cover of episode Stefan Passantino: Liz Cheney’s J6 Crimes & Mission to Destroy Any Lawyer Who Dares Represent Trump

Stefan Passantino: Liz Cheney’s J6 Crimes & Mission to Destroy Any Lawyer Who Dares Represent Trump

2024/11/2
logo of podcast The Tucker Carlson Show

The Tucker Carlson Show

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
S
Stefan Passantino
T
Tucker Carlson
Topics
Tucker Carlson:对1月6日事件听证会的质疑,认为其发展过程并非完全合法,甚至带有警察国家色彩。他质疑了国会委员会的动机和行为。 Stefan Passantino:作为律师,他曾代表多位证人在1月6日委员会作证,但发现委员会滥用权力,对证人进行政治迫害,并最终将他作为替罪羊。他详细描述了丽兹·切尼及其工作人员如何与他的当事人凯西·哈钦森串通,故意陷害他,并利用CNN等媒体机构散布不实信息。他还谈到了65项目等组织如何对共和党律师进行恐吓,阻止他们为保守派辩护。他认为,国会委员会的调查并非出于善意,而是为了达到政治目的。他强调了维护律师职业道德和司法公正的重要性。 Tucker Carlson:对1月6日事件听证会的质疑,认为其发展过程并非完全合法,甚至带有警察国家色彩。他质疑了国会委员会的动机和行为,并对帕萨蒂诺的遭遇表示同情。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did Liz Cheney engage in back-channel communications with Cassidy Hutchinson while she was represented by Stefan Passantino?

Liz Cheney's back-channel communications with Cassidy Hutchinson were likely intended to manipulate her testimony to fit a political narrative, circumventing Passantino's legal representation to ensure specific damaging information about Trump was disclosed.

What was the purpose of the January 6th Committee's investigation according to Stefan Passantino?

Passantino believes the January 6th Committee's investigation was not a genuine effort to find the truth about the events of January 6th but rather a politically motivated operation to create a narrative against Trump and his associates.

How did CNN contribute to the narrative against Stefan Passantino?

CNN ran a story accusing Passantino of obstructing justice and coaching a witness to lie, based on a transcript they possessed but did not share, while ignoring exculpatory evidence that contradicted their narrative.

What was the impact of the bar complaints filed against Stefan Passantino?

The bar complaints, filed by prominent members of the legal community, aimed to discredit and potentially disbar Passantino, creating a chilling effect on lawyers willing to represent Trump or his associates, thereby undermining the right to effective legal representation.

How did the experience with the January 6th Committee change Stefan Passantino's view of Washington institutions?

Passantino's experience led him to lose faith in the integrity and ethical behavior of Washington institutions, including the media and legal bodies, which he now sees as deeply politicized and capable of orchestrating coordinated attacks on individuals for political gain.

What is Stefan Passantino's mission following his experience with the January 6th Committee?

Passantino's mission is to restore faith in legal institutions by advocating for the right to effective legal representation for all, challenging the culture of fear that deters lawyers from representing certain political figures, and promoting transparency and accountability in government.

Why did Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony change after she terminated her relationship with Stefan Passantino?

Hutchinson's testimony changed after she terminated her relationship with Passantino due to external influences, including back-channel communications with Liz Cheney and her staff, who coached her to provide testimony that would fit their political narrative against Trump.

What evidence did Chairman Latterman uncover that supported Stefan Passantino's allegations?

Chairman Latterman uncovered text messages and communications that showed coordination between Liz Cheney, her staff, and Cassidy Hutchinson, providing evidence that Passantino was set up to obstruct justice and that Hutchinson's testimony was manipulated.

How did the January 6th Committee's actions impact Passantino's professional and personal life?

The Committee's actions led to public accusations, bar complaints, and a criminal investigation against Passantino, severely damaging his professional reputation and causing significant stress and trauma to his personal life, including his relationships with his family and friends.

What does Stefan Passantino suggest should be done to prevent similar abuses of power in the future?

Passantino suggests that there should be stricter oversight and accountability for congressional investigations, ensuring they adhere to legislative functions rather than acting as law enforcement bodies. He also advocates for protecting the right to effective legal representation and restoring faith in government institutions.

Chapters
Stefan Passantino discusses his involvement in the January 6 aftermath and his role as a lawyer representing witnesses before the January 6 committee, highlighting the political nature of the investigations and the challenges of navigating Washington's bureaucracy.
  • Passantino represented numerous witnesses before the January 6 committee.
  • He emphasizes the political narrative created by the committee rather than genuine fact-finding.
  • The scale of the investigation was much larger than anything seen during the McCarthy hearings.

Shownotes Transcript

No one has ever gone to prison for the real crimes of January 6th. Liz Cheney destroyed a man’s life to cover up her role in the hoax. Here’s what really happened.

(00:22) The January 6th Aftermath

(05:24) What Role did Liz Cheney Play in the J6 Committee?

(12:18) Cassidy Hutchinson’s Pivotal Testimony

(32:27) Was Hutchinson’s Testimony True?

(50:24) How CNN Manufactured the Narrative Against Passantino

(59:07) The Intimidation Tactics Used Against Trump’s Lawyers

(1:17:07) Hutchinson’s Motive

(1:27:30) The Destruction of Evidence

Paid partnerships with:

Eight Sleep

Get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra

https://EightSleep.com/Tucker)

** **Levels

https://Levels.Link/Tucker)

2 extra months free

Meriwether Farms

https://MeriwetherFarms.com/Tucker)

Use promo code “TCN24” to save

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)