Scott Peterson May Get a New Trial - A Look Back at the Case: A "True Crime Christmas" Special | Ep. 975
The Megyn Kelly Show
Deep Dive
Why is Scott Peterson seeking a new trial?
Scott Peterson is seeking a new trial based on new evidence and theories, including the claim that Laci Peterson may have been abducted and killed by a burglary gang, not by him. He has been granted access to additional discovery materials to support this theory, including testing a mattress found in a van near the Peterson home and re-examining duct tape used in the crime.
What is the significance of the burglary gang theory in Scott Peterson's case?
The burglary gang theory suggests that Laci Peterson witnessed a burglary across the street, was abducted, and later killed by the gang. The defense argues that the gang dumped her body in the marina to frame Scott Peterson. However, this theory is widely criticized as implausible, given the lack of evidence and the absurdity of burglars driving around with a body and then framing someone else.
What role does the L.A. Innocence Project play in Scott Peterson's case?
The L.A. Innocence Project has taken up Scott Peterson's case, arguing that there may have been procedural errors and undisclosed evidence that could exonerate him. However, critics argue that the organization has shifted its focus to high-profile cases for publicity rather than focusing on legitimate wrongful convictions.
What is the defense's argument regarding the duct tape found on Laci Peterson's body?
The defense argues that the duct tape found on Laci Peterson's body could contain DNA evidence that might exonerate Scott Peterson. They claim that if DNA from someone other than Scott is found on the tape, it could support the theory that someone else was involved in her murder.
Why is the defense focusing on a mattress found in a van near the Peterson home?
The defense is focusing on a mattress found in a van near the Peterson home because initial tests suggested it might have blood on it. They argue that if DNA from an unknown male is found on the mattress, it could point to another suspect. However, without a direct link to Laci Peterson, this evidence is considered meaningless by critics.
What is the prosecution's stance on the evidence against Scott Peterson?
The prosecution maintains that the evidence against Scott Peterson is overwhelming, including his suspicious behavior, the discovery of Laci's hair in his boat, his affair with Amber Frey, and his attempts to flee. They argue that the circumstantial evidence, combined with his lies and actions, clearly points to his guilt.
What is the significance of Scott Peterson's behavior after Laci's disappearance?
Scott Peterson's behavior after Laci's disappearance was highly suspicious. He lied about his whereabouts, changed his story multiple times, dyed his hair, and attempted to flee with $15,000 in cash. His lack of emotion and failure to cooperate with investigators further raised red flags, leading many to believe he was involved in her murder.
What is the defense's argument regarding eyewitness testimony in the case?
The defense argues that eyewitness testimony, such as claims of seeing a pregnant woman being forced into a van, could exonerate Scott Peterson. However, critics point out that eyewitness testimony is often unreliable, especially in high-stress situations, and that such claims are speculative and lack corroborating evidence.
What is the significance of the watch found in a pawn shop in the case?
The defense claims that a watch found in a pawn shop could be linked to Laci Peterson, suggesting it was stolen by the burglary gang. However, without a serial number or definitive proof that the watch belonged to Laci, this evidence is considered weak and speculative by critics.
What is the likelihood of Scott Peterson being granted a new trial?
The likelihood of Scott Peterson being granted a new trial depends on whether the court finds a Brady violation, meaning exculpatory evidence was withheld. While the defense has presented new theories and evidence, critics argue that these claims are implausible and lack sufficient proof to warrant a retrial.
- New evidence suggests Laci Peterson may have been a victim of a burglary gone wrong.
- The role of circumstantial evidence in the case is debated.
- The Los Angeles Innocence Project's involvement is discussed.
Shownotes Transcript