Dr. Pierre Kory
52:02 Share

Of all the lies told in public over the past ten years, and there are almost twenty count, this may be the most painful of all, almost hard to washed. But we're going to play IT anyway. Remember this, make your plan to get one of these vaccines. They are safe and affected.

First one message, the needs to cut through all this. The vaccines are safe. I promise you, they are safe and effective. Listen, the doctor for chi, when we say that something is safe and effect, that we mean it's safe and effective for everyone, our fascinations against the nineteen are safe, they are effective and they're more important than ever. This vaccine has gone through the necessary and rigorous evaluation that ensures the vaccine is safe and effective.

Course, they were not their safe nor effective. And that was obvious right away, as people who took the vaccine continued to get code, and more ominously, as some of them began to die and a lot of them, proper people around you, got sick in ways that no one anticipated. Anyone watching this carefully and watching IT at all with know both of those things.

And yet most physicians in this country lied about IT continue. And to this day, why about IT? That's the topic of another show.

But today we'd like to introduce you to someone who bravely told the truth, regardless of the cost to himself personally. And that's just peer corry. He's the president, chief medical office of the front line, critical carinus.

And you points us now. thanks. Thanks so much for coming on. And the the point is really not to resurrect an incredibly painful moment in the countryside story IT hurt even to watch that aren't people in jail, but to assess the cost now. So you hear and wondering them so gratefully here, because I think your responsible science space person is practice medicine for a decade, and what you say can be trusted. Do we have any real sense of what the cost, the physical cost to the country and world has been of those vaccines?

I I do think we haven't some understanding of the cost. I mean, if I think you know you're where the work of of ed doubt, who's put together a team and looked analytically a lot of the epidemiologic data, I mean, we have estimates for how many people have been killed.

We have estimates now pretty precise sets for how many people have landed on the disability rules and all of those deaths and entries on to disability or time with the answer of the vaccination roll out. And you know all these discussions about alternative explanations for why that might be um they all fail because you cannot argue against the temporal association. I mean, time with that vaccination allowed is when all of the customers started going side with the excess mortality started to the sky rocket, the disabilities that claim such the sky work. So it's an immense cost start. I I mean, we can be precise but give sense.

like you were tip and on the conservative side know trying to be as responsible, in fact basis possible. But in this country, what kind of death talk we're looking at.

So just the most kind of alarming data that i've been writing about is just in twenty, twenty three alone. In the first nine months, we had what's called an excess mortality of one hundred and fifty eight thousand americans. Now that's compared to baseline death rats in this country to before the pandemic.

But this is in twenty twenty three. I mean, we've we've had omicron now for two years, which is a mild variant. Not that many go to the hospital when you look at which driving those hundred and fifty thousand days. And by the way, that's more than all wars since vietnam, including vietnam, that's more people dying than we've lost in in nine months. In nine months of twenty twenty .

did not to eleven years.

exactly in nine months. Now all of that one hundred fifty thousand is not all from, let's say, vaccines. There's a portion that is from covet obviously have other societal ills which are troubling us.

We have a drug epidemic. We have death of despair. But those are actually pretty well accounted .

for and have been going .

on for exactly. You can't blame all that. Fo did not just arrive in this country in the third quarter of twenty one.

And and even more troubling in with the data is who is dying. It's not the elderly. I mean, our life expectancy in this country drop by three years in the span of three years.

And who has to die or athletically for that to happen? Young people. And what the data screaming is that is not only the Young people are dying, but there are the healthier and most employed.

So the employed is a risk factor for death now. And so you're left with a conclusion. Looking at this data, you left with two big questions.

Why was there an explosion in the Youngest in the explosion and dying the Youngest and healthy sectors of society? And why did the employed far, far worse than those that warrant? And is particularly White color, White color more than great color, more than blue color. And so you left .

for the question, fared worse, fared worse, the opposite of what you'd .

expect one hundred percent. So why is the healthiest, most educated, wealthier sectors of our labor dying at higher rates than those that are we're called great color, like cops and teachers versus blue color. And you have to ask yourself, what happened in the american work? What covers? That's crazy. Never, never.

This is unhealth .

society. Gin always happen for very good reason. They tend to be the most educated, yes, employed, you know, wealthy. And so generally, the health ist of all .

the rifted is best food.

one hundred percent exercise. And that's that's what my practice is full of today, is formally really successful, healthy people who are now effectively disabled.

That's even worse than I understood.

H, it's been hard to watch.

And when you make reference to people disability rules.

one of those numbers look like so in three years, we've added, I think, the last count of four million people to the disability rules. And again, again, another signal, who ended this disability rules, the employed ended the higher rates than the unemployed. And so why are, again, why are most healthiest employed folks are dying at higher rates? You think?

I mean, not to be rude, but I mean, I think social scientists have thought this for a long time. Disabilities is kind of health. Welfare for a lot of people can be IT can be sure. But if your people are leaving for decent jobs, that's that the medical .

good point, you get point. Why would someone leave a job to go on disability? I mean, disabilities is not now compared to being employed. It's sure that doesn't offer you the same.

No, it's like a seasonal thing. You're carpenter in a cold climate when the time to go disability.

But that's not this. No, that's not this. And and and the most telling is really the data from the group life insurance industry because group life insurance is generally, you're talking about fortune five hundred companies, right? So those of us who work from employers that offers group life held interest tend to be large corporations. Well, you that have the kind of resources that they can support their labor force that way.

