A New Era In Washington
34:50 Share

I'm Martha McCallum. I'm Bill Hemmer. I'm Shannon Bream, and this is the Fox News Rundown. Tuesday, November 12, 2024. I'm Mike Emanuel.

Tomorrow, by secret ballot, Republican senators will select their next leader, with Mitch McConnell stepping aside from leadership in the new year.

His top lieutenant argues he's ready to achieve legislative victories for President-elect Trump and the American people. We just got to get the work done. And I'll bring a very collaborative, obviously, working style to do that. I think I've proven the job I have now, which is gathering the votes, that we've got what it takes to get that job done. We're joined by South Dakota Senator John Thune.

I'm Jessica Rosenthal. How will President Trump handle Iran the second time around? He offered some insights on the campaign trail, and now there are reports that some Iranian officials want to make a deal. President Trump has made it clear that he'd like to see these wars in Europe and the Middle East start to come to a peaceful resolution. I think the difference is that you only get...

Peace through strength, right? Like you don't get those peace deals without having tough policies first. And I'm David Marcus. I've got the final word on the Fox News Rundown. Republican senators must determine tomorrow who will lead them when the GOP becomes the majority party in January. The contenders, John Thune of South Dakota, John Cornyn of Texas, and Rick Scott of Florida.

Caroline Leavitt, a Trump spokeswoman, said this on Sunday Morning Futures. It certainly is great news that we have a Republican majority in the Senate who will help President Trump deliver on his legislative priorities. Senator-elect for Pennsylvania Dave McCormick also commented on the race during an appearance.

on Sunday Morning Futures. Well, I'm not going to talk about the pros and cons of the different candidates here, but what I would say is I think the mandate's clear. They've all said that they'll be, you know, in step with President Trump, and we have to be because we need this change. We can't be incremental. A number of Trump allies on social media are backing Rick Scott for the position, who I interviewed for yesterday's Fox News Rundown. I believe that

And I think President Trump believes we need to create an opportunity for every kid to live the dream. I think now what we've got to do is we've got to help do everything we can to help Donald Trump get his mandate accomplished through both the House and the Senate.

That's why I'm running to be the Republican leader, which will be the majority leader, because, you know, we have got to get something done here. But he's not the only one who recognizes President-elect Trump has a mandate and the United States Senate must advance his agenda. Well, I think the key is just, you know, have experience and background to get things done. South Dakota Senator...

John Thune. I think that we got a mandate from the American people. President Trump brought to the Republican Party's message of opportunity and freedom to a much broader coalition, and I think he's uniquely positioned to make that broad and deep appeal, but he's going to need allies and partners in the United States Congress. And in the Senate, we've got a majority now. So we've got to work with him to get his team in place quickly. And obviously, I bring to the table, I think, a leadership style that's conducive to getting results.

We've worked hard. I've had the whip job there, so I count the votes, have the relationships with our fellow colleagues in the United States Senate, and are working closely with the president and his team as we start to get together and shape an agenda that will, I think, respond to the message that was sent by the voters in this election.

And that is they want a change from the failed Biden-Harris-Schumer agenda. And we intend to deliver that. The Republicans gained ground in 48 states, nearly every demographic group compared to the 2020 election. And President Trump's on track to win 312 electoral votes, which would be the largest Republican electoral margin since 1988. So the American people have given President Trump and the Republican Congress a mandate to clean up

the Biden-Harris administration's mess and to unleash America's potential. And I think I'm well positioned to be able to do that and look forward to the opportunity if my colleagues find a way to support me when it comes to the election on Wednesday.

Confirming the president's cabinet will be a big part of the Senate's business in January. How would you prioritize processing those critical nominations as leader? We have to get that done first and foremost. The president's team, we've got to get them in place so they can hit the ground running. So that's going to be job number one. And when they get us appointees, it's getting the confirmation hearings set up quickly.

get them on the floor and start grinding them out. And if it means staying in through recesses and weekends to get that done, we're going to do it. We're going to do whatever it takes to get the president's nominees across the finish line, get them in place so they can begin to implement his agenda. And that's obviously job one, priority number one, and it's part of our constitutional responsibility in the United States Senate

But we're going to obviously prioritize that and make sure that as soon as we can, we're getting those nominees up on the floor and voting for them. You raised a tremendous amount of money this cycle, which is obviously a critical part of ultimately becoming the majority leader. Raising money is a big part of the gig. You also headline more than 200 events this cycle for candidates and for the NRSC.

