Scamala: Kamala Harris Unmasked | Episode 2 - That's Senator to You
36:35 Share

I am one of many Americans who bought a gun within the last year. While I get to the range as much as I can, I usually go with my wife, and sometimes we put it off because the guns are really loud for her, and sometimes the recoil is a lot for her, and sometimes the recoil can be uncomfortable. Fortunately, this doesn't have to be the case. There's a single accessory that will make going to the range a lot more enjoyable. Silencers make shooting significantly quieter.

Thank you.

and their dedicated team will help you find the perfect fit for your firearm. They handle the hard part. They'll help you submit all your paperwork. You can get your suppressor from the comfort of your home at silencershop.com slash Shapiro. These guys really know what they're doing. They're huge advocates of your Second Amendment rights. Silencer Shop doesn't just support your Second Amendment rights. They fight for them. They spend a lot of time and money aggressively lobbying, fighting lawsuits, and supporting pro-Second Amendment legislation across the nation. You got to check them out. Go to silencershop.com slash Shapiro. Let Silencer Shop help you make your guns better. That's silencershop.com slash Shapiro.

Welcome to another round of Drawing Board or Miro Board. Today, we talk brainstorms with UX designer Brian. Let's go. First question. You thought you'd see everyone's idea in the team brainstorm, but you've got a grand total of one. Drawing Board or Miro Board? Drawing Board. In Miro, the team can add ideas now or later. And with Privacy Mode, we can keep them anonymous until they're good to share. Correct.

And

And he's wild.

This is the kind of hard-hitting, fact-based content that's missing in today's media landscape. While the left-wing outlets spin their narratives, we're committed to giving you the real story, no matter whom it offends. Your support allows us to create content that matters, content that gives you the facts and the truth no one else will because of their own agendas. We're not beholden to corporate interests or

Thank you.

Then join us. Go to dailywire.com slash subscribe and become a member today. Let's continue this fight together. The truth matters, and with your help, we'll make sure it's heard. Now, let's dive into Scamala, Kamala Harris unmasked, and see what the left doesn't want you to know.

When most Americans first became aware of Kamala Harris, she was already a senator and she'd already been touted by the legacy media as a potential presidential candidate. There's a great district attorney in San Francisco whose name is Kamala Harris. She's brilliant. She's smart. She doesn't look anything like anybody you ever see on Law and Order, yet she's tough and she's got a big future. They call her the female Barack Obama. There was a reason for that.

From the day Barack Obama called her the hottest woman in American politics, I happen to mention that Kamala Harris is the best-looking attorney general in the country. she had been treated as the next big thing, a female Barack Obama. But something funny happened on the way to the presidency. The public got to know Kamala Harris, and the more they saw her, the less they liked her. Her grasping, manipulative inauthenticity grew stronger with every public display. The more Kamala Harris wanted it, the less the American public wanted her.

Kamala Harris was sworn into the United States Senate as a senator from California in January 2017. She was determined to make her mark, not in terms of legislation or policy, but in terms of celebrity. The day after her inauguration, she spoke at the Women's March, where she praised the pussy-hatted brigade for their bravery. What a beautiful sight I see. What do my eyes hold? This is an extraordinary day.

The circus had begun. Kamala's chief role in the Senate was to play prosecutor. But where she had once appeared even spoken and even somewhat genuine, she now had developed verbal and linguistic tics that made her annoying and cloying. She nodded her head in vehement agreement with herself. Her hand motions were too large, too practiced.

Her voice ranged into nasal indignation at every turn, and every questioning was a righteously furious assault. Desperate for attention, Kamala tried to play up her supposed authenticity, and at every turn, became more inauthentic.

And the truth is that these folks are playing politics with public health. So they're engaged in all of this happy talk that is booked

Not truth. Let's just go into 2018 and be joyful warriors. I like that term, joyful warriors. Kamala was active in the ouster of Senator Al Franken. After the Minnesota senator was caught with his hands in the cookie jar, or rather, near the breasts of talk show hosts years before in a picture captured while that host was asleep, Kamala quickly came out for Al Franken's resignation. That, conveniently enough, opened up a slot for her on the Judiciary Committee. And it was from there that Kamala truly began to unleash

her unpleasant persona. In 2017, interviewing Attorney General Jeff Sessions, she would not allow him to answer questions and talked over him. The policy is based- Did you ask that it would be shown to you?

