The Smiley Face Killers: A Chilling Theory of Unsolved Tragedies
39:18 Share

This episode is sponsored by Acorns. Imagine a world where every purchase you make builds toward your financial future. With Acorns, that's exactly what happens, seamlessly and automatically. Acorns makes it easy to start automatically saving and investing for you, your kids, and your retirement. You don't need a lot of money or expertise to invest with Acorns.

In fact, you can get started with just your spare change. Acorns recommends an expert-built portfolio that fits you and your money goals, then automatically invests your money for you. And now, Acorns is putting their money into your future. Open an Acorns Later IRA and get up to a 3% match on new contributions.

That's extra money for your retirement. It's easy, stress-free, and truly one of the best financial moves you can make. Start small, dream big, and let Acorns guide you to a better financial future. Head to acorns.com slash crimehub or download the Acorns app to start saving and investing for your future today.

paid non-client endorsement. Compensation provides incentive to positively promote Acorns. Investing involves risk. Acorns Advisors LLC and SEC registered investment advisor. View important disclosures at acorns.com slash crime mob. Before we dive into today's episode, I want to share a powerful new true crime podcast titled Murder in the Orange Grove, The Troubled Case Against Crosley Green.

Imagine spending over 30 years behind bars for a crime you say you did not commit. That's the reality for Crosley Green. Back in 1989, he was convicted and sentenced to death by an all-white jury for the murder of Chip Flynn, even though there's compelling evidence that raises serious doubts about his guilt.

For 25 years, 48 Hours correspondent Erin Moriarty has followed Crosley's story, uncovering disturbing details of coerced confessions and allegations of a racial hoax that make us question everything about this verdict. In this podcast, you'll hear exclusive, never-before-heard interviews from those closest to the case, including Crosley himself.

Murder in the Orange Grove brings a fresh look at the evidence that could change the course of Crosley's life. Don't miss out. Tune in now to Murder in the Orange Grove, the troubled case against Crosley Green. Available wherever you get your podcasts. The smiley face killer's theory has sunk deep into the dark, unsettling annals of contemporary crime, festering into one of the most perplexing and disturbing mysteries of modern times.

It's a story that begins with the sudden, eerie disappearances of young, vibrant men. Most of them in the prime of their lives, bursting with energy. College students full of ambition and promise. These men, who slip away into the night after casual outings with friends, never to return. What should have been carefree evenings of laughter and camaraderie, instead unravel into tragedy.

as their bodies are later pulled from rivers, lakes or other bodies of water, pale, lifeless and cold after days or weeks beneath the murky surface. What initially seemed like a series of tragic, alcohol-induced accidents, chalked up to confusion and poor judgment in a drunken haze, has since warped into a chilling, complex web of suspicion suggesting something far more sinister lurking beneath.

The theory goes far beyond mere coincidence, proposing that these drownings are not isolated misfortunes, but are linked. The handiwork of an organized, shadowy network of killers roaming across the United States.

These predators are believed to leave behind a twisted calling card. A crude, mocking smiley face spray-painted near the water where the bodies surface, grinning up from walls like a taunt. A grotesque signature that sends chills through the spines of those who find it. It was three retired detectives, Kevin Gannon, Anthony Duarte, and Michael O'Neill, who first began to peel back the surface of this horrifying theory.

uneasy with the official reports. With decades of law enforcement experience between them, they'd seen countless tragic accidents, but these cases gnawed at them. Something wasn't right. The standard explanations of alcohol-induced drownings, the notion that these young men had simply stumbled too close to the water's edge in their drunken states, didn't sit well. As they dug deeper, the unsettling details began to unravel.

revealing a disturbing pattern that could no longer be ignored. Time and time again, they encountered the same grim elements: victims with eerily similar profiles, vanishing under eerily similar circumstances, and most unsettling of all, the haunting recurrence of the same mocking smiley face graffiti. The pattern was undeniable. These weren't random drownings, they suspected. It was something far darker.

A group of killers stalking young men, leaving behind their grinning symbol as a twisted signature. A dark and disturbing pattern, the late 1990s marked the beginning of this eerie trend. It started quietly at first, with scattered reports of young men, mostly college students, going missing after nights out at bars or parties.

