cover of episode Ep. 1590 - Kamala Joins "Call Her Daddy" While Americans Call For Help

Ep. 1590 - Kamala Joins "Call Her Daddy" While Americans Call For Help

2024/10/8
logo of podcast The Michael Knowles Show

The Michael Knowles Show

Chapters

Kamala Harris's recent interview on 60 Minutes was met with criticism due to her seemingly inconsistent stances on various political issues. Her responses regarding fracking, immigration policies, and Medicare for All raised questions about her core beliefs and whether she is simply pandering to different audiences.
  • Critics point out Kamala Harris's shifting positions on key issues like fracking, immigration, and Medicare for All.
  • Harris defends her changing stances by emphasizing her role as vice president, her travels across the country, and her focus on building consensus.
  • This explanation raises concerns about her integrity and whether she holds any firm beliefs or simply tells people what they want to hear.

Shownotes Transcript

Kamala Harris suffers the worst week of her campaign as reporters start to actually ask her questions. Better late than never, I guess. The White House gets caught lying about wasting FEMA funds on migrants and the porn industry invests in the Harris campaign. Pimps for Kamala. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.

Welcome back to the show. There is a shocking new slate of evidence out that smoking pot all day is actually not good for you.

Turns out waking and baking and then stuffing your face with Doritos actually might have some negative health consequences. We will get to that shocking story in a moment. There's so much more to say. First, though, go to balanceofnature.com slash Knowles. Balance of Nature Fruits and Veggies is the most convenient way to get whole fruits and vegetables daily.

Nature is pretty good at giving us the ingredients we need through our fruits and vegetables. So balance of nature takes fruits and vegetables, they freeze dry them, turn them into a powder, and then put them into a capsule. You take your fruit and veggie capsules every day, and then your body knows what to do with them.

Balance of Nature is just one ingredient of a balanced lifestyle. It has no intention to replace a healthy diet, exercise, sleep, or any other healthy habits. It's intended to be used in concert with other healthy habits. Go check it out, especially when you're on the road. It's sometimes hard to eat well. People are eating a lot of fast food or whatever. That is one way to know, I can say with confidence, I love Balance of Nature.

In no small part because Balance of Nature guarantees you're getting those fruits and veggies. Go to balanceofnature.com. Use promo code Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer. Plus, you'll get a free bottle of fiber and spice. That is balanceofnature.com slash Knowles. Kamala Harris got absolutely destroyed.

by 60 minutes. Kamala has been sitting down for more and more interviews. This is evidence. I know Republicans want to be doomers and gloomers and say everything's lost and we need to take the black pill and Western civilization's done and billions are going to die. But the Harris campaign would not be desperately chasing interviews, would not be nearly as aggressive as it is right now if this thing were really in the bag for the Democrats. Kamala Harris is not good at speaking.

She lacks the one skill that is usually required of politicians. She does her politics a little bit more behind the scenes, and she's done a good job at it. She wound up becoming the vice president of the United States without ever really impressing any voters. But it means that now that her campaign is in a little bit of trouble and the race seems a little bit close, she's going out there. She's trying to get those few extra votes in the swing states. She is

It puts herself out with what she believes to be friendly media. And then shockingly, 60 minutes destroys her with simple questions. Let me tell you what your critics and the columnists say. Okay. They say that the reason so many voters don't know you is that you have changed your position on so many things. You were against fracking. Now you're for it. You supported looser immigration policies. Now you're tightening them up.

You were for Medicare for all. Now you're not. So many that people don't truly know what you believe or what you stand for. And I know you've heard that. In the last four years, I have been vice president of the United States. And I have been traveling our country. And I have been listening to folks.

and seeking what is possible in terms of common ground. I believe in building consensus. We are a diverse people, geographically, regionally, in terms of where we are in our backgrounds. And what the American people do want is that we have leaders who can build consensus, where we can figure out compromise and understand it's not a bad thing as long as you don't compromise your values.

to find common sense solutions. And that has been my approach. I can't imagine a worse answer to that question. Though Kamala Harris couldn't imagine the question being asked because she thought she was going on friendly media. This is 60 Minutes. This is network TV news. But the question was great kudos to, I guess, the one serious journalist over at CBS who says, hey,

You've changed your positions radically on like every big issue. So why should voters trust you? Aren't you just a liar? And what does she say? She goes, well, as vice president, I've traveled around a lot. You've traveled around a lot. That's why you just you don't believe in any of the things you campaigned on.