In the aftermath, she would complain of being interrupted. The media would predictably pick up that narrative.

But Kamala's Senate starring role was yet to come. That starring role came in 2018, when Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy resigned at the age of 81. President Donald Trump, guided by the scholars at the Federalist Society, picked D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill the slot. Kamala saw this as her time to shine. She would single-handedly destroy Kavanaugh and save the Constitution. She immediately released a statement minutes after his nomination, calling him a, quote, direct and fundamental threat to the promise of equality. At the

At the very first hearing, she launched into a long speech introducing herself to the American public as a presidential candidate. I was starting kindergarten and I was a bus, in a bus, a school bus, on my way to Thousand Oaks Elementary School as part of the second class of students as busing desegregated students.

Berkeley, California public schools. All of this was merely the beginning of Kamala's dishonest pyrotechnics. At the time of the Kavanaugh hearings, the Robert Mueller special investigation into supposed Russian collusion with the 2016 Trump campaign was the top story in the news. So Kamala decided to ask Kavanaugh about whether he himself had been involved in some way in the case. To do so, she threw out a weird theory that Kavanaugh had talked with someone at the firm of Kasowitz, Benson, and

and Torres, the law firm for President Trump, about Robert Mueller. Kavanaugh clearly had no idea what Kamala was getting at, but she persisted. Have you had any conversation about Robert Mueller or his investigation with anyone at that firm?

The next day, all of the focus was on Kamala. Who was she suggesting Kavanaugh had talked to? What sort of corrupt arrangement was she uncovering? The answer? She had nothing. The entire accusation was total nonsense.

She literally tried to manufacture a gotcha out of whole cloth in an attempt to catch Kavanaugh in what is called a perjury lie, where somebody lies by accident and then is prosecuted.

it didn't work. But all of that was prelude to the big show. On September 16th, 2018, the Washington Post came forward with an extraordinary accusation against Kavanaugh, an accusation from California professor Christine Blasey Ford. Ford alleged that as a teenager some four decades before, she had attended a party where Kavanaugh and his high school friends were drunk and attempted to hurt her. She could not name the location, the date, or the time of the party. She could not name any of the other people present at the

at the party. It turns out that Ford had attempted to make the allegation anonymously originally. She had called Representative Anna Eshoo of California, who had referred that story to Senator Dianne Feinstein. Feinstein had asked for a letter with the details. Presumably, Feinstein didn't find the story all that compelling because it went nowhere.

Later, Eshoo went to Kamala Harris. And then, all of a sudden, the information began leaking to the press. Before Ford's testimony, Kamala did an interview with CBS News in which she touted Ford's heroism and said she believed Ford even though she'd never actually talked to her. I believe her. Lazy Ford eventually testified before the Senate. Her testimony was vague and questionable. I was pushed onto the bed and Brett got on top of me. He began running his hands over my body and grinding into me.

I believed he was going to rape me. I tried to yell for help. Brett's assault on me drastically altered my life for a very long time. I was too afraid and ashamed to tell anyone these details. But Kamala stepped in again to call her a hero. You are sitting here before members of the United States Senate's Judiciary Committee because you had the courage to

to come forward. I want to thank you for your courage, and I want to tell you I believe you. I believe you. And I believe many Americans across this country believe you. None of this stopped Kamala, who questioned Kavanaugh savagely. Judge Kavanaugh, have you taken a professionally administered polygraph test as it relates to this issue? So I'm going to ask you one last time. Are you willing to ask the White House to authorize

These were scurrilous attacks designed to destroy Brett Kavanaugh as a judicial nominee and as a man. Kavanaugh would defend himself in passionate terms. This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit.

fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.

This is a circus. And indeed, Kavanaugh would be confirmed by the Senate on October 6th, 2018. Akamala had her moment and the launch point for her presidential campaign. Indeed, she announced for the presidency just months later, January 21st, 2019. I stand before you today clear-eyed about the fight ahead and what has to be done. With faith in God, with fidelity to country...