How does that make you positioned in terms of potentially getting a promotion to majority leader? Well, you know, part of that, part of the job of a majority leader is to make sure you're doing everything to help the team and to protect the majority. And a lot of that comes down to raising money. These campaigns have gotten incredibly expensive. But I think we demonstrated this election, as you pointed out, the work ethic to get out there and do the work, over 200 events,

We raised on the order of $55 million for our candidates, and so we're prepared to do that. It is a necessary part of politics. Both sides now, these races have become incredibly expensive, which means that you've got to be willing to go out there and do what's necessary to raise the resources to make sure that your candidates have what they need to get their message out to the voters.

And we did that this time, which is why we now have 53 seats in the Senate instead of 49. It was a good Tuesday night. There were a few others I hope we would have gotten across the finish line, but we're well positioned now in the Senate at least to make sure that President Trump can achieve his agenda, and we intend to be good partners with him in doing that.

You mentioned you were a top lieutenant to majority leader or then minority leader Mitch McConnell as the Senate GOP whip. I'm curious how you would be different than McConnell if you are the majority leader.

Well, look, everyone has their own style. Leader McConnell has his own particular style. He's been able to achieve a lot with it. I have a different style. I really want to open the Senate up and let our talent shine. We've got some incredibly gifted and talented people. Politics has always been a team sport to me, and I want to get back to that. It doesn't mean that we're always going to agree, but it means working together to enact politics.

president ross agenda as it relates to legislating on the floor and the floor uh... i want to see power uh... senators be able to advance our legislative priorities i want to power the committee's put them to work we should be dedicating a significant amount for time to the corporations process and have robust opportunities for amendments there

If we can do those things, get the Senate up and functioning again and work together as a team, I'm confident that we can deliver on the mandate that the voters have given to President Trump and to our Senate majority. We just got to get the work done. And I'll bring a very collaborative, obviously, working style to do that. I think I've proven the job I have now, which is gathering the votes, that we've got what it takes to get that job done.

Speaking of teamwork, you guys do have a majority going into a new Congress, but getting that agenda across the finish line will require Republicans to stick together. Are you confident that Senators Scott, Cornyn, and you will all be able to work together well, regardless of how this election plays out?

Well, you know, in the end, like I said, this is a team sport. We've got to work together as a team. And, you know, obviously in a majority, even when you have 53 seats in the United States Senate, you've got to be able to make sure everybody's pulling in the same direction. So however this all comes out this week, we'll be doing our best, again, to make sure it's really all about –

changing the direction of this country, reversing the failed policies of the Biden-Harris-Schumer agenda, and doing the things that the American people in this election asked us to do. And so I feel very confident that, you know, however this comes out, everybody will pull together and work for the good of the country, because honestly, that really is what it's all about.

President-elect Trump has laid out a laundry list of policies he'd like to get done through Congress during his presidency, including fixing the immigration system, tax cuts, tax reform, cutting regulations on businesses. How confident with this new majority are you that you could get these things passed and passed reasonably quickly?

Well, I think that you're right. The American people have placed their confidence in us to secure the border, to get rid of this open border policy of the current administration, strengthen our fiscal future, and to protect the American people from devastating tax increases, which if we don't act, they're going to see a $4 trillion tax increase come January 1, 2026. And then, of course, to provide for our national security and our energy security in what is an increasingly...

violent and volatile world. That's what the American people have asked us to do. That's why they've placed their confidence in us. And I believe we can work as a team to achieve that. You know, I think everybody in the end

They're going to come to their own conclusions in the individual decisions for the leadership race, but at the end of the day, we have to be on the same team to enact President Trump's agenda. And it's an aggressive one because there's a lot of things to fix. And this administration has – the current administration has left us with a lot of work to do.

But I look forward to that work. I think we've got a great opportunity to get the country back on track, to put policies in place that will grow our economy and expand our economy, create those better-paying jobs, make America energy-dominant.

have tax and regulatory policies that encourage and incentivize investment in this country. And then, of course, as always, making sure that we're appropriately funding our military so that we address America's important security interests in what is an increasingly dangerous world. And that starts, again, with the southern border. There are so many threats that our country faces today. We need to take them all on. But the

the border security is going to be an important issue for the president, obviously, and for the Congress. I know you've met with the president-elect. I know you've been on the phone with him. I'm curious what your relationship with President-elect Trump is like these days.

