Best of the Program | Guests: Brendan Carr & Justin Haskins | 9/24/24
48:00 Share

Church's original recipe is back. You can never go wrong with original. Still tastes the same like back in the day. Right now get two pieces of chicken starting at only $2.99 or 10 pieces starting at only $10.99. Church's. Offer valid at participating locations. Hey, on today's podcast, how do you talk to your friends who don't seem to listen to reason at all? They are the ones engulfed in the democratic cult.

I know that sounds controversial, but I think you will understand and believe like I do. This is a cult. So how do you talk to your friends? All that plus Brendan Carr from the FCC. Hey, George Soros, they just dropped all the laws, rules and regulations so he could take a bunch of foreign money and buy 200 radio stations in America.

And Justin Haskins is here to tell us all about the UN and what happened over the weekend. Global government coming your way. It's the best of the Glenn Beck podcast. And we begin in a minute. Let me tell you about Relief Factor.

If you know a thing or two about pain, listen up. For years, I woke up pretty much every day feeling like there was an elephant that had been tap dancing on my hands all night. I tried all things, everything I could to stop the pain. It would not stop. Thank goodness my wife, who is just the greatest wife. I know you have a wife and she's great and everything, but...

Tanya's the best. Anyway, I might have been threatened that she wouldn't listen to me anymore if I didn't try Relief Factor. So I tried it.

To her credit, it worked and I got my life back. Relief Factor is a daily supplement that helps your body fight pain by fighting inflammation, which is the source of most of the pain in our bodies and a lot of disease as well. 100% drug-free, it was developed by doctors to help reduce or eliminate pain, and over a million people have tried Relief Factor's Quick Start Kit.

70% of them have gone on to order it again and again. So stop masking your pain and start fighting back naturally. Give Relief Factor a try. Right now, their three-week quick start is only $19.95. It's less than a dollar a day. So visit relieffactor.com, relieffactor.com, or call 1-800-THE-NUMBER-4-RELIEF. 800-THE-NUMBER-4-RELIEF. ♪♪

You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck Program. There's a lot I want to talk to you today. I just said a couple of minutes ago before we went on the national broadcast that there are some things that I have had on my mind for 20 years, some things that I hoped that I would never have to say to you. But today just very well may be that day.

There's some really important things that are happening around the world. For instance, the UN is voting in all of these really draconian laws this week. And we're going to get into that next hour. It is the formation of one global government. And we're all for it. Did you know that? That's happening right now. Today. We'll talk about it coming up in just a second.

We're not talking to each other. You know, I think every day of my friends and some of my family members who are living in a dream. They just, they hate Donald Trump so much, they just can't get past it. And they think that, you know, I'm delusional. I know you have this in your family. You got to remember, in my family, you know, I'm the stinky brother. I was the youngest. So, you know, what does Glenn know?

Nobody in my family is impressed by me, so it's a good thing, too. It keeps you humble. But it's hard. It's hard because I know what I know. How do you talk to people? Why can't they see the things that you see? How come they can't see this isn't about Donald Trump? It's not about Donald Trump. It is truly about freedom. But they are being told that Donald Trump is the biggest obstacle, right?

The biggest danger to freedom in the republic. And I think in some ways, COVID-19 broke us. I mean, this has been happening for a while, but COVID-19 broke us. People who were once reasonable began to call for the banishment of the unvaccinated from civil society.

It was truly remarkable what happened to us. People were saying we should be sent to jail if you didn't get vaccinated. Some people said we shouldn't get medical care. Doctors, nurses said they wouldn't treat people. You let people with cancer die. Death was divided by vaccine status and treated accordingly. Information was censored, quote, for our own good.

Anyone who questioned the leader or fell out of line was deemed as dangerous or literally accused of killing people. Stephen Hassan developed the BITE, B-I-T-E model by, among other things, studying the brainwashing that happened in Maoist China. BITE, B-I-T-E, stands for Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional Control. BITE.

And it identifies the patterns used by cults or communists to manipulate their members. This is the same things that the Germans did, the Nazis did. Now, there are 50 attributes to watch for. But I want you to listen to this.