And with the fighting spirit I got from my mother, I stand before you today to announce my candidacy for President of the United States.

We'll get to more on that in a moment. First, are you still struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns? Nearly one in four Americans owe back taxes. And the worst thing you can do is ignore the problem as penalties pile up, interest accumulates, and the IRS loses patience. Handling this alone can be a huge mistake and cost you thousands of dollars. So I think your best offense is Tax Network USA. With over 14 years of experience, the experts at Tax Network USA have saved clients millions in back taxes.

Regardless of the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage. Tax Network USA offers three key services, protection, compliance, and settlement. Upon signing up, Tax Network USA will immediately contact the IRS to secure a protection order, ensuring that aggressive collection activities like garnishments, levies, or property seizures are halted.

Even if you haven't filed in a while, Tax Network USA's expert tax preparers will update all your filings to eliminate the risk of IRS enforcement. Then they'll create a settlement strategy to reduce or completely eliminate your tax debt. The IRS is the largest collection agency on planet Earth. And since tax season is over, collection season has begun. Talk to my friends at Tax Network USA. Call today 1-800-245-6000 or visit their website.

Kamala's campaign for the presidency started like a house of fire. The media, focusing on her intersectional credentials, a black woman, a second Obama, saw her as an early frontrunner in what would undoubtedly be a crowded field. Early polling put her at the top of the Democratic keep, second only to Bernie Sanders, whom it was broadly believed...

would decline as the field consolidated. Kamala Harris launched her presidential campaign on Martin Luther King Jr. Day with a rally in her hometown of Oakland, California. The event drew an estimated 20,000 people and she attempted to position herself as both the underdog and the popular choice of the black community, like Barack Obama before her. Ditching her tough-on-crime, top-cop talk, she spoke of herself as a progressive prosecutor, ready to bring justice and equality to the forefront of American politics. I'm running to fight for an America...

where no mother or father has to teach their young son that people may stop him, arrest him, chase him, or kill him because of his race.

She was positioning herself on the left of the Democratic Party in an attempt to shoulder out potential competitors like Beto O'Rourke of Texas and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, both of whom were widely perceived as direct competitors. America's story has always been written by people who can see what can be unburdened by what

She branded her campaign Kamala for the people. That branding was a mistake. Kamala had never been a populist politician. She'd always been the candidate of the elite Democratic Party. Her logo was a disaster area, confusion of too many words and bizarre color scheme. And

And her for the people slogan, a riff on the prosecutor's introduction in court, Kamala Harris for the people, your honor, fell absolutely flat. Nonetheless, she raised huge cash out of the gate. During the first 24 hours of her campaign, she cleared $1.5 million in donations, tying Bernie Sanders' 2016 launch record.

Within weeks, though, she would begin to flounder. In February 2019, an actor named Jussie Smollett alleged that he had been beaten in the middle of the night on the streets of Chicago by two white men wearing red hats. The two men had been shouting, this is MAGA country, as they looped a rope around his neck and threw bleach on him. Who says, ****, Empire, ****, this MAGA country, ****?

Seeking to be the first out of the gate to capitalize on this sensational story, Harris tweeted that this was a modern-day lynching and suggested that the alleged incident serve as the basis for pushing a law she supported. As should have been obvious from the outset, however, the story was a lie. Harris had to backtrack.

She also jumped into controversy surrounding Joe Biden, her chief rival from the Democratic Political Center. When seven women came forward claiming that Biden had engaged in unwanted touching, Kamala claimed she believed the women. I believe them and I respect them being able to tell their story and have an approach to do it. The money train rolled on. During the first quarter of the year, she raised $12 million, a solid showing for a candidate on the rise.

