cover of episode The Parents Aren’t All Right

The Parents Aren’t All Right

2024/10/9
logo of podcast The Daily

The Daily

Chapters

The Surgeon General issued a rare warning about the high stress levels of parents in today's intensive parenting era. This style of parenting involves significant time and money investment in children's development, causing stress and impacting parents' well-being.
  • Intensive parenting is characterized by constant engagement and enrichment activities for children.
  • The Surgeon General's warning highlights the negative impact of intensive parenting on parents' mental health.
  • The constant pressure to optimize children's development contributes to parental stress.

Shownotes Transcript

Support for this podcast comes from Oven Grid. Tom Turnwald runs an Ohio millwork company that was started by his father and employs his kids. I'm in favor of wind farms because I'm committed to attracting talent to our community. And the school districts with wind turbines get resources that can make a huge difference in kids' lives.

Since 2012, an oven grid wind farm has strengthened the economy and contributes millions to the community each year. To learn more about where energy meets humanity, visit ovengrid.com. That's ovengrid.com. From The New York Times, I'm Michael Barbaro. This is The Daily. For years, research on hyper-attentive parenting has focused on all the ways that it can hurt children.

But now, the U.S. government is reframing that conversation and asking how our new era of parenting is actually bad for parents themselves. Today, my colleague Claire Kane-Miller on why raising children is now a risk to your health. It's Wednesday, October 9th.

Claire, thank you for doing this episode with us. This is going to be an interesting conversation because inevitably, I suspect, it's going to end up being a little bit about us. We're both parents and we're talking about parenting. Yeah. How old are your kids? Mine are two and three. Mine are eight and twelve. I win. You're in a busier phase, that's for sure. Right. And by win, I mean my situation is a little more challenging, but just a little.

Just a little. Bigger kids, bigger problems is what they say. It becomes less physically demanding, but it's more mentally demanding. All right, maybe you win. So I want to start by asking you to describe what our Surgeon General just said about parents and parenting. Not a subject we tend to think of as a classic question of public health and the Surgeon General.

So the Surgeon General Vivek Murthy put out an advisory. These are rare warnings. Past ones have been for things like cigarettes or gun violence. And this time what he's saying is that today's parents are not OK.

They're too stressed, not the normal amount of stress. But what he's saying is that parenting has become so difficult that it's become an urgent public health crisis. Huh. Basically slapping a warning on the business of parenting. Right. And why exactly? I mean—

I'm sure he has a very good explanation, but just on its face, parenting's never been easy. It will never be easy. That's right. And he does say parenting has always been something that brings both joy and challenge at the same time. But what's really different now is that we have entered this new era of parenting. Social scientists call it intensive parenting.

Basically, what it means is that we spend a lot more time and money on our children than previous generations did. Intensive parenting was first described by a sociologist named Sharon Hayes, and this is how she said it. Child-centered, expert-guided, emotionally absorbing, labor-intensive, and financially expensive.

The basic idea of intensive parenting, which I've reported on now for many years as it's gotten even more intensive, is that kids need to be sort of constantly educated and enriched and engaged. Right. It feels like in layman's terms, intensive parenting is being all up in your kid's business and

And feeling like parenting is a 24-hour job where you're very invested in your children's social and intellectual growth in a very hands-on way.

That's right. And so that's like when you take a walk and you notice that the leaves are changing, you say to your child, look, the leaves are changing. Do you know what drives that? Do you know why that's happening? That means that when they're doing, you know, a game on the floor, that you are down with them. I feel like you've been like watching me secretly in my kitchen with this.

And I mean, of course, this is how children learn. Right. But it's really gotten to an extreme. The American Academy of Pediatrics, for example, says that when children watch TV, it should be co-viewed. The parent should be sitting with them, watching TV with them, hitting pause to talk about what's happening on TV, what they can learn from it. And I mean, I think a lot of parents.

have used TV as their chance to go in the room and cook dinner. So this idea that when we are with our kids, we need to be constantly engaged in teaching them. I want to ask you, Claire, if what you're describing, this concept of intensive parenting,

is widespread enough to be a public health crisis. I would imagine that what you're describing might be the province of certain parents who have the financial wherewithal and, in a sense, the luxury to parent in this intensive way, and therefore that it might not be a vast, widespread collective experience, and therefore perhaps not a nationwide public health issue.