I don't know if I'm going to have time to go through all 50, but I'm going to hit many of them quickly. But I want you to listen to this and compare them to your experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and right now. Here's what a cult does to its people to indoctrinate them. Dictate where, how, and with whom the member lives and associates or isolates from.

Financial exploitation, manipulation, or dependence. Restrict leisure, entertainment, and vacation time. Permission is required for major decisions. Does any of this sound like COVID-19? Rewards and punishments are used to modify behaviors, both positive and negative. You can go to work if you're

If you haven't had the vaccine, discourage individualism, encourage group think, impose rigid rules and regulations, instill dependency and obedience, deliberately withhold information, distort information to make it more acceptable, systematically lie. Number 12, minimize or discourage access to non-cult sources of information, discourage

Don't do your own homework. God forbid you're not doing your own homework, are you? Internet, TV, radio, books, articles, newspapers, magazines, media, all critical information. Don't talk to anybody who disagrees with what the leadership says. And keep people so busy they don't have time to think or investigate. And control through cell phone with texting, calls, internet tracking.

In a cult, information is tightly controlled. Members are discouraged or forbidden from doing homework outside of the cult. Critical thinking and questioning are not just discouraged, they're seen as signs of betrayal. Sound familiar? Encourage spying on other members.

Extensive use of cult-generated information and propaganda, including newsletters, magazines, journals, audiotapes, videotapes, YouTube, movies, and other media, require members to internalize the group's doctrine as truth. Think, if you're not an anti-racist, you are a racist, and come to this program that we're now having in your office and internalize it. Say it.

Live it. Say it. Preach it. Instill black and white thinking. Decide between good and evil and organize people into us versus them. The use of loaded language and cliches that constrict knowledge, stop critical thoughts, and reduce complexities into buzzwords. Follow the science. He's a existential threat to our democracy.

Rejection of rational analysis, critical thinking, and constructive criticism. Forbid critical questions about the leadership, doctrine, or policy. Labeling alternative belief systems as illegitimate, evil, destructive, or not useful. Make the person feel that the problems are always their own fault, never the fault of the leaders or the group. You just don't understand inflation.

You're part of this racist system. Promote feelings of guilt or unworthiness, such as identity guilt. You're a white man. You're not doing enough to save the planet. Your family is really the problem.

Your past is suspect. Your affiliations are unwise. Your thoughts, your feelings, your actions are irrelevant or selfish. They pile on social guilt and historic guilt. This is not about... I didn't write this. Historical guilt? Fear, shame, and guilt are very powerful tools. Members are often told that leaving the group will result in catastrophic consequences.

either in this life or the next. Now let me ask you, catastrophic consequences, you mean like everyone will die because of global warming if you don't step up and shout down everyone who's questioning? Those people should be put in jail. We don't have time to debate it. Shunning all those who leave, giving a fear of being rejected by friends and family if you leave. Tulsi, RFK Jr.,

Roseanne. Who else? Who else has left and they've been completely shunned? I'll tell you who else. Everyone else who has woken up. Everyone else. They all say, my gosh, I lost all of my friends. Phobia. Indoctrination. Inculcating irrational fears about leaving the group or questioning the leader's authority. That's not even, that's not the whole list, by the way.

Does it seem like maybe we're witnessing this kind of stuff? The anti-racist stuff. I can never be forgiven for that. No. The moment you say you're not a racist, it's taken as a proclamation of guilt. And the cycle just begins over again. Being an anti-racist, it never stops. It never, ever stops.

It is really quite brilliant. You know, you want to know which one is building a cult. Let me ask you, which one has hired all of the best behavioral scientists to help them form all of their policies? It's not Donald Trump. Why would you hire a behavioral scientist? Well, behavioral scientists are really a modern version of propagandists.

How can I get you to do something without you knowing I'm trying to get you to do something? How can I play things off each other? It is manipulation. All of the best behavioral scientists are all working for the administration and the Democratic Party. It's all manipulation. So what do we do? I mean, because they have sought out the people with vulnerabilities.

They have sought out the people who have a sense of guilt. Why are so many white people the ones who are telling black people exactly how to live? Why are they? Because they have this sense of guilt for some reason. People with a vulnerability also, you know, you've been kept down. You've been kept down. If they can identify people that are vulnerable, the cult will offer an antidote.