These disappearances, often taking place in cities across the Midwest and Northeast, seemed random and unconnected at first. The victims, typically in their late teens or early twenties, were described by friends and family as happy, well-liked, and generally responsible. After a night of drinking and socializing, they would simply vanish. Their absence only discovered when they failed to return home.

As the days passed, families and friends grew frantic, and search efforts intensified. Then, inevitably, the tragic news would break. The body had been found, floating in a nearby river or lake, lifeless and pale, sometimes weeks after the initial disappearance. At first, these deaths were classified as accidental drownings, the result of too much booze and poor decisions near water.

It seemed logical, even if heartbreaking, and the cases were quickly closed. Over time, a disturbing pattern began to emerge, one that caught the attention of Kevin Gannon and his colleagues. These young men weren't simply stumbling into water. In many cases, the victims' bodies were found far downstream from where they had last been seen, in locations that seemed improbable for someone to have reached by accident.

Additionally, several of the bodies showed signs of minimal decomposition, even though they had supposedly been submerged in water for long periods, a discrepancy that troubled forensic experts. It was the repeated appearance of smiley face graffiti near the recovery sites that caused the most alarm.

These innocent-looking symbols, usually spray-painted on walls or under bridges, took on an ominous new meaning in the context of these deaths, hitting at the presence of something far more sinister than simple bad luck. One of the earliest cases that Gannon and his team investigated was the disappearance of Patrick McNeil, a 21-year-old Fordham University student.

In 1997, Patrick left a bar in Manhattan after a night out with friends. Seemingly headed home, but he never made it. His friends grew concerned when he didn't show up the next morning. And soon, a massive search effort was underway. For over a month, there was no trace of him. 35 days later, his body was discovered in the East River. On the surface, it seemed like a tragic accident.

Gannon couldn't accept the official ruling of accidental drowning. The details of Patrick's case troubled him deeply. His body showed minimal signs of decomposition, which was highly unusual given how long he had supposedly been in the water. Even more alarming, there were unexplained bruises on his wrists, suggesting he may have been restrained. And near the site where his body was found, a smiley face had been spray-painted on a wall.

To Gannon, this was no coincidence. Patrick's death was no accident. One particularly haunting case was that of Tommy Booth, a 24-year-old from Pennsylvania.

On a frigid January night in 2008, Booth was out celebrating a friend's birthday at a local bar nestled in the small town of Ridley Township. The atmosphere was charged with laughter and camaraderie, the clinking of glasses mingling with the pulsating rhythm of music. But as the evening wore on, the joviality faded, and Tommy, much like McNeil before him, became the last of his group to leave the bar.

When his body was discovered two weeks later, it was found in a creek just behind the bar, submerged in water that mirrored the chilling reality of his fate. Once again, the grim signature in these cases. A smiley face was found spray-painted near the site of his body. This unsettling symbol painted a picture of mockery and tragedy, leaving a chilling impression on those left behind. Tommy's mother was left shattered by the news of her son's death,

A vivid memory etched in her mind that she recounts with palpable anguish. The moment she learned of his fate, it felt like a cruel joke, as if the universe itself was taunting her family. The presence of the smiley face graffiti felt like a sinister twist, a dark element that deepened her heartbreak and bewilderment. Mary Booth became increasingly suspicious about the nature of her son's death.

After investigating and hearing about other similar cases, she began to believe that Tommy might be one of the victims of the alleged smiley face killers. In her quest for answers, she contacted a medium to seek closure and to understand what happened to her son. The medium claimed to have communicated with Tommy's spirit, suggesting that he did not drown accidentally, but was rather the victim of foul play.

Mary Booth's decision to reach out to a medium was fueled by her desire for clarity in a situation that felt shrouded in mystery. Her experience reflects the desperation of many families dealing with unexplained or suspicious deaths, particularly in cases where they feel like the official investigations may not fully address their concerns. The connection to the smiley face killers added a layer of intrigue and horror to Tommy's story.

resonating with those who fear that such patterns may exist in the deaths of young men across the country. In this climate of anxiety and uncertainty, families like Mary's found themselves searching for connections and answers. Each new finding became a lifeline, illuminating the dark corners of a tragedy that often felt incomprehensible.