Still, Kamala's campaign struggled with internal organization from the beginning. Reports of infighting, lack of clear strategy, and inconsistent messaging began to surface, hinting at deeper issues that would plague her run. Those stories, of course, would only break out into the open as her campaign began to melt down. That meltdown, surprisingly, began with what should have been Kamala's breakout moment. During the first debate of the primary season, June 27, 2019, Kamala, through luck of the draw—there were two groups of Democratic candidates—

Faced off against Bernie Sanders and in particular Joe Biden, the former Obama vice president and new presidential frontrunner. This was her opportunity to knock Biden out of the race and to steal his voting base. And she took it. First, she set herself up as the adult in the room by intervening in a spat between other candidates. America does not want to witness a food fight. They want to know how we're going to put food on their table. A canned line went over well, somehow. But then Kamala got serious. She slammed Biden as a racist. It was hurtful.

to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. And it was not only that, but you also worked with them to oppose busing. And, you know, there was a little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools, and she was bused to school every day.

And that little girl was me. This confrontation brought her significant attention and a temporary boost in the polls. CNN headline, Harris's attack on Joe Biden steals spotlight at Democratic primary debate. Her campaign website began selling merch reading, that little girl was me. Pollsters suggested that her support had doubled from 8% before the debate nationally to 17% afterward. She raised $2 million within 24 hours. But this moment of glory was short-lived.

Kamala's inability to sustain the momentum revealed a critical weakness, unpreparedness. As with Justice Kavanaugh, Kamala could launch an attack, but she rarely backed it up. She had no command of details or evidence. Her walkback began almost immediately with Joe Biden's comments on national television suggesting that her remarks were baseless and scurrilous. I thought we were friends and I hope we still will be.

You know, she asked me to go out and call me and asked me to go to her convention and be the guy from outside of California to nominate her at her convention for the Senate seat. I did. On MSNBC's Morning Joe, Kamala softened and walked back her attack on Biden. So he shouldn't have worked with them is what you're saying? I'm saying, no, I'm saying that the characterization and the nostalgia about who they were, you

I find to be misplaced and it was hurtful to me.

to hear that we would be nostalgic about people who, if they had their way, I would not serve in the United States Senate. Her position and Biden's on busing were substantially the same. Kamala's policy positions were another area of concern. Her stance on health care was emblematic of her campaign's broader issues. Initially, Kamala supported Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All plan, which would eliminate private insurance. She even went on television and said so. I believe the solution, and I actually feel very strongly about this, is that we need to have Medicare for All.

But as criticism mounted, particularly from centrist voters and health care professionals, she wavered. The role of private insurance, are you limiting that to something like cosmetic insurance? Or what is the exact role of private insurance? To cover what is not otherwise covered. So that includes what?

Very little, because almost everything will be covered. Kamala tried to strike a middle ground, proposing a plan that would maintain private insurance options while moving toward universal coverage. This flip-flop alienated both progressives and moderates, leaving her without any solid base of support. Her inconsistency extended to other issues as well. On criminal justice reform, Kamala struggled to reconcile her record as a tough-on-crime prosecutor with her new progressive platform. During a televised town hall, Kamala was asked about her stance on the death penalty for convicted cop killers.

Her response was a convoluted attempt to balance her past actions with her current campaign platform, resulting in a muddled message that pleased no one. My career has been based on an understanding, one, that as a prosecutor, my duty was to seek and make sure that the most vulnerable and voiceless among us are protected. And that is why I have personally prosecuted violent crime that includes rape, child molestation and homicide.

Critics on the left and the right pointed to her past actions, such as her defense of the death penalty and her handling of truancy laws, which disproportionately affected low-income and minority communities. These contradictions eroded her credibility and trustworthiness. People were beginning to see through Kamala Harris's act. The real problem, however, was not Kamala's politics. It was

It was her personality. Treated with kid gloves for her entire career, Kamala's sudden fame exposed her, sanded off all the varnish. It became clearer day after day that she was simply unlikable. Kamala quickly became the race's most inauthentic politician. Her most obvious foible was an unfortunate behavioral tick. When asked a tough question, she'd break into nearly uncontrollable laughter. Whether during interviews or debates, Kamala's tendency to laugh at inappropriate times often came across as dismissive, out of touch.

Just plain weird. This behavior was not just a minor quirk. It became a symbol of her inability to connect with voters on a deeper level. And that too. I bet he's entitled to his opinion. Well, I think we've got a couple of vicious Chris with that. I was the only one in the room who thought we were still in the game.