And they have to have a bad guy. They have to have a Satan to point at. So what do we do about it? How do we talk to our friends? Well, there is no easy, quick, I think we can do this in 40 days. That's not going to happen. But I will tell you, as I was looking at the ways you solve it, I realized this is what has happened in so many relationships that I know of.

The wrong thing has happened. And it's because we don't know, because we are looking at this and saying, wait, think about this rationally. They can't. They can't. And that's no fault of their own. They have been manipulated and brainwashed. Getting somebody out of a cult is really hard and very frustrating. And it takes a long time. And you make a mistake and you reset.

Because it's all about trust. No, I can't say that. It's all about truly loving the other person and listening. And then no matter how angry you might get, never expressing that anger. Because if you want to save them, you must listen to them. And it's so hard. So let me give you some advice. Talking to your family and your friends.

This is going to become very critical because even our own side could splinter. And the only ones that will save the Constitution, even if it is just being lived in your own home, will be those who are exercising love in this way.

First, do not assume bad intentions. There are people that have bad intentions, but not everybody. Some of them actually believe, most of them, if they're people you know and they're your family, you know them. They don't have ill intent. They've been convinced that they're on the right side. So don't assume ill intent. And then it starts with asking questions.

I don't know how my friends got there. I really don't. How did you get here? Wait, I really want to understand. And if you try to defend yourself on this, you will lose and you'll have to start all over again some other time. So you can't get angry and you can't defend. You just want to know the answer to questions. And it has to be sincere and it has to show respect. Tell me about this. Tell me. I want to understand this.

Donald Trump and how you got there and what you think. And you got to stay calm, which is another hard one. And then you have to make the complete case, your case, complete case every single time. If you can do the first three things,

Don't assume ill intent and make sure that they know that you are not blaming them for anything. Ask them honest questions. Stay calm. Then you might be able to make your case, but you have to make the full case. And it's got to be solid. The biggest problem we have now is we are...

We are becoming almost spiritually dead. We're losing our spiritual well-being. We've got a cultural revolution, a sexual revolution. We need a spiritual restoration. We need a national revival. Find all of this now at glennbeck.com. Let me tell you about Good Ranchers. Good, delicious, high-quality meat that comes from animals raised right here in America. It is affordable at a time when meat all over the country has gone up dramatically.

and up and up literally years now. Maybe it's time you start getting your meat from a better source. Personally, I recommend Good Ranchers. Good Ranchers is running a presidential promo for a limited time. When you subscribe to any of their boxes, you're going to get a free add-on for four years. That's four years of free chicken breast or Angus ground beef, applewood bacon, or wild caught salmon with every single order.

So when you use the promo code Glenn, you'll also get $25 off your first box and free express shipping. That's $1,200 in savings and the best meat made right here in America.

Don't miss. Use the promo code Glenn. Get this presidential promo worth over $1,200 and bring 100% American meat to your family meals until 2028. That's GoodRanchers.com promo code Glenn. Good Ranchers. America's meat delivered. Now back to the podcast. You're listening to the best of the Glenn Beck program. All right. I want to tell you what happened with the FCC yesterday.

So last week, this just came out, last week the FCC adopted an order to approve the purchase of more than 200 radio stations in 40 markets. Just a couple of weeks before the presidential election. I don't think this is going to affect the presidential election.

But he's the one who's behind this is George Soros. George Soros just bought 200 radio stations in 40 different markets. Now, the vote came down in the FCC. It was partisan. Three Democrats voting for it, two Republicans voting against it. But here's the here's the real problem here.

According to existing FCC rules, foreign company ownership of U.S. radio stations is not supposed to exceed 25%. But Soros took foreign investment money to make his bid. And then he asked the FCC to make an exception to the usual review process. So the FCC fast-tracked this. Why? Why would they do that?

There's something else that is really important. You know, the left has been saying, we got to get off a dial-up. We got to get off a dial-up. We need high-speed internet for the rural areas. Well, for some reason, the FCC has delayed the rollout of the internet to rural communities. Again, why are they doing that?