That's why you don't believe in anything you previously said you believed in? Well, no, no, you don't understand, 60 Minutes guy. You see, I listen to people.

Oh, so you have no beliefs of your own. You just pander to whichever audience you're speaking to. And now that you've met some larger number of people, you've decided that you're going to pander in this way on an issue rather than in that way on an issue. No, no, you don't understand 60 Minutes guy. I seek to build consensus. Okay, well, if building consensus means reversing all of your positions, then you're pretty either

We would say a pretty radical person, or we would say you don't have any actual beliefs. You don't have any actual integrity. And really, I guess we would say both of those things at the same time.

You are a radical person. You are inclined toward radical policies, but you want to build consensus. That is to say, you want to get elected. You want to convince you what you want to you want to be where people want you to be. And the people all reject your policies. So then because you have no integrity whatsoever, no courage of your convictions, you're just going to flip and tell people what they want to hear if they want to hear the opposite from what you're telling them.

Which means, yet again, people have no reason to trust you. Because there is no evidence that what you say on Monday, you will continue to say on Tuesday. In fact, you've just admitted that you don't have any firmly rooted beliefs. You just say whatever the people want you to say. Which shows you that the Democrat accusations against Trump are, in fact, confessions about themselves. They say that Trump is a populist demagogue.

That he's a threat to our sacred democracy because he's just a populist demagogue who says whatever the people want him to say. No, you, Kamala Harris, have just admitted that that is exactly who you are. It wasn't Kamala alone who got destroyed by 60 Minutes. Her running mate, Tim Walz, on actually exactly the same issue, had a similarly weak answer. In your debate with J.D. Vance, you said, I'm a knucklehead at times.

And I think you were referring to the time that you said that you were in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square unrest when you were not. Is that kind of misrepresentation...

Isn't that more than just being a knucklehead? I think folks know who I am, and I think they know the difference between someone expressing emotion, telling a story, getting a date wrong, rather than a pathological liar like Donald Trump. But I think it comes down to the question of whether...

Whether you can be trusted to tell the truth. Yeah, well, I can. I think I can. I will own up to being a knucklehead at times, but the folks closest to me know that I keep my word. I want to be totally clear. I'm a big, dumb, idiot knucklehead. I want to be totally clear. And what's funny, we're all laughing that Tim Walz is describing himself that way, but he's doing it as a defensive measure because what he's being accused of is just lying to you.

And that's different. Being a liar, being a fraud is much worse than being merely a knucklehead. You don't want to be a knucklehead either. You want to be an intelligent person with integrity, with wisdom, with good judgment. And Walsh is saying, okay, that is foreclosed to me. The people definitely don't believe that. But maybe I can say I'm just an oopsie daisy. I'm kind of a dummy sometimes. And then they won't realize that I'm a fraud and a liar and a deceiver. But

Kudos on Mr. Serious Journalist, the one guy at CBS, for saying, hold on, you said that you were in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square, I won't say riot, during the Tiananmen Square assault on people who opposed the communist regime. And you weren't. That was months separated from your trip. And he says, look, I think I just, look, I got a date wrong.

You didn't get a date wrong. You got a date and a location wrong about an extremely important historical event. You wouldn't have accidentally gotten that date wrong. You'd know if you were there or not. I think people know the difference between being kind of a knucklehead and being a liar. Yeah, is it? Would you describe it as being kind of a knucklehead or being a liar when you say that you conceived your child via IVF and you did not?

Seems to me that falls a little more in the liar category. Would you say it's being just a little bit of a knucklehead or a liar when you lie about your military rank? Would you say it's being just a little bit of a knucklehead or a liar when you say that you carried weapons into combat and you never did any such thing? You never deployed to a serious war zone at any point in your time in the military. And when you were about to deploy to a war zone, you got out.

