his support includes diverse ethnic groups who see him as standing up for their interests.
How has the shift from advertising to subscription-based revenue affected media bias?
The shift to subscription models has made media outlets more attuned to the political views of their paying readers, incentivizing them to cater to specific ideological audiences, often leaning left.
What role does the market play in potentially moderating the political bias of legacy media outlets?
Market forces may drive legacy media to become more balanced as new digital platforms offer alternative, less biased news sources, compelling traditional outlets to appeal to a broader audience for business reasons.
- Media predicted a 90% chance of Hillary Clinton winning in 2016.
- Trump won again in 2024 with more votes and a higher share.
- Media's vilification of Trump continued without understanding his support base.
Shownotes Transcript