The Assad regime fell quickly due to the lack of strong support from Russia and Iran, both of which were weakened by their own conflicts (Ukraine for Russia and Israel for Iran). Additionally, the Turkish-backed rebels, particularly HTS, took advantage of this vulnerability and launched a swift offensive.
The fall of Assad has significant implications, including potential weakening of Russia and Iran's influence in the region, a possible resurgence of ISIS, and a new power dynamic involving Turkey and HTS. It also opens up opportunities for the West to negotiate with new players and potentially weaken Iran's presence.
Initially, many countries, including the U.S., were opposed to Assad. However, over time, there was a shift towards normalization and rapprochement, facilitated by countries like the UAE. The Biden administration even watered down sanctions, but recent events have forced a reevaluation of this approach.
Turkey enabled and protected groups like HTS, which played a crucial role in the offensive that led to Assad's fall. Turkey's strategic interests, including dealing with the Kurdish issue and managing refugee flows, drove their support for the rebels.
The fall of Assad could lead to a more complex but potentially more manageable situation for American interests. With 800-900 soldiers still in eastern Syria and allies like the Syrian Democratic Forces, the U.S. could have more influence and leverage in the region.
The fall of Assad highlights the limitations and vulnerabilities of both Russia and Iran. Russia's inability to prop up Assad despite significant investment and Iran's decimated Hezbollah forces show that their influence is not as robust as previously thought.
HTS faces challenges in governing a diverse and fractured Syria, including dealing with other rebel groups, managing local administrations, and maintaining international relations. Their ability to hold power will depend on their pragmatism and willingness to make deals with other players.
The flag's presence signifies a significant humiliation for Russia, which had heavily invested in propping up Assad. It also symbolizes the rapid and unexpected collapse of Assad's regime and the shifting power dynamics in the region.
The situation in Syria impacts the broader geopolitical landscape by altering the balance of power in the Middle East. It weakens Russia and Iran, challenges Turkey's policies, and opens up new opportunities and challenges for the West and regional actors.
There is a potential for a resurgence of ISIS, especially in ungoverned spaces and areas where the regime's control has weakened. However, the presence of U.S. forces and allies like the Syrian Democratic Forces could mitigate this threat.
Trump is threatening members of Congress with jail and Republican senators may be circling the wagons around his nominees, but we still need to protect ourselves from a nihilistic mindset. Plus, cautious optimism and uncertainty after the fall of Syria's brutal dictatorship. And no, Tulsi: You were wrong. Assad was our enemy.
Bill Kristol and Michael Weiss join Tim Miller. Show notes: Tim's Triad piece on fighting a nihilistic mindset )