We have a good relationship. We speak regularly. He obviously has a ton of influence with the Republican Party. And, you know, we're going to work hard to make sure that we're doing the right things together, being good partners to enact this agenda, which the American people have spoken loudly and clearly on. And I look forward to working with him to achieve as much as possible and to ensure, as I said at the outset, that he has the right people in place to enact that agenda.

President-elect Trump has signaled he'd like to shift a bit in terms of foreign policy when it relates to Russia's war in Ukraine and the conflict in Gaza. What role do you think the Senate would play in that foreign policy shift? And do you think Senate Republicans are on board with him on that front?

I think we are very anxious to get a resolution in both those places. And I think one of the failures of the current administration is by projecting weakness. And that's true in the Middle East with regard to Israel and our greatest ally there. It's true with regard to Russia, Ukraine, Indo-Pacific. You look at all these hot spots around the world, and I always say that it's not our strength that tempts our adversaries, it's our weakness.

and this administration's projected weakness. You won't get that out of President Trump and his administration. There's going to be a new sheriff in town, and I think these people

The places of conflict around the world are going to be viewed very differently to a Trump administration. And again, we will be good partners in the Congress, work with him to ensure that America's national security interests are addressed and that we're keeping our country strong at a time of great tumult around the world. Senator John Thune of the great state of South Dakota.

We will follow the leadership election this week. Grateful for your time today, sir. All the best. Always good to be with you. Thanks, Mike.

This episode is brought to you by GlobalX. Since 2008, GlobalX ETFs has been committed to empowering investors with unexplored intelligence solutions. GlobalX specializes in exchange-traded funds that offer exposure to the artificial intelligence ecosystem, including themes like data centers, robotics, semiconductors, and cloud computing. To learn more about GlobalX's entire suite of ETFs, from covered calls, fixed income, emerging markets, and more, visit globalxetfs.com.

I'm Dana Perino, and this is Perino on Politics. Don Stu Stewart joins me to discuss the historic outcome of the 2024 presidential election, available now on FoxNewsPodcast.com or wherever you get your favorite podcasts. This is David Marcus with your Fox News commentary coming up. Last week, the Justice Department unveiled charges against a 51-year-old man who told American officials that he had been tasked with trying to kill President Trump ahead of this year's election.

Farhad Shaqiri, an Afghan national living in Iran, says he was told to assassinate other U.S. and Israeli targets on American soil, but says on October 7th he was told to focus in on Trump.

Two U.S. citizen co-conspirators were charged as well. Fox News Justice Department correspondent David Spunn. Trump, as we've been reporting for months, has been on the radar of Iran's radical government since he ordered the killing of Iranian National Guard leader Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. Officials see these plots and there have been several as a chance for revenge. We learned of the more fulsome threat against the president after the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt.

Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe was questioned at a congressional hearing by South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham about whether they'd ramped up security due to the Iranian threat against Trump. I cannot publicly comment, sir. Well, they publicly comment on it. I mean, it's not what I'm trying to say is I cannot publicly comment on what intelligence, but I can assure you that we do a threat based response.

protective model. In late September, our intelligence communities gave the Trump campaign a full briefing on the Iranian threat against him. He told supporters at a rally what he thought President Biden's reaction should be. I would inform the threatening country, in this case Iran, that if you do anything to harm this person, we are going to blow your largest cities and the country itself to smithereens. We're going to blow it to smithereens. You can't do that.

In his first administration, then-President Trump ended U.S. involvement in the JCPOA, the so-called Iran deal, and he reminded supporters on the campaign trail of that, as well as his use of sanctions against Iran. However, in early September at the Economic Club of New York, he indicated he had some other thoughts. The problem...

with what we have with sanctions and I was a user of sanctions but I put them on and take them off as quickly as possible because ultimately it kills your dollar and it kills everything the dollar represents and we have to continue to have that be the world currency. I think it's important. I think we'd be losing a war.

Now, the threat against his life, though, may impact policy toward Iran moving forward. The Iranian threat against President Donald Trump and his former deputies and even some Biden administration officials is not a new threat. It's actually been going on since the end of the Trump administration.