Is that just, oh, I just, I kind of forgot. I forgot, I thought I was carrying weapons when I was in China fighting Mao Zedong during the communist revolution there before I went over and all fought in Korea. But then I realized I actually was just sitting in Minnesota the whole time. Oopsie daisy, I'm a big knucklehead. No, you're not, you're a liar. You're a pathological liar. And so he, Walls, and Kamala,

try to say Trump is such a pathological liar. Is he? I don't know. The guy's actually pretty consistent. I think the worst you can say about Trump when it comes to pathological lying is that maybe sometimes he overestimates his crowd sizes, I guess. Often he doesn't. Often he just has huge crowds because he holds very popular rallies. But I guess then you can say, oh, it's a little bit of an exaggeration or something. You're talking with hyperbole like a New Yorker. But the actual pathological lying is

is coming from the Democrats. I had a person, friend of mine, who absolutely hates Trump said, Michael, what do you make of the mendacity, the sheer mendacity, you know, these lies? I thought, I don't know. I mean, maybe sometimes Trump gets carried away with the crowd sizes, but he never tells you that, well, that he fought in combat when he didn't fight in combat, or that he was near Tiananmen Square when he wasn't near Tiananmen Square, or that he was this rank in the military when he was a lower rank in the military. I don't know. He doesn't

Doesn't do anything. I'm just talking about Tim Walz. The same kind of pathological lying applies to Kamala and Joe Biden. I don't know. Trump seems like an honest Abe compared to those two.

There's so much more to say. First though, go to donewithdebt.com. You did not vote for this recession, but you sure as heck are going to pay for it at the pump and the grocery store and with that growing stack of unpaid bills. If you're one of millions of Americans getting crushed with financial stress right now, the solution is donewithdebt.com. Unlike some of the other guys, Done With Debt has created new aggressive strategies designed to get you out of debt permanently without bankruptcy or loans.

Done With Debt stands between you and bill collectors. They negotiate with your creditors to write off balances, cut interest, and stop penalties. They have a plan to put more money in your pocket month one and every month until your debt is gone. Best news is that Done With Debt is accepting new clients right now, but you need to hurry because some of their debt strategies are time sensitive and you don't want to miss out. Let Done With Debt hit the debt reset button for you and make your money yours again. But again,

This is time sensitive, so you need to visit donewithdebt.com or call 1-888-322-1054 right now. Chat with one of their debt relief strategists for free. Go to donewithdebt.com. That is donewithdebt.com. So Kamala got destroyed. CBS destroyed Kamala. Then CBS destroyed Tim Walz. Then Kamala destroyed herself.

Kamala, in the wake of Hurricane Helene, now as Florida braces for yet another hurricane, Hurricane Milton, set to hit. Kamala Harris is whining to CNN that Ron DeSantis has not taken her call to coordinate disaster relief.

NBC is reporting Governor DeSantis is ignoring your calls on hurricanes, resources and help. How does that hurt the situation here? You know, moments of crisis, if nothing else, should really be the moment that anyone who calls themselves a leader says they're going to put politics aside.

put the people first. People are in desperate need of support right now and playing political games at this moment in these crisis situations. These are the height of emergency situations. It's just utterly irresponsible and it is selfish and it is about gamesmanship instead of doing the job that you took the nose to do, which is to put the people first. What does it mean for resources?

Okay, now when I first heard Kamala say this, I'm serious. I thought, oh, you know, okay, she's making a little bit of a point here. Because we know Governor DeSantis has done a great job in Florida, and he's shown exactly how to handle a cleanup and recovery in the wake of a hurricane. He's done a great job there. Tennessee has done a great job. North Carolina, which is run by a Democrat, actually has done a horrible job, a much, much worse job.

Uh, but still, no matter how good a job DeSantis has done, especially you got another hurricane bearing down. Why wouldn't governor DeSantis take Kamala Harris's phone call? I mean, isn't she right? When she says times like this, you really shouldn't be playing politics around disaster relief. And then, then the thought occurred to me as I was, I was giving Kamala the benefit of the doubt here. The thought occurred to me, wait a second. Kamala is not the president.

Kamala's pretending to be the president for the purposes of having the advantages of the incumbency as she runs for president, but she's not the president. Joe Biden's the president. Kamala Harris is not the head of FEMA, for instance. Hold on a second. Kamala Harris has absolutely no role in hurricane recovery. Why would DeSantis take her call?

And we've been laser focused on leveraging all resources available, including from the federal government. And I've been in touch with both FEMA and the president, as well as marshalling all our state agencies and working to support our local communities. And so for Kamala Harris to try to say that my sole focus on the people of Florida is somehow selfish.

is delusional. She has no role in this. In fact, she's been vice president for three and a half years. I've dealt with a number of storms under this administration. She has never contributed anything to any of these efforts. And so what I think is selfish is her trying to blunder into this

No. And here's the thing. She has no role. No, she has no role in this process. I'm in contact with the president of the United States. I'm in contact with FEMA director. I'm obviously managing all our state agencies. We're supporting all our local government. And I will say this.