In just one second, we'll get to more. First, your God-given freedoms are, in fact, under threat. Your elected officials who have sworn to defend your freedom, well, we know they can't be trusted. They think they can violate your right to protect your family and force their delusions onto your kids. But you know what they can't take away is self-reliance and peace of mind. So equip yourself for anything with emergency items like water filtration, a charged solar generator,

Now the government,

even says that in case of earthquake, in case of fire, in case of all sorts of emergencies, you should make sure that you have enough on hand to take care of yourself and your family. That's what preparewithben.com is for. Head on over to preparewithben.com. Save 200 bucks per kit. Free shipping is included. Prepare with Ben. It's

All of these issues broke out into the open at the next Democratic primary debate on July 31st, 2019. Joe Biden opened the debate by approaching Kamala for a handshake, muttering, Go easy on me, kid. Go easy on me, kid. How you doing? You good? Jake Tapper of CNN brought up the attack from the last debate,

And Kamala did exactly what Joe Biden wanted. She went easy on him. Vice President Biden was in the United States Senate working with segregationists to oppose busing, which was the vehicle by which we would integrate America's public schools.

Had I been in the United States Senate at that time, I would have been completely on the other side of the aisle. And let's be clear about this. Had those segregationists their way, I would not be a member of the United States Senate. Cory Booker would not be a member of the United States Senate. And Barack Obama would not have been in a position to nominate him to the title he now holds. But that wasn't the moment that killed the Harris campaign. That moment came at the hands of former Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard, running at Kamala from both the left and the right.

and the center. Gabbard delivered a scathing critique that many viewed as a death blow to Harris's candidacy. Gabbard began by accusing Kamala of hypocrisy, pointing out that despite presenting herself as a progressive reformer, her record told a different story. She highlighted that Kamala had blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row, a charge that struck at the heart of Kamala's claims to fairness and justice. I want to bring the conversation back to the broken criminal justice system that is disproportionately negatively impacting black and brown people all across this country today.

Senator Harris says she's proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she'll be a prosecutor president, but I'm deeply concerned about this record. There are too many examples to cite, but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence...

She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way. Senator Harris, when you were in a position

to make a difference and an impact in these people's lives, you did not. And worse yet, in the case of those who were on death row,

This was, of course, the first time she'd ever publicly faced serious pushback, and she collapsed in the face of Gabbard's withering assault. The media and public reaction to the exchange was swift and harsh. Many declared Gabbard the clear winner of that debate segment,

and declared Harris on the ropes. Kamala attempted to deflect by attacking Gabbard's own record and questioning her standing in the race. These responses fell flat. They failed to address the substantive criticisms that had been laid out. I think that it's unfortunate that we have someone on this stage who is attempting to be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States, who during the Obama administration spent four years full-time on Fox News criticizing President Obama. That's ridiculous, Senator Harris. Who has spent full-time...

criticizing people on this stage as affiliated with the Democratic Party. The confrontation significantly damaged Kamala's campaign. Her poll numbers dropped precipitously, and the criticism from Gabbard stuck with voters, casting serious doubt on Kamala's authenticity and trustworthiness. Gabbard's attack was not just a momentary setback, but a turning point from which Kamala's campaign never recovered.

It highlighted the vulnerabilities and contradictions in Kamala's record, and her inability to effectively counter those criticisms in real time underscored the lack of preparedness and strategic depth within her campaign. Meanwhile, Kamala's gaps became more and more unwatchable. This is a conversation I have heard in every campaign I have, and now here is the operative word, won. And you all are looking at me, okay, Kamala, why do you say this? Why do you think we have so much more in common than what separates us? Well, I'll tell you.

I know it based on every personal and professional experience I've had. I know it based on what I call the three in the morning thought. Okay, y'all looking at me, where are you going with this? Okay. Her inauthenticity was like an onion. Peel one layer, find another layer of inauthenticity beneath. Her most virally inauthentic moment came when her campaign got a bus. Senator Harris is kicking off a five-day bus tour. Look at that bus!