These grieving families were drawn into a web of investigation, determined to unravel the disturbing patterns that emerged from the tragic loss of life. A commonly touted proof of this theory is that of the forensic reports. Forensic analysis of the bodies often revealed a disturbing pattern. The remains showed minimal decomposition, suggesting that these young men had not been submerged in water for the entirety of their absence.

Investigators Gannon and Duarte were led to suspect that these victims had endured a harrowing ordeal, possibly held captive elsewhere before being discarded like trash. The crime scenes offered further grim evidence, with many bodies displaying ligature marks and signs of struggle, a testament to the violence that marred their final moments.

Creating an exceptional retail experience can feel overwhelming. Managing multiple locations, keeping up with teams, handling fulfillment, and coordinating separate workflows. It's a lot.

But with Shopify's Point of Sale, you get a seamless, unified command center for your retail business. Imagine a system that brings together your in-store and online operations across up to a thousand locations. Shopify makes shopping convenient for your customers, whether they're buying online, picking up in-store, or shipping directly. And for your staff, they've got all the tools they need to close every sale. Customer loyalty is essential.

With Shopify POS, keep your customers coming back with personalized experiences and valuable first-party data for more effective marketing. It's a proven boost. Businesses on Shopify POS report a 22% better cost of ownership and an average of 8.9% increase in sales. Want more? Check it out at shopify.com slash crunched.

Each discovery unraveled another layer of a tragic mystery, where the vibrant lives of young men were extinguished, leaving behind only whispers at their once bright futures.

Building a case and gaining traction by the early 2000s, Gannon, Duarte, and O'Neill had compiled a growing number of cases that seemed to fit this chilling profile. The drownings, which had initially seemed like tragic but unrelated accidents, began to appear far more coordinated, with each case following an eerie script. The victims were almost always young, athletic, well-liked men in their early 20s, attending college or university.

They would go out for a night of fun, and somewhere along the way, they would vanish. Their bodies would later be found in rivers or lakes, often far from where they had last been seen. And time and again, there was the same unsettling detail: a smiley face, spray-painted nearby, almost as if taunting the authorities.

The detectives were beginning to believe that this wasn't the work of a lone killer, but rather an organized group that was systematically targeting these young men. One of the most high-profile cases to attract national attention was that of Chris Jenkins, a 21-year-old student at the University of Minnesota. Chris disappeared after attending a Halloween party in 2002, dressed in a Native American costume.

His friends had seen him leave the bar that night. After that, he was never seen alive again. Initially, his case was treated as a missing person investigation. The circumstances surrounding his disappearance began to raise alarm bells for investigators and his family. Jenkins was last seen leaving a bar in the trendy uptown neighborhood of Minneapolis, a vibrant area known for its nightlife.

he was reported missing shortly after, leading to extensive search efforts by family, friends, and law enforcement. As time passed without any sign of Jenkins, concerns grew, particularly given the troubling reports of other young men who had gone missing or been found dead in the area. In April 2003, nearly five months after his disappearance, Jenkins' body was discovered in the Mississippi River

a grim conclusion to a case that had captivated the community. The condition of his remains raised further questions. Forensic analysis suggested that he had been in the water for a relatively short period, contradicting the timeline of events. The discovery of his body sparked renewed interest in the case and led to a re-evaluation of the circumstances surrounding his death.

In 2006, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office ruled Jenkins' death a homicide, a significant shift in how the case was perceived. This reclassification was based on several key factors, including the forensic evidence that pointed to potential foul play.

The autopsy revealed signs of trauma that were inconsistent with accidental drowning, leading investigators to suspect that he may have been attacked before his body was disposed of in the river. Witness accounts and the pattern of other similar cases in the area further fueled the belief that Jenkins' death was part of a more sinister trend, suggesting that a serial killer may have been operating in the region.

After three months of investigating the Chris Jenkins case, Milwaukee Magazine uncovered that a gang known as the Dealers of Death is now claiming responsibility for some of these deaths. Jeremy Alford, the suspect in the Jenkins murder, informed the FBI that the gang was involved in the murders of 40 men. One alleged gang member, known by the nickname "Smiley," was specifically identified in connection with these crimes.