Maybe the guy who has the answer is the FCC commissioner. He's Brendan Carr. Brendan, how are you, sir? I'm doing great. Wonderful to join you again. I wish we would talk on good things, you know. Call me sometimes when something, you know what, something great happened. Brendan, tell me, do I have this right, first of all, about the George Soros takeover of radio stations?

And if so, why was there an exception made and fast-tracked? Well, you know that the New York Post has a story out last week, or actually yesterday, that says that the FCC last week adopted an order that effectively fast-tracks Soros' purchase of these 200 radio stations. And I haven't commented on that publicly because the fact is the FCC hasn't released anything

a final decision to the public yet, but the reporting is that we adopted it last week in a 3-2 vote. I've been outspoken on this particular issue for the reasons that you talked about. We have a very clear process of the FCC that we've set up that could take six months, could take a year to go through to review the foreign ownership at issue here, but for reasons that are not sort of plain to me, the FCC commission, for the very first time ever, has skipped that process.

Never happened before.

That's right. We at the commission level adopted one way that you can buy radio stations if you have excessive foreign ownership, which they do. And that one process is this lengthy six to one year national security review. And it's been skipped here. Now, a lot of these stations are probably just, you know, classic rock or news, but not all of them. And they don't have to be. Right.

They get switched formats. Yeah, there's a number of stations that you're on, for instance, at least three stations that you're on that are part of this deal. Same with Sean Hannity, same with Dana Lash, same with Mark Levin. So there's at least some of these that are conservative news and talk outlets. I got to tell you, if this was a conservative doing this, I doubt the FCC would have okayed it.

Um, any ramifications? Go ahead. Well, yeah, Glenn, we actually have that example. So not too long ago, maybe a year or so ago, there was a group of conservative buyers that wanted to purchase some South Florida radio stations. And a number of Democrats spoke up very loudly and said the FC cannot allow these conservative outlets to buy these radio stations because they're

In the Democrats' view, it could cost them elections in South Florida. And amidst that pressure campaign, the conservative buyers abandoned the deal. And so we've seen across the board concerted efforts by Democrats to sort of weaponize the government to go against conservative speech. There was California Democrats in Congress that wrote a letter to cable companies telling them to drop Fox News, Newsmax,

in OAN because of the editorial decisions that their newsrooms were making. We had a Baltimore Democrat prosecutor call on the FCC to investigate a local TV station that was exposing her own corruption. And so this is sort of the reverse side of a pattern that we've been living under the last couple of years of weaponization of government power, in my view, frankly, against free speech. Now, we are told everywhere that radio is a dying medium.

Why would George Soros want to invest this kind of money? What did he say in his request? It's a good question. I mean, look, I don't know a lot of billionaires right now.

that with all of the options for where they're going to place their money, they're sitting around saying, you know what really kicks off a lot of cash right now are local radio stations. Maybe, maybe, but if anything, we're seeing the opposite. We're seeing a flight of capital from local broadcasting because it's so challenged right now with competition from social media companies and over-the-top providers. So maybe there's a business case there that they're smart enough to see that everyone else doesn't see, but that's really not the direction of the capital we're seeing right now.

And the foreign investment, do we know who these people are? No, we don't. So the Odyssey stations went into bankruptcy and the Soros group put together a bunch of investors to buy it out. And they've come forward and said, you know, there's in excess of 25%, which is the threshold of foreign entities that are investing. It's more likely than not that there's no

No big deal there at all. But the fact is, we usually run a national security review to identify who those are and whether they're fine or not. And what Soros has said, that is in the near term, they'll wall off those foreign stakeholders and then come back to the FCC down the road to run that longer sort of six month to one year process. So I think we do need to continue to stay vigilant here. This is an issue, at least with respect to that portion of it, that will come back before the FCC in the coming months. Any idea how long it'll take before he has control?

I think it will be almost instantaneous, you know, after the FCC releases a final decision that approves it. You know, they've already been sort of partly getting them out of bankruptcy. But I think it will be a near instantaneous ability to take the reins of all these 200 stations once the FCC's decision, if this reporting is right. This is such a game we're playing here. Yeah.