I've had storms under both President Trump and President Biden, and I've worked well with both of them. She's the first one who's trying to politicize the storm, and she's doing that just because of her campaign.

100% absolutely right. So you get DeSantis out there saying, look, this isn't my first rodeo. I've dealt with storms before, not even just under this administration, but under the previous one. And I can work with them. And under this administration, Kamala Harris has never picked up the phone. She's never been involved. Now, all of a sudden she's involved. Why? She's the vice president. She's not the president. She's not the head of FEMA. Wow. Kamala attacking DeSantis for playing politics with the storm.

is a confession that that is exactly what she is doing. She is politicizing the story. This woman, every time you think she can't get any lower, she can't be any more absurd, she goes there. Now, speaking of FEMA,

DeSantis is playing nice with the White House as they're managing federal funds. And he's saying, oh, I've worked well with both of them. But FEMA is a complete disaster here. FEMA, the emergency management department under Joe Biden, has totally mismanaged funds, given funds away to foreign nationals, totally outside the purview of the department.

And now Mayorkas, who's ultimately in control of FEMA, comes out and says, yeah, we don't have any money. We need some more money. You got Congress. You got to give us money. We gave too much money away to the foreigners that we imported in to try to make it so that Republicans never win any elections again. So oopsie daisy, you know, I'm a knucklehead, but give us more money. The White House realizes this is a huge liability. So Karine Jean-Pierre has done something that

a press secretary really never should do. It's like the one thing a press secretary never should do.

She has outright lied. You never, I've worked as a press secretary on campaigns. You never want to outright lie to the press. Do you want to spin stories in a way that can be helpful to your side? Yeah, of course, that's part of the job. But you never want to lie to the press because it tarnishes not only your credibility as a spokesman, it tarnishes the whole credibility of the administration. Here is what Corinne Jean-Pierre said about FEMA giving

giving money to migrants in October of this year versus September two years ago. It's just categorically full. No, Biden did not take female relief money to use on migrants.

So FEMA regional administrators have been meeting with city officials on site to coordinate available federal support from FEMA and other federal agencies. Funding is also available through FEMA's emergency food and shelter program to eligible local governments and not for profit organizations upon request to support humanitarian relief for migrants. Wait, hold on, wait, what was that there at the end? September 2022,

FEMA money is available and is being used for migrants. October 2024, the same woman in the same position, FEMA money is not being used for migrants. That's a total lie.

Which is it? This is the upside to Karine Jean-Pierre being unfireable and being bad at her job. But she's bad at her job. So when the really important stuff comes up, they drag John Kirby out, who is the spokesman for the National Security Council, to come out and try to try to manage the White House communication strategy. But they can't fire Karine Jean-Pierre because she just checks too many boxes. It would be one thing if she were merely a woman.

Maybe she could be fired. If she were merely black, she could just be fired. Maybe, maybe. If she were merely a lesbian, she could, maybe they could fire her. But she has all of these things. She is totally uncancellable. She is totally unfireable. And so we can see clips, not just of the White House spokesman contradicting that office two years away. It's the same woman, same woman, same job, same administration lying.

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris's administration has given your federal emergency management money away to foreign nationals that you don't want here, that don't belong here, that they imported because they want to give Democrats a permanent electoral majority. And they gave all your tax money away, money that was supposed to be used for you. If you ever found yourself absolutely devastated, as so many people have been by this storm and who we hope not, God forbid, but might be by the storm that's coming.

They gave that money away and now they're lying to you about it. There's so much more to say. First though, go to preborn.com slash Knowles. The left is zealous for the blood of babies going as far as supporting free abortions at the DNC. Kamala's extreme radical stance for abortion is clear in her running mate. As First Things reported, quote, Tim Walsh supports the right to infanticide. And

Infanticide is the taking of a baby's life after birth. I suppose it would also refer to it before birth, but specifically after birth, that's what they're supporting. It's insane. The media have dubbed this the abortion election. We've got to stand up to this evil. When you join forces with Preborn, the largest pro-life organization in the country, you're protecting the greatest victims in our society, babies in their mother's womb. Preborn's network of clinics,

is positioned in the highest abortion areas in the country. They've rescued over 300,000 babies. When a woman considering abortion searches to end her baby's life, pre-born is there. The power of the ultrasound combined with God's love doubles a baby's chance at life. One ultrasound is just $28. Five ultrasounds are $140. Right now, to donate securely, dial pound 250, say baby.

