cover of episode The Edinburgh Body Snatchers from Cautionary Tales

The Edinburgh Body Snatchers from Cautionary Tales

2024/10/25
logo of podcast Where's Dia?

Where's Dia?

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
旁白
知名游戏《文明VII》的开场动画预告片旁白。
Topics
旁白:本集讲述了1827年爱丁堡因医学解剖需要尸体,而导致伯克和黑尔犯下系列谋杀案的故事。案件揭示了市场需求与伦理道德之间的冲突,以及法律在监管此类‘令人厌恶的市场’时的困境。当时的法律虽然没有明文禁止买卖尸体,但买卖尸体本身就存在着巨大的伦理问题,而伯克和黑尔的行为更是将这种伦理问题推向了极端,最终导致了悲剧的发生。整个事件也反映出当时社会对尸体来源的矛盾态度,一方面需要尸体用于医学研究和教学,另一方面又对盗墓和谋杀等行为深恶痛绝。 旁白:本案中,伯克和黑尔最初只是偶然发现贩卖尸体可以获利,但随着利益的驱动,他们逐渐走向了犯罪的深渊。他们利用了法律的漏洞,也利用了社会对尸体来源的忽视,最终酿成了惨剧。他们的行为不仅触犯了道德底线,也暴露了当时社会监管的缺失。 旁白:本案也引发了人们对‘令人厌恶的市场’的思考。一些市场,即使在经济上是有效的,但由于其涉及的伦理道德问题,而被社会所不容。如何平衡市场效率与伦理道德,是一个值得深思的问题。 蒂姆·哈福德:通过对爱丁堡掘尸案的分析,我们可以看到,在缺乏监管和法律明确禁止的情况下,市场需求会催生出一些‘令人厌恶的市场’,而这些市场往往伴随着严重的伦理问题和社会风险。在解决此类问题时,我们不能仅仅关注市场效率,更要考虑伦理道德和社会公平。 蒂姆·哈福德:爱丁堡掘尸案也促使了人们对尸体来源的重新思考,最终促成了《解剖法》的通过,为医学学校提供了合法的尸体来源。这说明,在解决‘令人厌恶的市场’问题时,需要寻找一种既能满足市场需求,又能符合伦理道德的解决方案。 蒂姆·哈福德:通过对肾脏买卖的讨论,我们可以看到,即使是那些看似合理的市场交易,也可能因为伦理道德的因素而被禁止。这说明,在制定法律和政策时,需要考虑伦理道德的因素,不能仅仅从经济效率的角度出发。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did William Burke and William Hare start selling bodies?

They saw a business opportunity due to the shortage of cadavers for medical students in Edinburgh.

What was the legal status of selling human bodies in 1820s Edinburgh?

Selling bodies was not illegal as human bodies were not considered property that could be owned or stolen.

Why did Dr. Knox's assistant insist on removing the nightshirt from the body?

The nightshirt legally belonged to someone, and Dr. Knox could get in trouble for buying it.

What was the main source of cadavers before Burke and Hare?

Grave robbers or resurrectionists who dug up recently buried corpses.

Why did the authorities mostly look the other way regarding grave robbing?

They didn't want to disrupt the medical schools, which needed bodies for study.

What proposal did the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh make to address the cadaver shortage?

Create a legal, regulated market where living people could sell the right to use their body after death.

Why did Burke and Hare eventually get caught?

They murdered a well-known local figure, Daft Jamie, whose disappearance couldn't be ignored.

What was the Anatomy Act of 1832 intended to do?

It gave medical schools the right to take bodies from workhouses, prisons, or hospitals if unclaimed within 48 hours of death.

Why did Alvin Roth propose kidney exchanges instead of legalizing kidney sales?

To avoid the repugnance associated with selling organs while still increasing the supply of kidneys for transplant.

How did Dr. Knox react to the public outrage after the Burke and Hare scandal?

He ignored the protesters and continued his lectures, emphasizing the importance of cadavers for medical education.

Chapters
The episode explores the moral and legal implications of the body trade in 1820s Edinburgh, focusing on the actions of William Burke and William Hare, who supplied bodies to medical schools, and the legal loopholes that allowed such practices.
  • Edinburgh was a center for anatomical study with a shortage of cadavers.
  • Burke and Hare exploited this shortage by supplying bodies, initially through natural deaths, but later through murder.
  • The legal system at the time did not consider human bodies as property, thus not illegal to sell.

Shownotes Transcript

Enjoy this episode from Cautionary Tales. In 1827, Edinburgh, Scotland was a world centre for anatomical study, but there was a shortage of cadavers for medical students to dissect. Two men, William Burke and William Hare, spotted a grim business opportunity. They began sourcing bodies - by any means possible...Host Tim Harford's hair-raising story explores a question: what makes some markets acceptable, and others repugnant?If you enjoy it, find Cautionary Tales) wherever you listen to podcasts.

See omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.