Morgan Ortegas is the founder of Polaris National Security and a former State Department spokesperson under President Trump. Because the Iranian threat was so bad, the Biden team had to authorize security for several former high ranking officials who worked on Iran. The secretary of state, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs. President Trump would have received security anyway, but that was intensified because of this threat.

I've actually been talking about this for at least three and a half years saying, listen, everybody, this is abnormal that Iran thinks it can get away with trying to assassinate on U S soil, former president Trump and some of his top deputies. And in fact, the Biden and Harris administration downplayed that threat because they wanted to get back into a nuclear deal, uh,

with the Islamic Republic of Iran. I thought it was incredibly unseemly. And I could not imagine. I mean, I was just flabbergasted at the time. I could not imagine that we would be willing to do a deal with a regime that was trying to kill the former president and officials on U.S. soil. I just have to footstomp how unusual that has been. Yeah, it certainly seems it.

As far as, I guess, moving forward with a Trump 2.0 and Iranian policy 2.0,

We heard, like, for example, from Elliott Abrams, he was the first Trump administration special representative for Iran. He said in a recent webinar that he thinks we'll see a more muscular policy toward Iran. And I'm quoting here, he said, we might see a much tougher attitude toward the Iranians and the view that actually stability and the avoidance of confrontation is not the highest goal. Do you think that might be true? And what do you think, if that is true, what might that look like?

Well, listen, President Trump made it very clear in his first term that Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon on his watch. He was unequivocal about that. I hope that is still his policy. You can see in the early appointments that he's made, for example, the least Stefan, a congresswoman from New York. She has been very pro-Israel. She's been very tough on Iran. And so if that trend continues, he will continue to have that.

Now, listen, he's not by any means he's never looked for regime change in Iran. He's never looked to put U.S. boots on the ground. But he did have the maximum economic pressure campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran during his first term. And what I think is going to be intolerable for this administration is to have happen what went on for the past decade.

four years, but specifically in this past year. We've seen our U.S. Navy ships in the Red Sea, in the Persian Gulf, in that theater, but specifically in the Red Sea because of the Houthis. We have seen them taking more action than any other time for the U.S. Navy since World War II. That means the Houthis, Iranian's proxies,

We're shooting ballistic missiles and sophisticated drones at U.S. Navy ships, at diplomatic facilities, at military facilities. We saw an Iranian-made drone kill three U.S. service members, kill three U.S. members in January in Jordan. And I just don't think harassing the United States military is going to be tolerated under former President Trump. When we think about what the reaction might be, I imagine that reaction to that could be

But to your earlier point about sanctions, it sounds like you're anticipating renewed sanctions, tougher sanctions, but also like, for example, the Wall Street Journal wrote that people briefed on Trump's plans said the new team is going to aim to choke off Iran's oil income, including going after foreign ports and traders who handle Iranian oil. Do you imagine these are two prongs of, I guess, a more financial strategy against Iran? Yeah.

Yeah, we'll see. I mean, the thing is, when you talk about new sanctions, we don't necessarily, you know, we can look at the strategy and what it needs to be. The problem has not been that the Biden administration needed new sanctions on Iran. The problem is that the Biden team did not enforce the Trump sanctions against Iran. See, we effectively took Iranian oil off the market in the Trump administration by enforcing those sanctions. Those sanctions were

are still on the books, but it's not that the sanctions ever left. The Trump sanctions are there. They just weren't enforced.

When you hear, like there's some reports now of members of the new Iranian government saying that they might want to make a deal with a new Trump administration, that they think that Trump likes making deals. What is your reaction to hearing that? Is it a little bit too late for Iran to start trying to make a deal or is Trump going to sort of maybe always be open to something as long as it's good enough for the United States?

Yeah. You know, listen, I think in the Trump administration, we were always very careful to say that we were open to a negotiation with Iran, that we wanted to extend the hand of diplomacy to them. And we tried. Right. Yes, they had crushing financial sanctions. But the purpose of that was to bring them back to the table for them to negotiate a much better deal than the JCPOA.

But the Iranians chose not to come to the table. If they're choosing to come to the table now, that's going to be up to former President Trump and soon to be 47th President Donald Trump. It's totally up to him. But but my guess would be is that we're not going to turn down a negotiation, but it's going to be a much, much tougher negotiation than what they would have gotten out of the Biden team.