That is pound 250, keyword baby, or you can go to preborn.com slash Knowles, preborn.com slash Knowles. All right, back to Kamala. The only thing Kamala can do as things are going so poorly for her campaign this week is to go on extremely friendly media. So you would think 60 Minutes CBS is pretty friendly media for Democrats. No, apparently not. Apparently they got to go on even friendlier, even softer media. So

Kamala decided to go on the Call Her Daddy podcast. And the only thing that Kamala can talk about, it's not even the issues that a presidential candidate should be able to talk about, the economy, migration, foreign policy, because on every significant issue, the Biden-Harris administration has failed and is underwater in the minds of voters. Hasn't just failed objectively, but has failed to persuade the voters they need to persuade that they've done a good job. So the one issue that the Democrats are running on

is abortion. Because though they have failed on abortion in as much as they've encouraged the killing of a million babies or more per year in the United States, they've tried to make it easier to kill babies. The issue of abortion is one that for voters who like the idea of killing babies, or at least like the license to kill babies, you can't fail.

on that issue. As long as you tell people to kill more babies, you've succeeded. That's how you pass the test. It's not as hard as, say, growing the economy or managing migration or keeping world order together in foreign affairs. And the Biden-Harris administration, say what you will about them, they have made it easier to kill babies. They have encouraged people to kill babies. And some of their voters really like that fact. So Kamala goes on

Call her daddy and brags about being the first sitting vice president ever to visit a baby killing site. I have seen girls on the street walk up to men and be like, do you know where a tampon goes? Do you know how many tampons we use? Do you even know how like, do you know what a X or Y or Z is of a part of our, and they don't know the answer. I was the first vice president or president to ever visit

in office go to a reproductive health care clinic ever. Really? Yes, yes, yes. I didn't know that, but I guess that makes sense. To your point. Wow, she's the first sitting vice president ever go to a reproductive health care clinic. Hold on, what does she mean by a reproductive health care clinic? Does she mean she's the first sitting vice president ever to visit an obstetrician? I guess that's true. She's the first woman vice president. So I guess that's, but is that really what she's saying? For instance,

Would you say she's the first sitting vice president ever to visit a clinic at which obstetricians work, at which people provide women's reproductive health care? No, certainly not. Every single vice president's gone to one of those. They've gone to doctor's offices. They've gone to hospitals. So what does she mean? Does she mean specifically that she's the first sitting vice president to go to a pregnancy center? Well, she hasn't gone to a pregnancy center. Her administration is trying to shut down pro-life pregnancy centers. She's saying,

That she's the first sitting vice president to visit the killing site for little babies, an abortion mill. And that is true. She is the first sitting vice president to do that. There's a reason previous vice presidents haven't done that because it's generally been considered unbecoming for politicians to go and rejoice in the blood of innocent babies who are being sacrificed on the altar to demons.

and the false gods of liberal modernity, such as career and individualism and money. Yeah, not to put it too bluntly, but yeah, that's why previous vice presidents haven't done that, because it's considered disgraceful. And Kamala Harris knows it's disgraceful. That's why she has to use that euphemism. I'm the first sitting vice president who's ever visited a reproductive health care facility. It's the opposite of reproduction. It's the opposite of health. It's the opposite of care. It is a facility, I guess.

They use the euphemism because they know that the reality is hideous and horrifying. Then she has the audacity to try to correct Trump on his claims about abortion. In the debate, former President Trump claimed that some states are executing babies after birth. Can you just clarify? That is not happening anywhere in the United States.

It is not happening. And it's a lie. Just it's a bold faced lie. Can you imagine? He's suggesting that women in their ninth month of pregnancy are electing to have an abortion. Are you kidding? That is that is so outrageously inaccurate. And it's so insulting.

to suggest that that would be happening and that women would be doing that. It's not happening anywhere. This guy is full of lies. I mean, I just have to be very candid with you. Okay, so...

It is happening. It's happening in multiple states run by Democrats. It's happening in the state currently run by her running mate, Tim Walz. It is happening because Tim Walz passed a law explicitly removing protections for babies who are born alive and survive abortion, removing the requirement that physicians provide them medical care, and removing the requirement that they're having been born alive and then left to die be reported.

