Chapters
Shownotes Transcript
Probably not — the incentives are too strong. Scholarly publishing is a $28 billion global industry, with misconduct at every level. But a few reformers are gaining ground. (Part 2 of 2)
SOURCES:
Max Bazerman), professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
Leif Nelson), professor of business administration at the University of California, Berkeley Haas School of Business.
Brian Nosek), professor of psychology at the University of Virginia and executive director at the Center for Open Science.
Ivan Oransky), distinguished journalist-in-residence at New York University, editor-in-chief of The Transmitter, and co-founder of Retraction Watch.
Joseph Simmons), professor of applied statistics and operations, information, and decisions at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Uri Simonsohn), professor of behavioral science at Esade Business School.
Simine Vazire), professor of psychology at the University of Melbourne and editor-in-chief of Psychological Science.
RESOURCES:
"The Harvard Professor and the Bloggers)," by Noam Scheiber (*The New York Times, *2023).
"They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie?)" by Gideon Lewis-Kraus (*The New Yorker, *2023).
"Evolving Patterns of Extremely Productive Publishing Behavior Across Science)," by John P.A. Ioannidis, Thomas A. Collins, and Jeroen Baas (*bioRxiv, *2023).
"Hindawi Reveals Process for Retracting More Than 8,000 Paper Mill Articles)," (*Retraction Watch, *2023).
"Exclusive: Russian Site Says It Has Brokered Authorships for More Than 10,000 Researchers)," (*Retraction Watch, *2019).
"How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data)," by Daniele Fanelli (*PLOS One, *2009).
EXTRAS:
"Why Is There So Much Fraud in Academia?)" by *Freakonomics Radio *(2024).
"Freakonomics Goes to College, Part 1)," by *Freakonomics Radio *(2012).