While the FBI acknowledged that Alford mentioned the gang during questioning, they maintain that there is no concrete evidence supporting the existence of the dealers of death. Milwaukee Magazine discovered documents from the New Brighton, Minnesota police that reveal two men, including Smiley, admitting their association with the gang.

"We look at these young men as being the best of the best as far as we're concerned," said Gannon. "They're the best athletes, and all of them are affluent. They come from the best families. Anthony said years ago that these killers could have been envious, jealous of these kids. They had something they didn't have. That's a possibility. But also, if you know anything about domestic terrorism, about these gangs in general, is that when you have nothing, you have nothing to lose."

That's where terrorism actually begins. Despite these findings, the theory faced considerable pushback from law enforcement agencies, including the FBI. Officials insisted that the majority of these deaths were drownings, pointing out that young men often make poor decisions while intoxicated. They maintained that the smiley face graffiti, while unsettling, was merely a coincidence.

After all, it's a common symbol that can be found in cities and towns across the country. For Gannon, Duarte, and O'Neill, the patterns were far too consistent to be brushed aside. They believed that the similarities in victim profiles, the repeated use of water as a disposal method, and the smiley faces painted near the recovery sites were clear indicators that these deaths were not accidental.

In a 2008 press release, the FBI addressed the ongoing investigations involving the deaths of young, college-aged men found in Midwest rivers. Over the past several years, law enforcement and the FBI have received information about young, college-aged men who were found deceased in rivers in the Midwest. The statement read:

The FBI confirmed they had reviewed the details provided by two retired detectives who labeled the cases as the "smiley face murders" and had also interviewed a person who gave information to the detectives. Their final report stated: To date,

The FBI also emphasized their ongoing collaboration with local police in the affected regions.

The decision to classify Jenkins' disappearance as a homicide not only brought attention to his case, but also highlighted the broader issue of safety for young men in urban environments. His family became advocates for greater awareness of the potential dangers facing young adults, particularly in nightlife settings. They also sought to keep Chris' story alive, pushing for a renewed investigation into his death and the circumstances that led to it.

The reclassification ultimately underscored the importance of thorough investigations in missing persons cases, especially when patterns of violence and unexplained disappearances begin to emerge within a community. Chris Jenkins' case remains a poignant reminder of the unresolved questions that continue to haunt families grappling with loss and the search for justice.

The emotional toll on families and investigators is significant, as families continue to seek answers. Meanwhile, several police departments involved in the investigations dispute the idea that these cases are connected. Authorities currently do not view the presence of smiley face graffiti near some of the scenes as evidence of serial killer activity.

For instance, the La Crosse, Wisconsin Police Department, which led eight investigations, determined that the deaths were accidental drownings involving intoxicated men and reported that no smiley face symbols were found in connection with any of these cases. Additionally, the Center for Homicide Research published a report aiming to scientifically refute the theory.

In March 2009, Lee Gilbertson, a criminal justice professor at St. Cloud State University, expressed his support for the theory during an appearance on Larry King Live, where the alleged murders were discussed. For the families of the victims, the emotional toll has been devastating. Many have struggled to accept the official explanations offered by authorities.

The idea that their sons, brothers and friends had simply wandered off in a drunken stupor and drowned seemed too simplistic, too dismissive. Instead, they have joined forces with Gannon and his team, convinced that their loved ones were the victims of something far more nefarious.

These families have lived with the agony of unanswered questions, constantly replaying the events leading up to the deaths in their minds, searching for clues that might explain what really happened. The emotional burden is immense, and for many, the search for truth feels endless.

The smiley face killers theory quickly garnered significant media attention, with numerous outlets covering the unsettling possibility of a network of killers targeting young men across the country. Channels like Oxygen and A&E aired true crime documentaries that delved into several of these cases, further stoking public curiosity, and even a 2020 slasher film.

Online communities soon emerged, where amateur investigators analyzed police reports, news stories, and autopsy findings in an effort to uncover the truth. As media interest grew, so did the pushback. Law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, were swift to reject the theory. Officials stated that their investigations had found no evidence of foul play and maintained that the deaths were unrelated.

Local police departments in cities where the drownings occurred echoed these conclusions, leading to a widening rift between official law enforcement and the independent detectives who continued to champion the theory. In 2008, Duarte explained to CNN that he believes the smiley faces serve as a taunting message directed at the police.

