Robots and smart technologies are expected to automate many jobs, but also create new collaborative roles that could revitalize work processes.
The Task Force believes the U.S. will continue to generate many low-wage jobs, which could be beneficial if they compete for workers, preventing a decline in job quality.
The pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine robots to minimize face-to-face contact and reduce COVID transmission risks in nursing homes.
Andrus on Hudson is an outlier because it uses robots for telemedicine and social interaction, which are not commonly utilized in other nursing facilities.
Japan's aging population and declining working-age population have led to increased demand for long-term care and a shortage of workers, driving the adoption of robots to assist with caregiving tasks.
The study found that cobot adoption was associated with more care workers, particularly non-regular, flexible workers, and reduced the burden on regular nurses, potentially improving job satisfaction.
The U.S. lags due to fragmented regulatory authorities, payment issues, and a lack of pilot studies involving robotics in healthcare settings.
Robots can enhance quality of care, reduce employee turnover by alleviating back-pain inducing tasks, and allow care workers to focus more on compassionate care.
It’s true that robots (and other smart technologies) will kill many jobs. It may also be true that newer collaborative robots (“cobots”) will totally reinvigorate how work gets done. That, at least, is what the economists are telling us. Should we believe them?
SOURCES:
David Autor), professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
James Rosenman), C.E.O. of Andrus on Hudson senior care community.
Karen Eggleston), economist at Stanford University.
Yong Suk Lee), professor of technology, economy, and global affairs at the University of Notre Dame.
RESOURCES:
"Robots and Labor in Nursing Homes)," by Yong Suk Lee, Toshiaki Iizuka, and Karen Eggleston (*NBER Working Paper, *2024).
"Global Robotics Race: Korea, Singapore and Germany in the Lead)," by International Federation of Robotics (2024).
"Unmet Need for Equipment to Help With Bathing and Toileting Among Older US Adults)," by Kenneth Lam, Ying Shi, John Boscardin, and Kenneth E. Covinsky (*JAMA Internal Medicine, *2021).
"Robots and Labor in the Service Sector: Evidence from Nursing Homes,)" by Karen Eggleston, Yong Suk Lee, and Toshiaki Iizuka *(NBER Working Papers, *2021).
The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines), by David Autor, David Mindell, Elisabeth Reynolds, and the MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future (2020).
"Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets)," by Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo (University of Chicago Press, 2020).
"The Slowdown in Productivity Growth and Policies That Can Restore It)," by Emily Moss, Ryan Nunn, and Jay Shambaugh (The Hamilton Project, 2020).
"The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade,)" by David H. Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson (*NBER Working Papers, *2016).
"Deregulation at Heart of Japan's New Robotics Revolution)," by Sophie Knight and Kaori Kaneko (*Reuters, *2014).
EXTRAS:
"What Do People Do All Day?)" by *Freakonomics Radio *(2024).
"Did China Eat America’s Jobs?)" by Freakonomics Radio (2017).