People
A
Andrea Dunlop
一名专注于真实犯罪和社会问题的媒体人物和作者。
Topics
Andrea Dunlop: 本案中性别因素扮演着重要角色,96%的施暴者是女性,人们常认为"诱导性疾病"诊断带有性别歧视色彩,但作者认为这并非完全正确,女性的痛苦、经历和专业意见往往不被重视。虽然呼吁"相信女性"很重要,但本案中涉及多位女性,不能简单地选择相信谁,而应根据证据判断。Netflix纪录片将Sally Smith医生和Kathy Beatty描绘成反派,但她们已不在诉讼中,媒体报道对其生活和职业造成严重影响。儿童保护服务机构(CPS)拥有强大的权力,只需证明存在可能伤害儿童的理由即可将儿童与父母分开,但最终决定权在法院。对Kathy Beatty的指控包括其之前的被捕记录以及与Maya的两次互动,尽管指控被撤销,但这并不意味着她无罪,她的行为导致她被解雇。对Maya拍摄照片的解释:医院需要记录Maya离开医院时的身体状况,且当时孩子的监护权在州政府手中,而非父母。对Kathy Beatty与Maya身体接触的指控:原告方将这些行为定性为性侵犯,但被告方辩称这是为了安慰孩子。作者对Kathy Beatty与Maya的肢体接触事件感到矛盾:一方面,孩子需要关爱;另一方面,需要尊重孩子的意愿。社会工作者Kathy Beatty可能承担了超出其职责范围的责任,医院在执行禁止接触令方面有一定的自主权。禁止Maya接触宗教物品是医疗虐童调查中的标准流程,是为了孩子的安全。 Kathy Beatty: (缺乏直接观点陈述,主要通过纪录片和证词呈现) Sally Smith: (缺乏直接观点陈述,主要通过纪录片和证词呈现) Beata Kowalski: (缺乏直接观点陈述,主要通过纪录片和证词呈现) Jack Kowalski: (缺乏直接观点陈述,主要通过纪录片和证词呈现) Gregory Anderson: 对Sally Smith医生的强烈指控,认为她欺凌Kowalski一家,并试图破坏亲子关系。 Deborah Salisbury: 强调法院倾向于采信医院工作人员和医生的说法。

Deep Dive

Chapters

Shownotes Transcript

In the flattened version of the Maya Kowalski story that has dominated the headlines, Beata Kowalski is a mother who fell prey to age-old biases against women. This story attaches itself to the well-documented reality that women are all too often not believed when it comes to their own pain, the stories of their own lives, and their professional opinions. Beata is cast as the martyr in Netflix’s “Take Care of Maya” and two other women, Cathy Beady and Dr. Sally Smith, are cast as the villains. Today, we unpack the messy gender dynamics of this case.  

Cathy Beady is the social worker with a troubling past who’s been accused of grooming and assaulting Maya Kowalski. What do we know about what happened during Maya’s stay at Johns Hopkins All Childrens? Was Cathy Beady really hellbent on keeping Maya and Beata apart? 

Media coverage of the Maya Kowalski story has also done irreparable harm to the life and career of the respected doctor at the center of the controversy: child abuse pediatrician Sally Smith. She’s been accused of violating HIPPA in a single-minded crusade to create a case against Beata Kowalski. But is there evidence that Dr. Smith did anything other than her job? Did she drive Beata to death as the film suggests or is it possible her interventions saved Maya Kowalski’s life? 

As we break down the narratives and misinformation surrounding this case we get to the heart of the matter. The Kowalski legal team’s claims that Munchausen by proxy is based on “junk science” and that Beata Kowalski wasn’t guilty of medical child abuse because this form of abuse isn’t even real.  


To support the show, subscribe on Apple Podcast)s or go to Patreon.com/NobodyShouldBelieveMe) where you can listen to exclusive bonus content and access all episodes early and ad-free, including weekly recaps of the Kowalski trial.

Follow host Andrea Dunlop on Instagram for behind-the-scenes photos: @andreadunlop

Buy Andrea’s books here). 

For more information and resources on Munchausen by Proxy, please visit MunchausenSupport.com)  

Download the APSAC's practice guidelines here). 

*** 

Click here) to view our sponsors. Remember that using our codes helps advertisers know you’re listening and helps us keep making the show!  

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)