When do you suppose, if this reporting is right, they will report on the vote that you were involved in? I think the reporting that I've seen suggests that, you know, it could be within the next week or so. Okay. So this could actually take place before the election? Oh, yes. I would expect that, for sure. Well ahead of it.

Talk to me about the other really weird thing that happened with the high-speed Internet in rural areas.

Well, this is interesting. There seems to be a pattern emerging within the Biden-Harris administration of despite investing billions and billions of everybody's taxpayer dollars, leaving rural America behind when it comes to connectivity. So back in 2019 and 2020, we cut a deal with Echo Star, with DISH, to guarantee that they would provide 5G high-speed internet to rural America. It was part of a DOJ settlement. It was actually

actually litigated in court. It was adopted by the full commission. And then on a Friday afternoon news dump last week, the FCC's leadership, without any public input being sought, relieved Dish Echo Star of that obligation. It was just a one-sentence entry in a licensing database. And frankly, I've been at the FCC for 12 years. I've never seen anything like that. It's sort of the worst abuse of process ever.

that I've seen at the agency. You know, we had rural Americans guaranteed to get this service. It was a June 2025 build-out obligation. And Dish Echo Star came in and asked for relief on a Tuesday night last week. And by Friday, this massive relief was provided without any input from me or I'm assuming at least the Republican commissioner that I'm with. I'm trying to piece this together. Why would that happen?

Well, I think there's still a lot of questions to be answered. There was some sort of deal that was cut here, the features of which have not been publicly disclosed. I just think this is one where we still have to ask

a lot of questions. I mean, there was a rumor that I heard over the weekend that said that this company dish Echo star could potentially go bankrupt before the election. If they didn't get this relief, that's just a rumor. I don't know if it's true. But I certainly think there's a lot more to this because again, the only thing the FCC did was enter a one sentence line in its licensing database, granting this extension. So I think the agency has a lot more explaining to do to justify this significant decision. I, um,

I thank you very much for your courage, for speaking out and being the guy you are. I mean, I've been in this business for almost 50 years, and I've never even thought of an FCC commissioner because they just didn't, I don't know, they didn't have that much effect on everyday life,

And the things that are coming out of the FCC now are truly, I think, frightening, especially if you're on my end of the microphone. It is it's stuff I've never seen before. As you say, you've been a commissioner for 12 years. You've never seen it before. And it doesn't make a lot of sense unless you start to think like a, you know, like a thriller writer. And then it just becomes more terrifying. Brendan, thank you.

Enjoy it. And one day I'll come back down and we will have some good news. I'm sure it'll happen at some point. All right. Good. Thanks. Brendan Carr, the FCC commissioner, one of the good guys. I want him to come on and be like, my daughter had two hits in her softball game. Yeah. Like that's the interview I want to do with that guy. Uh-huh. That would be nice. I'd like something a little bigger than that. I just want something positive. You're listening to the best of Glenn Beck. Need a little more? Check out the full show podcasts anywhere you download podcasts.

Justin Haskins, he is the co-author of The Great Reset, Dark Future, and the latest book that we've been working on in the last year, which releases October 22nd. You can pre-order it now, Propaganda Wars.

Kind of an important book for today, especially with everything that we're talking about. But I want to talk to him now about what has happened at the UN this weekend with the United Nations Summit of the Future. Justin, welcome to the program.

Thanks, Glenn. Good to be back with you. I wish I had better news. I'm getting the reputation around Mercury Studios being kind of like the angel of death. Yeah, I know. I know. I know. Pretty much everybody who's coming on this show today is kind of like, ah, more good news from you, huh? Thank you for watching this so closely. First of all, explain what the Summit of the Future was.

Yeah, so the Summit of the Future was the culmination of several years of work. It really began during the COVID era in 2020, 2021, with the UN Secretary General producing this report called Our Common Agenda, which is something that you've talked about in several shows and specials and things like that. And so the culmination of all of that was this whole

summit of the future that they just held over the weekend prior to the start of their general assembly. As you noted, there were three agreements, all of which came out of our common agenda, PAC for the Future, Declaration of Future Generations, Global Digital Compact,

All of this is meant to dramatically expand the power and influence of the United Nations. That's the whole point of it. And I don't think it's a coincidence that they designed it. In fact, I know it's not a coincidence that they designed for all of this. They plan for it to be proposed and approved immediately before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. There's

There's a reason for that, because this is about making sure that there are plans in place, infrastructure in place. If Donald Trump does not win this election, that will further the agenda of the Biden administration and sort of the great reset crowd moving forward, no matter who wins. So talk to me about the pact for the future. There are three separate parts.