So when this style of parenting started, it was certainly an upper middle class phenomenon. But a variety of research has shown that it has spread across the income spectrum, across racial groups, that this is now considered by parents the optimal way to parent your children. If you have less money, if you have a job that allows for less time at home, you obviously have less ability to carry it out, but you still feel the pressure. So in some ways, that's even more stressful.

Okay, so we're all basically intensive parenting now. And why? Why are we participating in this stressful, intensive, hands-on, never-ending form of parenting? So a lot of things began to change around the time that we began to do this.

One is that kids born in the early 80s, when you and I were both born, are the first generation of kids in America to have just as much of a chance of doing better than their parents financially as worse. Before, it was sort of a definition of the American dream that each generation did a little bit better financially.

And that is no longer a guarantee. So there's this anxiety that kids won't do well, that they will fall out of their class, that they need to really have the utmost education and enrichment in order to succeed as adults. One way that that started to show up was that college became a lot more competitive and much more necessary for achieving this middle class wage.

What the social scientists I talk to say is that our society has become so worried about the importance of a college degree, about this fear that your kids will grow up to be unsuccessful adults and not be able to support themselves. And how that filters down is that we feel this pressure to sort of be optimizing our kids all the time, optimizing their resumes, preparing them for college, preparing them for this future in a way that parents really didn't feel that stress before. So.

So intensive parenting should be viewed as a kind of striving parenting driven by economic insecurity, like a kind of guarantor of prosperity.

people hope, a better outcome for their children at a time when there are very few assurances that their children will do as well or better than them. That's fascinating. That's exactly it. And, you know, as norms change, you look around and you see other people doing it. And so even for parents who this might not be top of mind, it sort of just gets in the air that we breathe that our kids need to do all these things in order to succeed. You started, Claire, to hint at this idea that

Intensive parenting is a break from what came before it, and I think it would be useful to situate this new form of parenting that the Surgeon General has just identified as problematic in a larger history of how parents in this country have parented.

Right. So the way that we parent changes a lot over the decades. And in recent years, every change has increased the pressure on parents. If we go back to the 70s, that's when parent was still a noun. No one used it as a verb. It was something we were, not something we did. ♪

Parents, by and large, did adult things when their children just occupied themselves. So they were more likely to do things in the presence of children, but not with their children. Maybe they were playing tennis and their children were on the playground nearby or they were having drinks with their friends in the living room and their kids were in the other room playing alone.

You know, we hear a lot of older people talk about how different childhood is today. And what I always hear them say is we used to run around until the streetlights came on or we used to run around until our mom called us in for dinner. And there's some truth to that. At the same time, this is when the women's movement is really ramping up.

More and more women are going to college and entering the workforce. And so for the first time, parents are really having to grapple with what that means when both parents are working outside the home. There was a moment when people were really advocating for the government to step in and help families solve this problem through policies like subsidized child care or paid family leave.

Those things ultimately didn't happen. And that cemented an essential piece of the American attitude towards parenting, which is that it's an individual task. It's not a community one. It's not one that you can count on the government to help you with. So the government basically is saying to American families in this new era of two-parent working households, you're on your own.

That's right. But soon enough in the 80s, we enter a new phase of parenting that becomes much more hands-on and parenting becomes a verb, not just a noun. And this was also a time when parenting books just exploded. We started getting this idea that we needed to listen to experts.

that we couldn't trust our own intuition about parenting, that we needed to learn how to do this, that this was a job we did. And this, the 80s, is also when we got helicopter parenting. Basically what that meant was that children's physical safety became paramount. That's Jenny, but that's not Jenny's dad. If she gets into that car, you may be looking at Jenny for the last time.

This was the era when there were a few high-profile child abductions. Abductions have never actually been common in America. They weren't then, they aren't now, but there were these kids' faces on milk cartons. Last year, 50,000 children disappeared, many of them from nice, safe neighborhoods. It's okay. It's okay.

