The jury found Penny not guilty due to his actions being justified as self-defense and protection of others on the subway from Neely's aggressive behavior. The defense successfully argued that Neely's death was not solely caused by the chokehold but by a combination of factors including his mental health issues and drug use.
The defense presented evidence that Neely's death was due to a combination of sickle cell crisis, schizophrenia, the struggle, restraint, and synthetic marijuana in his system, rather than solely the chokehold. Witnesses also testified that they were in fear for their lives due to Neely's threatening behavior.
The prosecution faced challenges as the jury sided with the defense's argument that Penny's actions were justified self-defense. Additionally, the judge's handling of the trial, including dismissing the manslaughter count to consider a lower charge, was seen as favoring the prosecution, but ultimately the jury found Penny not guilty.
The trial had underlying racial dynamics, with an unspoken assumption that Penny's actions were racially motivated, similar to the Derek Chauvin case. However, no evidence supported this claim, and the jury's verdict indicated a rejection of such assumptions.
The verdict signals a broader rejection of the idea that criminality is justified by racial status or poverty, and a shift towards supporting self-defense and public intervention in dangerous situations. It also calls for a reevaluation of the role of bystanders and the need for more people like Penny to step in when necessary.
The jury got it right—Daniel Penny is found not guilty. Ben Shapiro breaks down why this verdict matters for self-defense, accountability, and public safety in America. Watch Ben react now!