The mockery was immense and well-deserved. In response, Kamala attended big-dollar fundraisers, avoided the campaign trail, avoided the press. That was, of course, where she was most comfortable with the money people in the Democratic Party. Kamala for the people, indeed. As the campaign progressed, Kamala's support steadily continued to decline.

By the fall of 2019, her poll numbers had cratered. Her fundraising efforts were faltering. Despite her attempts to shift her campaign's focus to Iowa, she wasn't picking up ground even there. Internal campaign memos revealed a chaotic organization with staff turnover and a lack of cohesive strategy contributing to the campaign's unraveling. Politico reported in October 2019 that Harris was, quote, hemorrhaging cash and in danger of lacking the resources to mount a competitive bid against better funded rivals in Iowa.

Kamala attempted to reshuffle the cards in order to rescue a campaign that was still being viewed as a likely early-stage juggernaut just three months ago. On November 29th, the New York Times ran an expose on Kamala's campaign. It was effectively a campaign obituary. Noting that she was the only 2020 Democrat who has fallen hard out of the top tier of candidates, the Times called her an uneven campaigner who changes her message and tactics to little effect and has a staff torn into factions. The

The Times reported a resignation letter from Kelly Mellenbacher, the state operations director. In it, Mellenbacher excoriated the campaign. Quote, this is my third presidential campaign and I have never seen an organization treat its staff so poorly. Mellenbacher saved particular ire for Maya Harris, Kamala's sister, the campaign chairwoman.

The Times reported that her, quote, decline is more predictable than surprising. The organizational unsteadiness of Ms. Harris's campaign reflects a longtime personal trait, according to allies. She is a candidate who seeks input from a stable of advisors, but her personal political convictions can be unclear. That was a very nice way of saying the obvious.

Kamala Harris had no principles. By December, facing dwindling resources and an insurmountable gap in the polls, Kamala made the decision to suspend her campaign. In her withdrawal statement, Kamala cited financial difficulties and the need to focus on uniting the Democratic Party. So here's the deal, guys. My campaign for president simply does not have the financial resources to continue and the financial resources we need to continue.

I'm not a billionaire, I can't fund my own campaign, and as the campaign has gone on, it has become harder and harder to raise the money we need to compete. In good faith, I cannot tell you, my supporters and volunteers, that I have a path forward if I don't believe I do. So, to you my supporters, my dear supporters, it is with deep regret, but also with deep gratitude, that I am suspending our campaign today.

But I want to be clear with you. I am still very much in this fight. And I will keep fighting every day for what this campaign has been about. Justice for the people. All the people. However, the reality was clear. She had poisoned herself with the voters and her campaign had been a full-scale disaster area. Mr. Vice President, I'm speaking. I'm speaking. Let's talk about the fact. Yeah, I'm about to.

I'm speaking. It'd be important if you said the truth. If you don't mind letting me finish. For the next few months, Kamala struggled. She remained critical of Joe Biden. In March 2020, when Tara Reid came forward and accused Biden of sexual assault, Kamala backed Reid's case.

But in reality, Biden was in good electoral shape. Kamala was out in the wilderness, but it still wasn't over for her. Kamala Harris may have had one of the most spectacular collapses of any presidential candidate in modern history, but she still had one thing going for her. She was a black woman, and that advantage made itself apparent with the death of George Floyd.

Kamala was an awkward candidate to play racial conflagrationist. She was a former prosecutor married to a white man without any serious record in left-wing race baiting. But the Democratic Party under nominee Joe Biden, an old white man, was desperate.

And there was Kamala waiting. Floyd's death ignited widespread rioting and cries from the left to defund the police. That same month, Kamala Harris sought to reposition herself yet again, this time as a racial justice warrior. On June 1st, as riots burned, Kamala tweeted out a call to chip in to the Minnesota Freedom Fund to, quote, post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota. Those weren't protesters, they were rioters. And now Kamala...

The former top cop was supporting them. Meanwhile, as Joe Biden finished up his victorious primary campaign, he needed to please his black voting base, the people who had elevated him to the nomination over Bernie Sanders. He couldn't do so himself. He had been one of the architects of the 1994 criminal justice scheme that ended with large-scale incarceration disproportionately among black men. And so he had to pander.

