cover of episode Ben Reacts: Daniel Penny Verdict

Ben Reacts: Daniel Penny Verdict

2024/12/9
logo of podcast The Ben Shapiro Show

The Ben Shapiro Show

People
B
Ben Shapiro
Topics
本·夏皮罗对丹尼尔·佩尼被判无罪表示赞同,认为陪审团做出了正确的决定。他详细分析了案件的背景,指出乔丹·尼利在纽约地铁上具有攻击性行为,威胁到其他乘客的安全。佩尼作为一名退伍军人,采取制服控制手段制止尼利的行为,其目的是制服尼利,而不是杀害他。夏皮罗认为,本案中存在大量的证据表明尼利的死亡并非直接由佩尼的制服控制导致,而是多种因素共同作用的结果,包括尼利本身的健康状况、吸毒以及精神疾病。他批评了纽约市的起诉存在偏见,认为如果施救者是白人而死者是黑人,则更容易被起诉。夏皮罗指出,此案从一开始就被错误地起诉,因为整个事件都被录像记录下来,并且有其他目击者试图帮助佩尼制止尼利的攻击行为。他认为,检察官是极左翼的索罗斯派检察官,并且法官试图确保佩尼被定罪。夏皮罗还批评了法官在陪审团对过失杀人罪名无法达成一致后,撤销了该罪名,以便陪审团可以考虑较低的指控,这违反了最初的判决书。他认为,轻罪过失杀人的标准是疏忽大意,在本案中显然不存在。夏皮罗还提到尼利当时体内含有合成大麻,并被诊断患有精神分裂症,这些因素都可能导致其死亡。他批评了尼利的家人在事件发生后才出现,并要求赔偿的行为。夏皮罗总结说,此案不应该被起诉,检察官应该被解雇。他认为,此判决结果反映了纽约民众对城市无政府状态和黑命贵运动的厌倦,并呼吁改变对这类事件的思考方式。他希望佩尼能够得到生活机会,并表示我们需要更多像他这样敢于挺身而出的人。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why was Daniel Penny acquitted in the Jordan Neely case?

The jury found Penny not guilty due to his actions being justified as self-defense and protection of others on the subway from Neely's aggressive behavior. The defense successfully argued that Neely's death was not solely caused by the chokehold but by a combination of factors including his mental health issues and drug use.

What evidence supported Daniel Penny's defense?

The defense presented evidence that Neely's death was due to a combination of sickle cell crisis, schizophrenia, the struggle, restraint, and synthetic marijuana in his system, rather than solely the chokehold. Witnesses also testified that they were in fear for their lives due to Neely's threatening behavior.

Why did the prosecution's case against Daniel Penny face challenges?

The prosecution faced challenges as the jury sided with the defense's argument that Penny's actions were justified self-defense. Additionally, the judge's handling of the trial, including dismissing the manslaughter count to consider a lower charge, was seen as favoring the prosecution, but ultimately the jury found Penny not guilty.

How did the racial dynamics play into the trial?

The trial had underlying racial dynamics, with an unspoken assumption that Penny's actions were racially motivated, similar to the Derek Chauvin case. However, no evidence supported this claim, and the jury's verdict indicated a rejection of such assumptions.

What broader implications does the Daniel Penny verdict have?

The verdict signals a broader rejection of the idea that criminality is justified by racial status or poverty, and a shift towards supporting self-defense and public intervention in dangerous situations. It also calls for a reevaluation of the role of bystanders and the need for more people like Penny to step in when necessary.

Chapters
The jury found Daniel Penny not guilty in the Jordan Neely case. The verdict is analyzed in the context of self-defense, the nature of the chokehold, and the actions of Jordan Neely on the subway. Evidence presented during the trial is discussed.
  • Daniel Penny acquitted of all charges
  • Jury found self-defense justifiable
  • Jordan Neely's erratic behavior and threats on the subway
  • Evidence questioned the direct link between the chokehold and death

Shownotes Transcript

The jury got it right—Daniel Penny is found not guilty. Ben Shapiro breaks down why this verdict matters for self-defense, accountability, and public safety in America. Watch Ben react now!