And you can look all of this up online, but give me the summary on the pact for the future. What is that?

Yes. So the Pact for the Future is a very large document, includes tons and tons of commitments by member nations. It was approved by basically the entire United Nations over the weekend, including the United States. In fact, Secretary Blinken yesterday afternoon gave a speech praising the Pact for the Future. So it includes all kinds of radical provisions.

Probably the most important one, the one that we've been looking at most closely, is something called the emergency platform. The idea behind this is to give sweeping powers to the UN Secretary General in the event of a future what they call global shock, which is not clearly defined in the document.

The idea is essentially to expand the power of the secretary general so that they can better manage at the UN international crises. So they had COVID in mind when they wrote this. So there is some good news on that. The document, the language for the document at the last minute, and I've been tracking the various revisions and versions and stuff, changed dramatically.

And they took some of that emergency platform language out and replaced it with this vague promise to have the secretary general develop a plan in the future. And so they essentially kicked the can down the road, I think, because that provision was becoming a little too controversial. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

This is so fascinating. So it was that the secretary general could just say this is an emergency, a global shock, and it is a let's say a financial shock.

And we've got to stop everybody who is disagreeing with the central banks. We all have to stand by the central banks and we have to do this and this. And he could dictate what happens in each country. Could he not? That's the way it was originally written.

It was really vaguely worded to give him sweeping power. Correct. While also respecting national sovereignty. They would throw in language like that. But to give him sweeping powers in the event of an emergency. Right. Correct. Okay. Now, did they write this in the way the Democrats write things where it's passed and it says pretty much at the time of implementation and at the discretion of the secretary? Right.

such and such will happen. Did they write it that way or does he actually have to come back and propose things or is it at his discretion? He has to, he has, so in the, up until the very end, the draft was very specifically asking him to give, you know, basically lay out the specific plans for an emergency platform. The final pass language says, this is the actual language,

consider, they want the Secretary General to consider approaches to strengthen the United Nations system response to complex global shocks within existing authorities, and dot, dot, dot. It goes on and on and on. But in other words, provide, we want you to re-propose all this stuff in the future. So it did not actually come into international law under disagreement. All right, so now hang on just a second. One other thing. When we say it passed,

There was no actual vote, right? It was you could vote against it, which nobody did.

They do this a lot. They do this a lot at the United Nations where they pass things by consensus is what it's called. And it essentially is a way for them to pass things without having to formally vote for it. But it is in the past. Yeah, it's crazy. OK. Yeah. So now the Declaration on Future Generations. What was that? And this one did not have anything removed from it. Right.

As far as I know, no. This was mainly – this is the most idealistic one. The idea behind this is to get younger people more involved in – think Greta Thunberg type – more involved in their international agreements, creating a new position at the United Nations specifically for that purpose.

all these vague commitments to socialistic policies about reducing inequalities between nations and battling climate change and stuff like that. But that one to me was the least objectionable of all of them just because it was so idealistic and vaguely worded that I don't know how damaging it would be, to be totally honest. And the Global Digital Compact is the third part, and that passed. Yeah.

Yeah, this is the most damaging one, I think. I think this is the most disturbing one. This passed as well. Essentially what this is meant to do is a few different things. It's meant to dramatically increase global governance of artificial intelligence.