So even though Tim Walz passed that law, which, by the way, if this weren't happening, then the first question you would ask is, if it's not happening, if no one ever has a late-term abortion, why did your running mate pass a law protecting people and actually doctors, abortionists specifically, from having to provide medical care or to report the thing that never happens?

If it's not happening, why would you pass a special law to expand the license to do the things at the time when the thing never happens? Why would you do that? If this is never happening, if women are never having abortions at the end of their term, why would New York change its abortion law explicitly to permit abortions up until the moment of birth? If it's never going to happen, that seems like a big waste of time, doesn't it? Why would New York change the penal code to say that if a murderer...

murders a woman who is pregnant, it's no longer a double homicide. It's a single homicide. Why would New York change the... Why would... That seems like a big waste of time. Why would New York then celebrate by lighting Freedom Tower up pink? This were never happening. We're gonna have no political effect. This is just like when Nancy Pelosi said...

She opposed Trump's wall because walls don't work and walls are really cruel. If walls don't work, they're not cruel because they have no effect in the world. If walls are cruel, then they obviously work because they keep the foreigners out, which it can't be both simultaneously. But the question then, which Kamala won't be asked, but it's the question that gives away her lies here that you would want to ask her is, okay,

You say women never have late term abortions. It does not happen. It does not happen in America. It's a lie that late term abortions happen. Okay, so let's ban them. You should be fine with that, right? Because that'll have no political effect. It won't stop any woman from having any abortion that you say is not happening. See if she says she would do it. She would not do that. Kamala Harris supports zero restrictions on abortion. Tim Walz supports zero restrictions on abortion.

Seems like they're expending a lot of energy and a lot of work and a lot of political capital for a thing that isn't happening. But it is happening. They know it's happening. That's why they're not only defending laws, but actually crafting laws that will expand late-term abortion. So final point on this silly podcast that I've unfortunately now had to listen to two clips of for the first time ever. Still on the abortion point, which is in Kamala Harris's mind the only winner for her. Kamala Harris contemplates

whether any man has ever had to put up with a law that regulates his body. I want to pose this question more to you and the Daddy Gang, but one of the biggest conversations in this year's election revolves around a woman's body. Yep. I want to take a moment and can we try to think of any law

that gives the government the power to make a decision. I know what you're gonna ask. About a man's body. No. Is there any law? No. No. No. I know what you're gonna ask. Is there any law?

that regulates what a man can do with his body. Boom, gotcha, owned pro-lifers. Now just put aside for a moment that laws to protect babies in the womb are not primarily about the woman's body. They're about the baby's body inside the womb. But just put that aside for a second. Are there any laws that regulate men's bodies? No, I guess other than drug laws,

Right. Those are laws that regulate what a man can do with his body. Drug law. Okay. Drug laws or drunk driving laws or seatbelt laws that regulates what you can do with your bodies or public indecency laws that regulates how you can present your bodies in public, what clothes you got to wear and

Other than, I guess, some property lines that regulates where you can move your body. You can't trespass into property that isn't yours. And other than, I guess, bathroom regulations. Until recently, it used to be men couldn't go into the women's bathroom. Now, actually, because of Democrats, they can. So, that one, I guess...

men have expanded what they can do with their bodies. And, oh, the draft, I guess that's a regulation that pertains to men's bodies because you can just take men with their bodies and their souls and then drag them off to war and throw them in with a rifle and denang and tell them good luck. It kind of sounds like there's a lot of laws that regulate men's bodies and women's bodies. And, well, because any law

is going to regulate your body to some degree or other. Some, it's rather indirect, like tax laws, which have an effect on how you engage in labor, which has a relation to your body. Some laws are a little more direct, like drug laws or the draft. Okay, that really explicitly, directly regulates how you use your body. But human beings are body and soul, so any law is going to regulate your body to some degree because that's how we do things in time and space.

So yeah, other than that, over the past two years, DailyWire Plus has collaborated with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on a collection of shows to help you win at life. The Mastering Life Collection with Jordan B. Peterson. Mastering life topics range from marriage to masculinity and managing mental health. That is alliterative. With Jordan B. Peterson's newest series, Depression and Anxiety.

