cover of episode "Are You Grateful to Be Alive?": More from ASU ft. George Janko

"Are You Grateful to Be Alive?": More from ASU ft. George Janko

2024/12/11
logo of podcast The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

People
C
Charlie Kirk
G
George Janko
M
Mila
一位听众
一位自称自由主义者的听众
Topics
Charlie Kirk:无论怀孕原因如何,堕胎都是错误的,因为胎儿也是人。堕胎在医学上永远不是拯救母亲生命的必要手段。基于唐氏综合症等原因进行堕胎是优生学,是不对的。将堕胎简单归结为“女人的选择”是将胎儿非人化,与纳粹德国的思想类似。在遭受强奸等恶性事件后,不应该以另一个恶性行为(堕胎)来回应。即使孩子在虐待环境中长大,也不应该堕胎。分娩是女性经历的积极和美好的事情。将堕胎的道德准则应用于其他生命领域是不合理的。 George Janko:无论怀孕的具体情况如何,堕胎都是不道德的,因为这等同于谋杀。人人生来善良,暴力无法解决问题,而应寻求智慧与民主。在遭受强奸等恶性事件后,不应该以另一个恶性行为(堕胎)来回应。个人选择和社会决策之间存在差异,在避孕问题上,个人观点与社会观点可能不同。人与动物的区别在于人能够说话,这体现了人的理性。人的灵魂是理性发展的产物,但人的存在不仅仅是理性。胎儿在子宫内的生长发育也是一种行动,具有道德保护的价值。堕胎并非拯救母亲生命的必要手段,分娩或剖腹产等其他医疗程序可以达到同样的目的。母亲有权决定是否堕胎,即使这会伤害到父亲。胎儿出生后才成为人,在此之前,其行为不构成人的标准。母亲有权决定胎儿的命运,因为胎儿在母亲体内。一岁大的婴儿不会杀死自己的母亲,而胎儿则可能危及母亲的生命。他并不感谢他的母亲没有堕胎,因为他并不快乐也不平静。 一位自称自由主义者的听众:善良、平和和快乐可以不依赖宗教信仰而存在。西方社会中的许多价值观源于基督教传统,但这些价值观可以独立于宗教而存在。自由和文明的社会需要一种文化,这种文化要么继承自,要么相信永恒的存在或超越的道德秩序。 Mila:基督教道德观不应该凌驾于其他宗教道德观之上。生命优先于质量,否则就是优生学。所有的人类生命,包括婴儿和冷冻胚胎,都是平等的。基于性别选择进行堕胎是错误的。在堕胎问题上,存在客观的道德准则,不能仅仅依靠个人或文化来决定。社会和文明需要客观的道德准则,不存在道德上的中立性。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why does the speaker argue that a child conceived in rape deserves moral protection?

The speaker argues that a child conceived in rape deserves moral protection because all human beings, regardless of their origin, are equal and should not be murdered. The speaker emphasizes that the circumstances of conception do not justify the termination of a human life.

Why does the speaker believe that abortion is never medically necessary to save a mother's life?

The speaker believes that abortion is never medically necessary to save a mother's life because there are other medical procedures, such as cesarean sections, that can save the mother's life without terminating the pregnancy.

Why does the speaker argue that a one-year-old child should receive moral protection but a fetus should not?

The speaker argues that a one-year-old child should receive moral protection because it can perform actions, such as crying, which the speaker considers a sign of moral worth. However, the speaker does not extend this reasoning to a fetus, which they believe does not have the same level of moral worth until it exits the womb.

Why does the speaker believe that life should be protected even in an abusive home?

The speaker believes that life should be protected even in an abusive home because they argue that the choice to end a life should not be based on the potential for a difficult or abusive environment. They contend that life itself is inherently valuable and worth protecting.

Why does the speaker argue that moral reasoning cannot be neutral in society?

The speaker argues that moral reasoning cannot be neutral in society because there must be an objective moral philosophy to govern actions such as murder and theft. They believe that allowing everyone to decide their own morality leads to a lack of consistency and can result in harmful practices.

Chapters
This chapter explores the morality of healthcare access, using the analogy of a curable disease to discuss abortion in cases of rape. The conversation highlights the ethical dilemma of weighing the rights of the mother against the life of the unborn child.
  • The discussion uses a hypothetical disease to compare it to pregnancy resulting from rape.
  • The question of whether a child conceived in rape deserves an abortion is raised.
  • The concept of medical necessity in saving the mother's life is debated.

Shownotes Transcript

Charlie had a remarkable conversation with a pro-abortion atheist at Arizona State University shortly before the election. Charlie and George Janko asked some compelling questions: Is he happy? Is he at peace? Is he grateful his mother didn't abort him? His answers have to be heard, along with other exciting questions from the students of ASU.

Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/support)

See omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.