Yeah. I also imagine, Morgan, that anything that is negotiated between the United States and Iran, Israel might want to have a say or might want to weigh in. I guess Netanyahu has said that he's been speaking frequently to President-elect Trump. I'm reading this quote. They had a very good and very important conversations aimed at strengthening the solid alliance between Israel and the U.S. He said that he and Trump see eye to eye.

to eye on the Iranian threat in all of its aspects and the danger it poses. But he also said we see the great opportunities before Israel in peace and expansion. I know that's a lot. That kind of encompasses a lot, even though it's not that many words. But what do you think that might mean when it comes to Israel, sort of their demands and their asks? I certainly do not see former President Trump trying to tie Israel's hands behind its back

as was done by Biden and Harris. However, I would say that President Trump has made it clear that he'd like to see these wars in Europe and the Middle East start to come to a peaceful resolution. And I think everybody wants that. The difference is that you only get peace through strength, right? Like, you don't get those...

You don't get those peace deals without having tough policies first. So, you know, there's there's no need, obviously, for anybody to seek a conflict that I don't think that's there. But instead, you take a really tough position and you say, listen, we're going to defend every last American. You can't touch Americans.

President Trump said clearly in the first term that he was not going to allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And I hope that's still his policy in the second term. I have every indication to think it will be. Remember that

You know, under President Reagan, for example, under eight years of President Reagan, not only were there not new wars, we saw peace through strength. We saw the collapse of the Soviet Union. And he did that really without firing a bullet. So there is a way to thread the needle here. When the former president campaigned, he went to Dearborn, Michigan. He told Muslim supporters or at least people who were interested in Trump's message that

that he told me he wants to see an end to the conflict in Gaza and also in Lebanon. When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the congressman from New York, posted, she asked people, she

Why did you vote for me and Trump if you did in my district? A couple of the responses she got were Trump reached out to Muslims. One answer simply read Gaza. What do you think that reach out to the Muslim community might mean for policy? Or were they just saying, hey, he he sounds like he wants to end this. Like, let's be open to that.

Yeah. So one of the things that I did is that I went to Detroit with Greg Grinnell, who spent a ton of time in Michigan, really heavily invested in there. And I think people felt like that the war wouldn't have gone on as long as it did under Trump, because he he you know, you've got to remember things like Rafa, for example, the Biden administration held Netanyahu from going back into Rafa by like six weeks.

And that's ultimately where we found, um, uh, hostages. Of course. Yeah. As well. But as I said, we remember there was a, there was a handful of hostages that they found there before they found some are. So, you know, you think about what did that six week delay cause? And every time there was a negotiation with the administration, uh,

uh, over, uh, you know, over what Israel had to do. It was a delay. Uh, when Iran, for example, attacked Israel the first time in April with ballistic missiles, a truly unprecedented attack, uh,

Biden's response to Netanyahu was take any right, like take the win basically. And so what happened? It just saw a few months later, more ballistic missiles from Iran. So I would argue that President Trump is credible whenever he says to the communities in Michigan, like, hey, we can end this war quicker than Biden and Harris could have because we wouldn't put all the delays on Netanyahu.

that the Biden-Harris team's in. But also remember that for a lot of the Lebanese and Iraqi community members there, one of the reasons that they're even in the United States is because they have seen the destabilizing effect of the Islamic Republic of Iran. I know when I was there, I was railing against the Biden and Harris administration's policy towards Iran, and that Arab community loved it. They were in full agreement because they have all suffered personally from the Iranian regime.

Wow. Great anecdotes. We'll leave it there. Morgan Ortegas, thank you so much for joining us. Thanks for having me.

in the stabbing of Mary Schlaes, whose body was found at a Springbrook intersection in February of 1974. The 25-year-old had been hitchhiking to a Chicago art show when she turned up dead that cold morning, and investigators were left with few leads beyond one piece of possible evidence, a stocking cap found near her body. Fifty years later, the hairs on the cap matched with Miller. Police interviewed him, and when presented with the DNA evidence, he fessed up.

According to the criminal complaint, he says he picked Schlaes up and after driving off, he started asking her for sexual contact. But when she refused, he pulled out a knife and began stabbing her in the back, slashing away as she tried to defend herself. There's more on this story at FoxNews.com. Subscribe to the Fox True Crime Podcast with Emily Campagno. I'm Gianna Gelosi with your Fox True Crime Minute.