They want to create a couple of different new organizations, an independent international scientific panel on AI and the global dialogue and AI governance program. They want to have more collaboration with big tech, public-private partnerships, additional funding pumped into that, all of it designed to embed artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies with AI.

left-wing social justice goals, essentially. And they're very clear about that in the document. So that's a huge thing we've been warning about for a long time going, you know, dark future was all about that. We talk about that a ton in propaganda wars and how emerging technologies is going to manipulate every part of our society. And then of course, misinformation, disinformation,

a safe and secure Internet. These kinds of things are riddled throughout the global digital compact. This is probably the largest propaganda effort the UN is about to launch, the largest propaganda effort, I think, in modern history. You've probably got to go back to like the Soviet Union or something before you're going to find something like this. They want to create all kinds of different

collaborations with the media, with big tech companies to control the internet for misinformation, disinformation, hate speech, et cetera. So specifically, here's an example. This is from the agreement. This is what was actually approved. This is just one of many examples. Quote, provide, promote, and facilitate access to and dissemination of information

independent, fact-based, timely, targeted, clear, accessible, multilingual, and science-based information to counter myths and disinformation. Strengthening independent and public media and supporting journalists and media workers. Obviously, we're talking about people who share in their values. So we're talking about creating fact-checking apparatuses at the United Nations, creating and disseminating these facts

so-called fact-based, you know, science-based assessments, which we learned during COVID and other eras that that's just whatever the UN wants it to be. It isn't actually fact-based or science-based. And then collaborating with social media companies and big tech companies to make sure that

the opposite side doesn't get to counter it. They're very clear about calling for social media companies to ramp up content moderation and make their platforms more secure and all this other stuff. So really, you could summarize the whole document like this.

The whole point of the Global Digital Compact is to get everybody off the Internet that the United Nations doesn't like, to silence people who are not going along with it, and to create a vast propaganda network that is going to constantly be pumping out their own form of misinformation and disinformation, all in the name of allegedly getting to the truth, which of course is not what they're doing.

We just talked to the FCC commissioner, Brendan Carr, about the sale of the second largest broadcasting group in America and 200 radio stations. It was paid for with foreign money, which is against the FCC regulations. No more than 25 percent can be from foreign money.

But Soros wrapped up a bunch of foreign money. And for some reason, they bypassed the law that says that has to go through the Department of Homeland Security and has to have a security check, et cetera, et cetera. So he is going to as soon as they officially announce it, which could be as early as next week, the sale will go through. We're on some of those stations.

You have this happening. The only one that is standing in the way of the global effort to shut voices down, the only one with any real clout is Elon Musk. That's one man against the world. And they want to stop him, too. Yeah, I know. This just has empowered all of the countries around the world.

and empowered them through the United Nations and gave them really kind of a blank check to stop people like Elon Musk with anything that it takes. Did it not?

Oh, without a doubt. I mean, that's the whole purpose of the Global Digital Compact that they just passed. We've talked in previous weeks about this new EU ESG system that they're building in the European Union, which is also designed to do similar things, you know.

They're trying to close down all the off ramps. You've said that for a long time. That's what they've been doing. And they're almost finished with the job. They don't want people to have any ability to counter what they're saying in a meaningful way. Yeah. If you want to sit around your kitchen table and talk to your family about things going on in the world, fine, but don't do it in public. Don't

Don't do it in a meaningful public way. That's essentially what's going on here. And as information and data and communication has become increasingly more centralized, it's becoming easier and easier to control it and manipulate it. And that is such a huge part of what's going on right now at the United Nations and elsewhere.

It's really hard to stop, you know, a thousand newspapers across the country. It's not hard to stop like five social media companies or five big tech companies. It's not that hard to do that or to force them to reform their way. And that is exactly what's going on here. And it's incredibly disturbing, but that's the plan. And there's a reason why, as I said earlier, that they're doing all of this

In the final days, final weeks, you know, before the presidential election. Okay, so I know that we have, I've scheduled an hour with you, but I feel compelled to...

talk to the audience one-on-one a little bit right after this. So can I get you to come back tomorrow because you've talked about the governance of artificial intelligence, but we haven't talked about the global wealth transfer or the embedding the GDP with ESG or any of the other things that are now locked in on the globe. Can I get you to come back same time tomorrow? Of course. Yes, let's do it. Justin, thank you so much. I appreciate it. Na-na-na.

This is the sound of your ride home with dad after he caught you vaping. Awkward, isn't it? Most vapes contain seriously addictive levels of nicotine and disappointment. Know the real cost of vapes. Brought to you by the FDA.