Plus, coming this fall, Jordan Peterson has two new Mastering Life series out, one on negotiation and one on success. Become a Daily Wire Plus member for unlimited access to Jordan B. Peterson's incredible Mastering Life collection today at dailywire.com slash subscribe. Use code Jordan at checkout for 35% off your new annual memberships. That is dailywire.com slash subscribe. My favorite comment yesterday is from Crystal Abel.

eight, nine, seven, six, who says, unless being paid ridiculous sums, I have no idea on earth why anyone is still on the fence. Trump 2024. I get it. I get why people would support Kamala.

People would support Kamala if they have disordered appetites and defective reason. I don't even mean that as like a dunk own insult. I mean, that's plenty of people. We all have certain defects and in our desires and in our minds and intellects. And some people have it more than others. So if you have this appetite, if you have this bloodlust to kill babies,

and that really matters to you, then you're going to vote for Kamala. And you don't care if the economy is terrible and you can't afford eggs or milk or whatever. You're going to vote for her. If you hate America and you don't want America to have a country anymore, and you don't want us to have a border and you want to flood the country with foreigners in a process controlled by criminal cartels, then you're going to vote for Kamala.

because she's going to give you that. She's going to give you that open border. So I get it. It's not necessarily all cynicism. Some people have just really perverse wills and minds. Now, speaking of dudes, speaking of men's issues, it occurred to me recently that the white dudes for Kamala

looks a little different than the campaign presented that group. The campaign presented that group as a bunch of just really nice guys like Pete Buttigieg, just really kind of nice, happy looking, liberal, open-minded, progressive fellows. But then I was thinking about the white dudes for Kamala. You remember that the longshoreman kind of mobster looking guy, that boss who talks like the love child of Tony Soprano and Archie Bunker?

Well, that guy, his union endorsed Kamala, the guy who talks like this, like, yeah, I'm going to cripple your whole country. You see, until you're going to give me my money that I'm going to go over there to the five families in New York. I'm going to get the Columbo's and the Genovese to come down and shake you down. If you don't give me my money, vote for Kamala. Yeah. You see trans rights and human rights or whatever. Yeah. From the river to the sea, Jordan will be free. It'll be Babu. Give me my money. Vote for Kamala.

Wow, that's not the kind of white dude for Kamala that I would have expected. Then you think Doug Emhoff, the man redefining masculinity. He's not a toxic male, you know. Doug Emhoff is why he's a new modern progressive male.

until we find out, this is all public, we're not revealing private sins, that he cheated on his wife with the nanny, then impregnated the nanny, then the nanny didn't have a kid, and we're only left to wonder how that happened. And then he also apparently is being accused of beating his girlfriend in public, but he's a new kind of man. Okay, so you've got accused women beaters and womanizers. You've got a mobster

allegedly. I got to say allegedly. You've got then, who was the other white dude for Kamala? Oh, Dick Cheney, the man referred to as Darth Vader for 20 years in American politics. And then who was he? Oh, Vladimir Putin, right. Vladimir Putin endorsed Kamala. So, oh man, you're known by the company you keep. This would appear to me to be a sign of realignment.

Now, you could say it's just really bad optics, but I think it goes deeper than that. I think this is a sign of political realignment. And OK, maybe Vladimir Putin, maybe he's being cagey and he's making jokes. Although I'm sure Vladimir Putin would rather deal with Kamala than with Trump. Trump's the only president on whose watch Vladimir Putin did not further invade a country in the past 20 years, more than 20 years of presidential administrations. He did it with George W. Bush. He did it with Obama. He didn't do it with Trump. He did it with Biden. He'll do it with Kamala.

So really, I mean, he might be joking about his support for Kamala, but I'm sure he would much rather deal with Kamala. And then Dick Cheney, why does Dick Cheney support Kamala? Well, because Kamala is a defender of the liberal establishment, the American liberal empire. And also because Dick Cheney supports his daughter, which I kind of respect. And his daughter now, being belligerent and establishment and anti-Trump, hates Trump and supports Kamala. What about Doug Emhoff?

What about the Doug Amoffs of the world? The guys who are kind of a little bit dodgy and they do, they kind of do some weird sex stuff and they're selfish in their relationships and their view of marriage. And those guys all support the left. The guys who don't take marriage seriously, who don't take their vows seriously, who view sex merely as a matter of pleasure. And those guys, they're libs. And then the mobster. I mean, he just, he explicitly endorsed Kamala.

sorry, the alleged mobster explicitly endorsed Kamala because the Democrats give them all sorts of kickbacks. Now, state of the country, it's very dangerous. If you're listening to this show right now, you might be hearing vaguely in the background sirens. That's because I'm in San Francisco right now. So there is no place in this entire city where there aren't sirens blaring at least 23 hours a day. But you're going to hear a lot more sirens if Kamala gets elected.