This episode is brought to you by Amazon. The holidays are here, and you know what that means? It's time to get your friends and family the gifts they deserve. Take the stress out of shopping with Amazon's great deals and low prices on a huge range of items from toys to tech and much more. Whoever you're gifting for, Amazon has great prices on everything you need this holiday season. Shop Black Friday week starting November 21st.

It's time to take the quiz. Five questions, five minutes a day, five days a week. Take the quiz every weekday at thequiz.fox and then listen to the quiz podcast to find out how you did. Play, share, and of course, listen to the quiz at thequiz.fox. Subscribe to this podcast at foxnewspodcasts.com.

It's time for your Fox News commentary. David Marcus. What's on your mind? In the aftermath of President-elect Donald Trump's overwhelming victory, both the left and the right have a strong interest in believing or at least claiming that new media such as social media platform X and Joe Rogan's podcast was the secret to Trump's success. The problem is that from what voters told me over the last three months, it just isn't true.

First, let's look at why both sides are motivated to believe that these alternative media sources were decisive. After all, wrong though they may be, it is a rare thing that Democrats and Republicans seem to agree on.

For the Harris camp and its media allies, blaming Elon Musk's X-platform or the universe of edgy, allegedly right-wing podcasts for flooding the zone with disinformation is a perfect excuse for how spectacularly incorrect they were about this election. Instead of acknowledging that their incessant yammering about threats to democracy and Trump being a felon landed on voters' deaf ears because those voters were worried about the economy and the border, the MSNBCs of the world want Elon Musk to be the problem.

Likewise, on the right, we hear claims that legacy media is dead, that this is the age of citizen journalists and that this sea change portends long lasting power for the populist GOP of Donald Trump. To both sides, I would say not so fast.

It was the American people who decided this election, not podcasts, not ex-posts, and not influencer campaigns. It came down to two basic things. 70% of voters think the country is on the wrong track, and Kamala Harris was a horrible candidate.

I spent $100 on two bags of groceries, Carol in her 70s told me in Bedford, PA back in early October. That very day she was mailing in her normally non-voting husband's registration. Among the hundreds of voters I spoke to, it was by far the top issue. And in places like Bedford, they don't need the old media or the new media to tell them what they can plainly see on their grocery bills.

As to Harris's laughable lack of political chops, it was like the soundtrack of my travels through the election. I do wish she'd do more interviews, one Democrat, a photographer in his 60s, told me in August in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Fast forward to late October and in Scranton, PA, I had a paid Harris canvasser say to me, I don't know why she can't answer any questions.

Who or what gets credit or blame for an election result only matters insofar as it offers lessons going forward. And it is fairly obvious that the left blaming Elon Musk and new media is the wrong lesson to draw. But as easy as it is for the losing side to learn the wrong lessons, it is far easier and more consequential for the winning side to do so. Victory, they say, has a thousand fathers, but about 950 of them didn't really contribute much.

It would be a grave mistake for Republicans to think that new media won them this race. In fact, this turned out to be a pretty standard bread and butter issues election that Harris would have lost in any media environment. Voters handed Republicans this big win so they could do two basic things, bring down prices and secure the border. They don't really want to hear about moving the Department of Environmental Protection to Oklahoma or decimating the deep state as fine as those ideas may be.

Presidential mandates, such as the one Trump now has, are like hiring a guy to fix up stuff around your house. If you tell him the sink and toilet are broken and he proceeds to improve your roof, refinish your basement and widen your deck, but the sink and toilet still don't work, you get a new handyman. If Republicans can make life cheaper and fix the border, then voters will reward them no matter where they get their news. If not, then Elon Musk and Joe Rogan will not be enough to stave off a vengeful defeat.

I'm David Marcus, author of Charade, The COVID Lies That Crushed a Nation. You've been listening to the Fox News Rundown. And now, stay up to date by subscribing to this podcast at foxnewspodcasts.com. Listen ad-free on Fox News Podcasts Plus on Apple Podcasts. And Prime members can listen to the show ad-free on Amazon Music. And for up-to-the-minute news, go to foxnews.com. ♪

Cudlow on Fox Business is now on the go for podcast fans. Get key interviews with the biggest business newsmakers of the day. The Cudlow podcast will be available on the go after the show every weekday at foxbusinesspodcasts.com or wherever you download your favorite podcasts.