Within weeks of Floyd's death, the so-called racial justice movement in his name began calling for Biden to pick a black woman for his running mate. That push had actually begun in April when some 200 black female leaders and activists within the Democratic Party signed an open letter demanding a black female VP pick from Biden. They held a call with Biden in May. And in June, Biden announced that he would be seeking just that, a black woman. On July 20th, Biden said he had four black women on his vice presidential shortlist. Among them, there are four black women.

So that decision is underway right now. One of those women was Kamala Harris. She was the most qualified. The other two were House members and a national security advisor. And only one of the possibilities had the support of the ex-president and sole reason for Joe Biden's political success at the age of 77, Barack Obama.

Behind the scenes, Obama played a pivotal role in Kamala's selection. He recommended her selection to Biden. His endorsement was crucial as it helped to alleviate concerns within the party about Kamala's controversial record and bolster her candidacy with his considerable political capital. Obama's support also helped to overcome opposition from Jill Biden, who, according to all reports, disliked Kamala strongly since her scurrilous attacks on Joe. Now the woman Obama had once called the hottest attorney general in the nation was about to be placed one heartbeat from Obama's old job.

On August 11th, 2020, Joe Biden announced that Kamala Harris would be his vice presidential running mate. I have the great honor to announce that I've picked Kamala Harris, a fearless fighter for the little guy, one of the country's finest public servants, as my running mate, Biden tweeted. For her part, Kamala was now ready to bend the knee, saying Biden, quote, can unify the American people because he's spent his life fighting for us. And as president, he'll build an America that lives up to our ideals. I'm honored to join him as our party's nominee for vice president and do what it takes to make him our commander in chief. I have no doubt that

that I picked the right person to join me as the next vice president of the United States of America. And that's Senator Kamala Harris. Is the answer yes? The answer is absolutely yes, Joe. And I am ready to work. I am ready to do this with you, for you. I'm just deeply honored. Kamala's chemistry with Biden was weak.

They didn't know how to interact with one another. Biden wanted her to be seen, but not heard. He wanted to show her off as the intersectional future without having to take her input. All of that was made apparent during a joint introductory interview on August 23rd, where the two seemed ill at ease. Well, thank you both for sitting down with us. Thanks for having us. Thank you. The process wouldn't become any easier. Kamala was, as always, an awkward campaigner with no expertise on any relevant issue. Her gaffes once again began to pile up. For us at every moment in time, and certainly this one,

to see the moment in time. Which is why we will work together and continue to work together to address these issues, to tackle these challenges, and to work together as we continue to work operating from the new norms, rules, and agreements that we will convene to work together on. The significance of the passage of time

So when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do. There's this whole conversation that's been coming up about electability. Focused on our campaign. Is America ready for that? Well, yes they are. Space is exciting. It spurs our imaginations.

And it forces us to ask big questions. Kamala's vice presidential campaign was intended to be a showcase of her abilities, a testament to her historic candidacy. Instead, it became a glaring exposition on her political inadequacies and public relations missteps. The vice presidential debate juxtaposing Kamala with Vice President Mike Pence was supposed to be a shining moment for Kamala. Her strategy was simple. Play the victim.

From the outset, she attempted to recreate some of her greatest hits from the Senate, in particular, her early PR success, claiming that she'd been victimized by men who interrupted her. Only this time, she would not be interrupted. Mr. Vice President, I'm speaking. I'm speaking. It'd be important if you said the truth. Joe Biden said twice in the debate last week that he's going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.

That was tax cuts that gave the average working family $2,000 in a tax break every single year. Senator, that's the math. That is absolutely not true. Is he only going to repeal part of the Trump tax cuts? If you don't mind letting me finish...

But, like everything else with Kamala, the whole routine was forced and phony. Pence, an unfailingly polite candidate, never attempted to bully Kamala, instead leaving her in the bizarre position of playing the wronged victim in the absence of any victimization. Despite Kamala's attempts to sell a new set of merch on the back of her debate performance, I'm speaking, the attack fell flat.