Right, this is the era where I grew up. So it's Eitan Patz being kidnapped in New York. It's Adam Walsh, whose dad would go on to create America's Most Wanted. This becomes very scary for people, even though, as you said, it's never that widespread. That's exactly right.

And so there was this idea that kids needed to be constantly watched and supervised, playing and running around in the street after school on your own. That was no longer safe. It's 10 p.m. Do you know where your children are? So if you watch TV in the 80s, you probably remember a famous PSA. Celebrities were filming it. It's 10 p.m. Do you know where your children are? Andy Warhol.

Cindy Lauper. This idea of physical safety spread to other things. Falling off your bike, falling out of a tree if an adult wasn't there. That was unsafe. There was this idea that parents sort of needed to be hovering over their kids, making sure that they were safe and that they were supervised.

But it is not yet at this point in the 80s really about the intellectual development and enrichment and the idea that you're always supposed to be teaching your children. It's more about you're always supposed to be protecting them. So how do we get to that final frontier of parenting where we began intensive parenting? Because so far we're just in this area of parenting.

parents stressed out by worries mostly about their kids' safety. So by the late 1990s, we're influenced by a lot of the things we've already discussed. There's rising economic anxiety. There's rising competition for college. There's still this lack of public policy to support parents. There's also something new.

Neuroscientists start to learn more about young children's brains and how parents and the way that they interact with their children can influence that. And parents really grasp onto this idea that every interaction they have with their child is shaping who they're ultimately going to become. We'll be right back.

Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about.

In a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast, too. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com slash bank. Capital One N.A. Member FDIC. Hey, I'm Tracy Mumford. You can join me every weekday morning for the headlines from The New York Times. Now we're about to see a spectacle that we've never seen before. It's a show that catches you up on the biggest news stories of the day. I'm here with

Square. We'll put you on the ground where news is unfolding. I just got back from a trip out to the front line and every soldier. And bring you the analysis and expertise you can only get from the Times newsroom. I just can't emphasize enough how extraordinary this moment is. Look for The Headlines wherever you get your podcasts. So Claire, tell us about the brain science that ends up driving or helping to drive this final era of parenting, intensive parenting that we're in now.

So neuroscientists really begin to focus on the fact that children's brains are moldable. For a long time, it was sort of just assumed that your kid was born with this temperament and the certain set of skills, and they would sort of turn out the way they were going to turn out. But neuroscience began to show us that the things that happen to us when we're young can have lifelong effects on our outcomes.

From birth to age three are the most important years in a child's brain development, the time that defines who they become. We talk about adverse childhood experiences when kids are exposed to trauma or severe stress, that that can cause problems later on. Did you know that the pathways in your infant's brain that deal with emotions are built and strengthened when you respond day after day to your baby's smiles by smiling back or picking him up?

We also learned that when kids are exposed to education and enrichment early on, that that can mold their brains in a certain way. Talk, laugh, sing, and play peekaboo often so that children hear you speak. We get this research about the number of words that kids hear before they're a certain age and how this can impact their vocabularies and reading comprehension later on.

This is when we got Baby Mozart, this idea that you would play classical music outside your belly when your baby was in utero because there was this science that suggested that this molded their brain in certain ways. You know at this moment in the episode, we have to play Baby Mozart. I'm excited to hear it. ♪

But some parents take this to an extreme with this idea that parental inputs entirely shape a child's outcomes and what they become. And what that does to parents is makes them feel like at every turn, at every moment, it's their responsibility to be shaping their children's future outcomes. And so fast forward a couple of decades and this kind of intensive parenting process

has only gotten more intensive and, according to America's top doctor, too intense for parents. Give us a little bit more of a sense of what that looks like. I mean, you mentioned at the beginning of our conversation the tendency to describe the leaf falling from the tree. But I really want to get kind of granular around this idea of what—

intensive parenting focused on the responsibility of a parent to shape early outcomes because those mean later outcomes actually looks and feels like.

So a statistic I think about all the time from my reporting on this is that working mothers today spend as much time with their children as stay-at-home mothers did in the 1970s. Wow. How is that possible? Well, one of the driving factors of intensive parenting is this feeling of guilt, especially maternal guilt for working outside the home.

