Singer wrote the book to raise awareness about the suffering of over 200 million turkeys raised in conditions close to torture, including mutilation and extreme confinement that causes pain. He believes Americans should know about these practices to potentially change them.
Singer acknowledges that while progress is slow and challenging, there have been advancements, such as better animal welfare legislation in the European Union and some U.S. states like California. He remains hopeful that continued public awareness can lead to improvements.
Effective altruism is the idea that one should strive to make the world a better place by focusing on the most effective ways to reduce suffering and increase happiness, considering global and even non-human impacts. It aligns with utilitarianism by prioritizing actions that maximize overall well-being with limited resources.
Singer argues that his views are formed after extensive discussions with medical professionals and parents of severely disabled children, who often face significant suffering. He believes that personal experiences, including his own family's history, inform his perspective on reducing unnecessary suffering.
Singer acknowledges the potential trade-off but emphasizes the importance of maintaining intellectual integrity as a philosopher. He believes that rigorously following arguments to their logical conclusions is crucial, even if it means addressing controversial topics that might alienate some audiences.
Singer admits that while he strives to follow utilitarian principles, there are limits to what he is willing to sacrifice, such as causing family disruption. He believes in doing much more good than most people without making extreme personal sacrifices that could lead to significant personal costs.
Singer defends the journal's mission to rigorously examine ideas that might be considered beyond the pale, arguing that even issues like blackface and zoophilia have nuances that deserve academic exploration. He believes that challenging societal norms through thoughtful debate is valuable.
Singer admits to feeling the emotional pull of retributive justice, such as supporting the death penalty for heinous crimes, despite his general opposition to it based on utilitarian principles. He acknowledges the conflict between his head and heart in such cases.
The controversial philosopher discusses societal taboos, Thanksgiving turkeys and whether anyone is doing enough to make the world a better place.Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.