It was the beginning of a long night for Kamala, who once again fell short in command of the issues and couldn't defend her own record. When questioned about her previous support for the Green New Deal, Kamala attempted to distance herself from the controversial elements of the proposal, despite having co-sponsored it in the Senate. And the American people know that Joe Biden will not ban fracking. That is a fact. That is a fact.

I will repeat that Joe Biden has been very clear that he thinks about growing jobs, which is why he will not increase taxes for anyone who makes less than $400,000 a year. Joe Biden's economic plan, Moody's, which is a reputable Wall Street firm, has said will create 7 million more jobs than Donald Trump's.

And part of those jobs that will be created by Joe Biden are going to be about clean energy and renewable energy. This flip-flopping only served, again, to reinforce the perception that Kamala lacked a firm stance on critical policies. Additionally, her failure to adequately address Pence's pushback on the administration's handling of COVID-19 and the economy lapsed into incoherence.

The debate also exposed Kamala's difficulties in articulating a clear, compelling vision for the future. While Pence methodically laid out the Trump administration's accomplishments and plans, Kamala often relied on broad statements and emotional appeals lacking specificity.

In the end, Kamala's performance was saved, not by her, but by a rogue fly that landed on Mike Pence's head. On such minor things, campaigns turned. To the men and women who serve in law enforcement, and I want everyone to know who puts on the uniform of law enforcement every day, that President Trump and I stand with you. While Biden maintained his lead over President Trump in the polls, problems continued to swirl around Kamala. Allegations resurfaced regarding her handling of sexual harassment complaints while serving as California's Attorney General.

Under Kamala's tenure, the California Department of Justice had paid out $1.1 million in settlements related to sexual harassment claims. That included a notable case involving one of her top aides, Larry Wallace, who resigned after a $400,000 settlement was made following accusations of harassment. Kamala's response to these incidents were inadequate and evasive. Once again, her dishonesty was on full display.

Kamala's team claimed they were unaware of the issues until they were made public, a statement met with widespread skepticism. Kamala, who had attempted to build her career on advocating for victims and promoting accountability, had yet again failed to implement these values within her very own office. In the end, though, Kamala was indeed elected vice president, riding Biden's coattails to the second highest office in the land. Even her announcement of her victory online was awkward and off-putting. "We did it. We did it, Joe."

For his part, Biden touted her as his potential successor, telling interviews that if he disagreed with Kamala, perhaps he would step down. A fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign. But Kamala's lackluster showing as a failed presidential candidate, and then again as vice president, put her on thin ice. She'd soon break that ice. I'd like to talk to you about a new book, Full Time, Work and the Meaning of Life by David Bonson.

In a time where work is being heralded as the cause of societal pain, depression, and anxiety, full-time is screaming the exact opposite, that we're created to work and that our work provides unique meaning and purpose in our lives. We are living in a crisis of apathy and ignorance regarding work's existential nature. There's no shortage of books telling people to work less, to find balance, to think less of career, and more of things that bring them happiness.

In Full Time, Bonson makes the case that our understanding of work and its role in our lives is deeply flawed. He argues that the time has come to stop tiptoeing around the issues that matter, that separating one's identity from what they do is demonstrably false, and that a low view of work is leading to disastrous policy proposals and cultural attitudes. It is in work of every kind that we discover our meaning and purpose. A significant and successful life is one rooted in full-time productivity and cultivation of God's created world.

A life of meaning is right under your nose, and with it, the joy and peace of a life well-lived. Available for purchase at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Visit fulltimebook.com for more information. That's fulltimebook.com. Welcome to another round of Drawing Board or Miro Board. Today, we discuss technical diagramming with systems architect Maya. Let's go. First question. You've spent 10 hours slogging over a sequence diagram that should have taken five. Drawing Board or Miro Board? Drawing Board.

And if I'm being honest, Miro would probably cut that time down by half. You know, with its AI tools and ready-to-go templates. Next, your diagrams become so bulky, it's more complex than the solar system. But all it takes is a few clicks and... It's Miro. I've used those technical shape packs way too many times. Now, the final question. Everyone's brought in, but you have to make all these tasks all the time.

Get started today at miro.com slash diagram now.