Gannon, similarly, suggested the symbols might indicate the killers are mocking law enforcement, stating they could signify that the perpetrators are laughing at authorities. They're happy they're getting away with this, and they're getting a little more brazen, Gannon told the New York Daily News. Despite the skepticism, the detectives behind the smiley face killer's investigation pressed on.

Many of them worked independently, motivated by their belief that these young men had been deliberately targeted. They argued that the families of the victims deserved answers and that the evidence pointed to something far more sinister than accidental drownings. While some commended the detectives for their dedication, others criticized them for creating unnecessary fear.

The theory became a source of intense debate, with supporters viewing it as a legitimate investigation and detractors dismissing it as overly speculative. The detectives themselves have not been immune to the emotional strain. Gannon, Duarte, and O'Neill have dedicated years of their lives to investigating these cases, poring over autopsy reports, reviewing case files, and comforting grieving families.

The work has been grueling, both physically and emotionally. Each new case brings with it a fresh wave of heartbreak, as another family is left to pick up the pieces of a life cut short. Yet, despite the toll it has taken, the detectives remain steadfast in their pursuit of the truth.

They believe that many of these cases were hastily classified as accidents without thorough forensic investigations, and they are determined to expose what they see as a pattern of negligence and oversight. The smiley face killers theory, which gave rise to the term "smiley face killers," proposes the existence of an organized group of killers responsible for the mysterious drownings of young men across the US.

Retired NYPD detectives Kevin Gannon, Anthony Duarte, and Michael O'Neill are the key proponents of this idea. They argue that these deaths, officially ruled as accidental drownings, are actually the work of a shadowy network targeting young, athletic, and academically successful men. According to this theory, these men typically disappear after nights out drinking, and their bodies are later found in nearby bodies of water.

Gannon and his team suggest that the drowning deaths are staged to look accidental. Except, the killers are deliberate and methodical. A chilling aspect of this theory is the recurring presence of smiley face graffiti near the recovery sites, which the detectives interpret as the killer's signature, taunting authorities.

Additionally, the theory posits that these murders are not the work of a lone individual, but rather a group of people who may be coordinating across states, possibly through online channels to carry out the killings. The FBI overwhelmingly dismisses the smiley face killers theory, attributing the drownings to tragic, accidental causes.

According to their analysis, most of the young men who died were heavily intoxicated, making them prone to poor decision-making and accidents. They suggest that after nights of drinking, these young men, impaired by too many beers, wandered too close to rivers, lakes or docks, and tragically drowned. Environmental factors also play a key role in this theory.

Law enforcement points to hazards like slippery walkways, poorly lit areas, and cold weather, all of which could make it easier for intoxicated individuals to fall into water and succumb to drowning. As for the smiley face graffiti found near some of the death scenes, officials contend that it is coincidental. They argue that smiley faces are a common form of street art in urban settings and are not connected to the deaths in any meaningful way.

A third leading theory suggests that the pattern of deaths could be the work of a serial killer or multiple unconnected serial killers, rather than an organized group. Proponents of this theory note that the victims share similar profiles: young, attractive, successful men. But they argue that the consistency in method points to a single perpetrator or a few killers working independently.

According to this hypothesis, the killer or killers target intoxicated men who are alone and vulnerable, possibly by pushing them into water. The theory suggests that water serves as both a convenient method of disposing of the bodies and a way to obscure evidence of foul play.

While this theory doesn't support the idea of a coordinated network like the smiley face killers theory, it does acknowledge that the pattern of deaths is too strange to be purely coincidental. The presence of smiley face graffiti, in this case, may simply be a mark left by a lone killer, not an organized group. A more speculative theory posits that the deaths could be part of gang initiations or cult-related rituals.

Those who subscribe to this theory believe that the killings follow a ritualistic pattern, with the smiley face graffiti serving as a symbol or calling card of the group responsible. In this scenario, the drownings are not random accidents, but are carried out as part of a larger, hidden agenda. Supporters of this theory often point to the strange similarities between the cases.

Young men disappearing after nights of drinking and being found in water with smiley face graffiti nearby as evidence of ritualistic behavior. They argue that these similarities could indicate that the killings are carried out by a group that requires members to prove their loyalty through violent acts. While this theory is highly speculative and lacks strong evidence, it continues to circulate among those who believe that the smiley face symbol is more than a coincidence.

