Colby argues that the liberal interventionist alliance has overextended the U.S., pushing it to the brink of war in multiple theaters, which could result in catastrophic losses. He highlights the over-commitment to conflicts like Ukraine and the lack of focus on rebuilding the U.S. defense industrial base.
Colby advocates for a return to a more balanced and realistic foreign policy, focusing on peace through strength. He suggests emulating the Republican tradition of avoiding unnecessary wars, such as the Nixon administration's approach during the Cold War, and being prepared to defend U.S. interests without crossing lines that could provoke major conflicts.
Colby criticizes the current approach to Ukraine for its lack of clear goals and connection to American interests. He argues that the U.S. has not achieved its objectives and has instead depleted its resources, making it less prepared for other potential conflicts, particularly with China.
Colby suggests that the U.S. should avoid significant conflicts with Iran, learning from the ill-advised nature of past interventions in the Middle East. He emphasizes the need for clear goals and a direct connection to American interests before engaging in such conflicts.
Colby calls for accountability within the CIA and the military to ensure that these institutions are not above reproach and are held to high standards of conduct. He believes that the intelligence community and the military should be transparent and subject to scrutiny, especially given their involvement in controversial actions and policies.
Colby views the potential for a nuclear exchange with Russia as very real and dangerous, especially given the current tensions and the rhetoric from both sides. He emphasizes the need for a realistic and cautious approach to avoid such a catastrophic scenario.
Colby suggests that the U.S. should focus on defending Taiwan while avoiding direct conflict with China. He advocates for a strong defensive posture combined with a rational and diplomatic approach to convince China that peace is in its best interest.
Colby criticizes the Wall Street Journal for its inconsistent and incoherent foreign policy positions, often advocating for aggressive policies in multiple theaters while acknowledging the U.S. military's poor state. He believes the Journal is out of touch with conservative and Republican views on trade and national security.
Colby sees a potential generational shift within the Republican Party, with younger members who are more aligned with President Trump's priorities and less invested in the old interventionist model. He hopes for a new generation of leaders who will focus on American interests and avoid unnecessary conflicts.
Elbridge Colby is one of the very few experienced national security officials who actually agrees with Donald Trump. He’s likely to play a big role in the new administration.
(00:00) The Steps Trump Needs to Take To Avoid WWIII
(09:10) The Dangers of War With Iran
(18:10) Why Is The Blob Pro-War?
(24:52) We Need to Hold the CIA Accountable
(32:49) What Should Trump Do About Russia and Ukraine?
(48:50) The Pentagon’s Support for Foreign Wars
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)