And there's this feeling that as a result, when you're not working, you need to be spending all your time with your children. So today it's much, much more likely that your children are involved in your leisure time. They're involved in your exercise time. Which is to say it's no longer exercise time. They're no longer playing on the playground while you're playing tennis with your friends. They're instead playing tennis with you. Right. Time use data has shown that what this comes at the expense of is time.

parents sleep, parents doing things for their own health, and parents spending time alone with friends or their spouse. And that very much sounds like a more stressful form of parenting that the Surgeon General is talking about. I mean, when parents have so little time to themselves and therefore so little identity of their own outside of parenting and their work,

That is a less enjoyable form of parenting, period. That's right. And another thing the Surgeon General raised was social media and the sense of comparison. There have been a lot of surveys that say parents really feel judged by other parents.

So social media, because it's showing the victories in children's lives and it's showing these happy family moments, is really making people who see it feel less than, feel insecure, feel like they're not measuring up in this world in which they're already feeling like the way that they're parenting and juggling everything is not measuring up.

Right. Instagram, some people say, the great envy machine. That's right. And I don't know about you. Quick tip for parents who want to raise confident kids. But when I open Instagram now. OK, when you discipline your kids, keep it short and sweet. No long lectures. Don't tell them what I see. You know, not even accounts that I follow is a bunch of parenting advice.

This is a back-to-school hack you don't want to miss. It's like Dr. Becky. I make a menu for my kids the night before where they have to pick their breakfast options. Telling me how to parent. And so it's either seeing these happy families or seeing these experts telling me what I need to be doing differently. And it's sort of feeding this insecurity.

It's as simple as this. When you say we're all done with iPad after that one show, you are all done with iPad after that one show. Oh, yeah. There's a couple of them who are like everywhere and they're always in front of a microphone and they're always saying things that you're like, oh, it's totally not how I handle that. Yep, yep, exactly.

And so all these concerns and pressures have really added up. What the Surgeon General is talking about is potentially toxic stress. Clearly, major stressors like living through a war have immediate, serious impacts on people. But research also shows that sort of low-level, persistent chronic stress is

have really big effects on people's mental health. And it also puts parents at risk of more serious mental illness, like anxiety and depression. The Surgeon General cites data that shows that nearly half of parents say that most days they feel completely overwhelmed by the stress, numb, or even non-functional. And that's compared with only a quarter of people who aren't parents. Right. So I clearly, from what you're saying, understand this situation

stew of factors, economic, social, social media, that have conspired to make parenting the stressful experience it now is. And stressful to the point of, as you just said, depression, feeling numb,

But to be provocative for just a moment, I want to put all of that to the test. Is it possible, based especially on the brain science that you talked about earlier, that intensive parenting for all of the ways that it's bad for parents is good for most kids? So good, in fact, that it's still worth it.

So here's the thing. Nobody disputes that parents being engaged with their children, spending time with them, teaching them things is a bad thing. That is, of course, a good thing. But there is a backlash. You might have heard of the free range parenting movement. It's basically this idea that kids should still be able to run free until the streetlights come on.

These are parents who are actively resisting both the helicopter parenting and the intensive parenting. The problem with free-range parenting is that there are no other kids out in the street after school for their kids to run free with. Right. What's the point of a free-range kid if he has no other free-range kids to free-range with? It's quite hard to implement. There have been very valid concerns that this kind of parenting should

could be decreasing kids' independence and their resilience, their ability to solve problems on their own. What does the science say about that?

There has been science that connects kids' lack of independence today to some of the mental health crisis that we're seeing among kids. There's something to be said for kids being out there, getting into a conflict, being scared, having to solve a problem on their own that helps them understand that anxiety and stress are something that they can cope with and, you know, build that toolbox to cope with it. There is some truth to that.

However, most parents are not doing it to that extreme. They're not letting their kids solve no problems on their own. And I recently did a story that I thought was really fascinating because it was not the result I expected, which is that young adults who have been raised this way are still really close with their parents, closer than in previous generations.

They're talking to them more often. They're texting them. And both the parents and the kids are happy with this. They're just having, you know, a full adult relationship with their parents. And that is probably a good thing.