Some experts argue that the deaths are best explained through psychological and sociological factors, rather than criminal conspiracies. This theory focuses on the idea of accident clusters, where several tragic incidents of a similar nature occur in a short period, giving rise to the perception of a deeper, more sinister cause.

From a psychological perspective, humans are naturally predisposed to find patterns, even when none exist. The similarities in the victims' profiles and the presence of smiley face graffiti could be examples of confirmation bias. People focus on the details that fit the theory while ignoring those that do not.

This theory suggests that while the deaths are tragic, they may not be connected beyond the fact that they involve intoxicated young men in dangerous environments. The recurring smiley face graffiti could be entirely coincidental, as this symbol is commonly found in public places. Another theory that has gained traction in the digital age is the idea that the murders are being organized through the dark web.

where shadowy communities may be coordinating or even broadcasting these crimes. In this scenario, the killings are part of a larger, underground network of individuals who communicate through encrypted channels on the dark web, planning murders that appear accidental. Proponents of this theory suggest that the killers may share information, tips, or even live footage of the crimes on hidden forums.

The dark web provides anonymity, making it difficult for law enforcement to track down these individuals. While there is little concrete evidence to support the direct involvement of the dark web, the idea remains popular in certain online forums. Some theorists even speculate that the smiley face graffiti could be a form of communication between members of this hidden network.

Another theory proposes that some of the victims were drugged or targeted for other crimes, such as human trafficking or robbery, which went tragically wrong. In this scenario, the young men may have been drugged at bars or parties, incapacitated, and then abducted for sinister purposes. When the criminals' plans went awry, the bodies were disposed of in water to hide any evidence of the crime.

The use of date rape drugs like GHB has been suggested as a possible factor in some cases, with the idea that the victims were drugged and rendered helpless. This would explain why many of the men were found in water with few signs of struggle. This theory also encompasses the possibility that the victims were targeted for robbery, with the intention of leaving them unconscious and vulnerable, only for the situation to escalate into something more deadly.

The mystery of the Smiley Face Killers remains as enigmatic and controversial as ever. The media has played a significant role in keeping the theory alive, with documentaries, podcasts, and online forums devoted to dissecting every aspect of the cases. True crime enthusiasts have latched onto the theory, drawn in by its chilling implications and the idea that a secret network of killers might be operating undetected across the country.

The theory has also faced intense skepticism from both the public and law enforcement officials. Critics argue that the smiley face graffiti is too common to be meaningful and that many of the deaths can be explained by the victims' own actions while intoxicated. To them, the theory seems more like a conspiracy than a legitimate explanation for the deaths. Yet, despite the skepticism, the theory refuses to die.

Gannon, Duarte, and O'Neill continue their investigation. Undeterred by the critics and the doubters, they believe that their work has already made an impact by raising awareness about the need for more thorough investigations in cases of accidental drownings. Even if the smiley face killers are never conclusively identified, the detectives are proud of the work they have done to shine a light on these overlooked tragedies.

They argue that law enforcement needs to take a closer look at these cases, not just as isolated incidents, but as part of a larger, more disturbing pattern. The ongoing fascination with the Smiley Face killers reflects a deep-seated human need to understand the unexplainable. There is something inherently unsettling about the idea that young, healthy men can simply vanish, only to be found dead in the water days later.

The smiley face graffiti, with its darkly ironic symbolism, only adds to the sense of dread. As new cases continue to emerge, the detectives remain hopeful that they will one day uncover the evidence needed to definitively prove their theory. Until then, the smiley face killers remain an enduring enigma, a haunting mystery that continues to grip the public's imagination and fuel speculation.

The chilling trend of bodies turning up in bodies of water raises questions that refuse to fade, leaving families and communities grappling with unanswered questions and unresolved fears. As we've seen, the intersection of grief and curiosity drives people to dig deeper, hoping to shine a light on what some feel are overlooked or dismissed cases.

Each new discovery reignites the conversation around the smiley face killers and the troubling reality that these patterns persist. The search for answers is far from over, and as long as there are unanswered questions, the conversation will continue to grow.