Think of the supporters. You got, okay, you got some figures who are now considered to be quite disreputable. And then on top of that, the porn industry has decided to get into the race onto the side of Kamala. 17 pornographic film actors yesterday announced they'd launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites, warning that Project... This sounds like a bit out of the Babylon Bee or the Onion or SNL or something. It's not...

They launched this campaign worrying that Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's plan for the next administration and personnel database, wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. And they're going to run these ads in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada. And the campaign is called the Hands Off My Porn campaign. And they're worried that young men support Trump. Relatively few young men support Kamala Harris.

It's Trump. So they're thinking, okay, well, young men are the demographic that use porn the most. So let's just get them to throw out all of their care about the economy and migration and foreign policy and babies and like all that stuff. And let's just get them to vote explicitly on their ability to abuse themselves while watching women who are frequently trafficked and abused

themselves, commit all sorts of degrading acts so that the men, while watching the demon sex fairies on the screen, can commit even further still degrading acts. And then we'll have a great country, I guess. I don't know. The most disreputable people in the world support Kamala Harris. Mobsters, alleged mobsters, and war profiteers, and baby murderers, and pimps. They support

Kamala Harris and apparently domestic abusers if the headlines are to be believed. So the porn industry says Project 2025, whatever that, the thing that Trump disavowed, but the thing that is also a good thing in its own right, which is about staffing a future conservative administration,

Project 2025, by which people just mean like conservatives. Conservatives think that we should ban porn. Okay, well look, I think it'd be great to ban porn. I think it'd be great to imprison pornographers. We did that until pretty recently, back at the end of the George W. Bush administration, right before Barack Obama took office, the federal government imprisoned a pornographer for obscenity. Okay, so this isn't even like you're resurrecting some 50 or 60 year old policy. They did it right before Obama got into office. And I think that would be a good thing to do.

But that isn't even what's really being proposed right now. What the porn people are really concerned about is that certain states are passing age verification laws. So they're saying, look, if you want to degrade yourself and look at other people degrading themselves and do all sorts of weird sex stuff alone in this really humiliating way, fine, you can do that. But we just don't want little kids to do that.

And the porn industry says, whoa, whoa, whoa there, you Puritans, hold on. And then the porn industry says, we're not going to do business in states that have age verification laws. And in fairness to the porn industry, not that I think we have to be all that fair to them, but what they say is, no, it's not. We don't want to present porn to kids, but we also don't want people to have to show an ID to watch pornography.

You got to show an ID to buy a pack of cigarettes. You got to show an ID to buy a tin of Zin. You got to show an ID to get a Playboy at the local magazine shop. But for some reason, watching extremely hardcore, gross porn, you don't need to show an ID. I don't know. It doesn't make a lot of sense. This is, whoa, we don't want people to show IDs because then even the adults will be less inclined to watch it because they'll be embarrassed because they'll be ashamed. Right. Why?

Because your product is a shameful thing that exploits human beings at every step of the way and degrades every single person involved. Yeah, that's one of the reasons the conservatives think that and that everyone until pretty recently thought that we should minimize it. But right now, specifically, we're just trying to make sure that kids who are first exposed to porn at the age of 10 or below are

on average, don't get all these sexual hangups because they're exposed to it so young. And you won't even let us do that. But you're supporting Kamala, of course, because all the most disreputable people in the world are doing that. Okay, there's a story we didn't get to today. It's a really shocking and important story. We're gonna have to wait and get to it tomorrow, I think. That it turns out that if you just smoke a ton of pot all day, every single day, that is not good for your health. Some people are gonna hear that. They're gonna say, okay, well, what's the big story? But man, I got, I know people

All right. I know people who will yell at you if you ever suggest that maybe it's not good to the first thing you do when your eyes are pried open in the morning is to just rip some fat bong and puff the devil's lettuce all day. That might have negative health effects. We'll get to all of that, I guess, tomorrow.

Because today is Trans Tuesday. The Membrum Segmentum begins now. I guess that's very fitting for my being in San Francisco to have a Trans Tuesday. Become a member. Use code NOLSKNWLAS at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.