Right. That feels like a pretty healthy, desirable dynamic. However, if we inhabit the space of our Surgeon General and take at face value the idea that in this new era of parenting, parents are facing a kind of public health problem, I'm curious what the Surgeon General thinks are some of the solutions that might mitigate the parent problem of that equation.

Sure. So he proposed a lot of big structural solutions, things like public policies, paid family leave, subsidized child care at a time when child care has gotten so much more expensive. He talked about workplace changes, employers better helping parents manage the juggle and understand that their workers have lives outside of work.

He talked about changes in health care, health care providers being more aware of parents' mental health. And surely these things would all make big differences, provide relief for parents. They're also things that people have been working on for a long time. And, you know, it's slow going.

What I thought was really interesting is he also talked about cultural changes. And the reason we parent this way is because it's become our culture. That means that we could also change the culture. It sounds pie in the sky, changing the culture. It sounds very difficult for individual people to achieve. But he mentioned these really small things, like if you have a friend with a baby, go over for 15 minutes and offer to hold the baby while they take a shower or take a nap. He said,

Talked about the need for more community spaces, places like parks and libraries where families can get out of sort of the insular household and interact with other families, maybe to get some support watching their children, but also to talk about these things. He even said that parents should.

not feel guilt when they take time for themselves to exercise or take a nap or go out with friends. That's really important to do for their own health. And ultimately, if you're in better mental health, then that helps your children too. What does he say about how your spouse makes you feel when you take that nap though? Maybe you could trade off nap times and maybe at the end of the evening, you could also get a babysitter and go out with your spouse. Yeah.

Totally. Just asking questions here. All right. Well, I have to end this by asking about you. You have become a real authority on parenting at The Times. You brought us this reporting about intensive parenting and the Surgeon General's report. Are you yourself an intensive parent? I'm pretty much sure the answer is going to be yes. And to the degree that you are,

How stressed are you? How much are you reevaluating all of this? And are you contemplating any kind of corrective of any kind? Are you willing to start to free range a little bit? Well, of course I'm an intensive parent because it's hard not to be these days.

But I do take this to heart. I try to catch myself. There was this moment when my younger son was in kindergarten and I heard another parent talking about how her kindergartner had a tutor. And I was like, oh, my God, that hadn't occurred to me. Do I need a tutor? The same child was in rec soccer in kindergarten and went back in first grade and there were no more kids from his school on the soccer team. So, you know, I texted some of the parents and said, where are they?

They're like, we signed up for private club. It's time to do private club when they're seven years old. And I was like, oh, my God, do I need to do that? And I have caught myself and, you know, not done those things. Caught yourself and said, I don't need to give into this pressure. That's right. I don't need to give into this pressure. You know, I have had moments where I'm like, you know what? You go to the basement and watch TV for an hour. And I'm not going to feel guilty about this because I am parenting non-intensively right now.

So I do feel some sense of like you can let go of the guilt and embrace that a little bit. All right. Well, Claire, this has been extremely illuminating and I'm grateful for your time. Thank you very much. Thanks for having me. We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today. You're going to get out. Get out now.

Time will be running out very shortly if you wait any longer. On Tuesday, millions of Floridians evacuated their homes as Hurricane Milton approached the state's west coast. Forecasters are calling Milton the strongest storm to emerge from the Gulf of Mexico in 20 years.

During a series of news conferences, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis warned that the storm's lethal force would extend across the Florida peninsula.

and would likely flood communities that are still recovering from the state's last hurricane. A lot of the places on the west coast of Florida that did receive significant storm surge for Hurricane Helene is projected to have even more storm surge from Hurricane Milton. And the scandal-plagued administration of New York City Mayor Eric Adams is collapsing.

On Tuesday, his first deputy mayor resigned, becoming the seventh senior official to leave the mayor's office over the past few weeks. Adams himself is under growing pressure to resign after being indicted on federal corruption charges for allegedly accepting illegal campaign donations and gifts from the government of Turkey in return for political favors.

Today's episode was produced by Alex Stern and Shannon Lin, with help from Ricky Nowetzki and Sydney Harper. It was edited by Lexi Diao, contains original music by Marion Lozano, Pat McCusker, and Sophia Landman, and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landferg of Wonder League.

That's it for The Daily. I'm Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.