And when you look at the group life insurance industry, that that was the kind of the canary in the coal mine is when we started to see the reports in the life insurance industry where you are in the third quarter of twenty twenty one, just immense, a doubling of the death rates in the age groups of twenty five to thirty twenty, yeah, twenty five to thirty four and thirty five to forty four. And in one quarter you just saw this explosion and dying. And no one's asking the question.

Talker, I mean, okay, so it's a you've been practicing medicine for decades. You practice for a long time in an academic setting in a big, big research university. So presume ly, you're from me with these kind of data sets. Is anything like this happened that you're aware before.

unprecedented, and that comes from ceos of the life and turn industry. So one of the the big uh sort of events was at the end of twenty twenty one, uh the CEO of one america, one of the largest life insurance uh companies at a chAmber of comers commerce meeting in indian apple as said that they were observing an increase in life insurance claims of forty percent. Now let's put that in context.

He also said a rise of ten percent U T remember this is life insurance industry. What how they make their money? Oh, predicting that very actually setting premiums are probably so that there's a profit if they see a ten percent unexpected rise in a certain sector of society.

That is a one in two hundred year event. And here he says that they seem forty percent unprecedented side of war time outside of some major terrorist event. What could be causing such an explosion and dying of healthy employed people? And this is the secret that we know. This is almost like private knowledge, because we can bring this private knowledge out into common lodge is very few vehicles to do that. I think you've given the opportunity for many of us who have this private, really disturbing knowledge um but it's a chAllenge.

You've been prescribed medication for B, P, H, or enlarged prostate. You don't like the idea of a daily medication for the rest of your life. If you have to take IT forever is IT really worth IT.

But that's what the doctor ordered. And symptoms from B, P, H were negatively impacting life. A week flow, an urgent need to go erupted sleep. Now you feel stuck between medications that aren't really doing the trick and the idea of invasive surgery. There may be another option, a minimally invasive procedure covered by most insurance called the year live system. The year liph system may provide up to three times the symptom relief as a common B P H medication based on early data from a head to head study men and over no B P H S dot com to learn and find a eulie system trained doctor near you. Most set of extra temporary can include discomfort when you're netting, urgency, inability to control the urge, pl pain in some blood in the urine, rare set of x including bleeding and infection may lead to a serious outcome and may require invention the minimum invasive your live system go to no B, P, H meds dot com down.

Junior, here guys, are you receiving letters from the IOS claiming you go back taxes as penalties and interest fees piled up?

The IOS gives, you know, clear path to resolution. Don't speak to them on your own. They are not your friends to reach a team, licensed tax professionals that going to help you reduce, settle and resolve your tax matters.

go to T N U S, A dot. Come and check out, solve your test problems today, one hundred seventy eight eight, or visit T N U S A 点 com。 That's one eight hundred seven eight zero eight eight eight eight.

What is just so crazy to me, I believe this is happening. And by the way, I ve know where the agenda. I don't want to happen. I think it's awful actually.

Well, I think if I you know looking at you the kind of the montage you showed before we started to talk that that refrain of safe and effective, it's my kind of belief looking back. And now that was a predetermined inclusion. There was no data to support that, but IT was agreed upon that we'd be presented as safe, effective.

And for those of us who were a little bit more skeptical of more data driven, we saw that IT was based on really no data, and the data started going side with south. But the refrain got louder and more pervasive. And then they double down this, not to demonize the end back.

That's a criminal act describes so I mean I could ask you so many different questions um about why the people who made that claim habet the pilling of all these americans aren't being held to criminal liability for that. But now there is is a war. Uh, what was the effect on your life when you started to describe the data you are seeing?

Yeah so i'm going to say that before I sort of doug, deep on the data, I was seeing things clinically that was really troubling me the amount the clan just observation ally in my practice.

people are present treating this isn't data.

This isn't, you know, numbers on just just my reality started to send me that something was going.

That same thing happened to me.

Question to other colleges that I know there were observed like what you see. So people started to come to me complaining of lots of different problems after the, and I was advocating for a lot of things, fighting censorship, prop again. And there's lots of lies that were told in covering vaccine one, satellite suppression of early treatment drugs is another.

They were kind of mirror images at each other. They both have the same golf, a slightly different tactics, but prop again, and censorship with the main weapons. So i've been kind of fighting one war and then got very interested in the vaccines, because I saw a huge need.

I've started to meet lots of vaccines, injure that, to work with some of those nonprofits, you know, my nonprofit, which is where of medical education organization focus solely on developing treatment protocols for all phases of a prevention treatment, long vacs long over. And but then I started, we started get really interested in vacine injury because there was a new disease, was a new problem. And and I also want to tell another deception, the entire country medical system calls the chronic problems after cover.

They call IT long cover IT. right? You've heard of the terminal. This is long. Someone expert at IT, but the reality is if you look at my practice, maybe twelve hundred patients um seventy percent are long.

Vx not long cover IT, meaning all of their issues, the syndrome started after the vaccine not cover the vast majority of long, vast. And so the only disease that's recognized in this country is long covered. All the academic medical centres, they have these little long covered clinics. It's not vacine injury clinics, is long cover clinics. So there's this constant barring of the role of the vaccine and what's befAllen society.

But why? I mean, that's so evil that is hardly ly it's .

IT threatens so much IT not only threatens the reputation, credibility of health agencies, which is already, I think, splinter red and fragment. Yes, mean, week ago, a paper was published in journal american, a mi association. I just saw that this morning where they actually survey people's attitudes towards the agencies and the vaccines, and a majority, about half to sixty percent, all half concerns of whether these things are safe.

Now I don't think that was gonna the answer two years ago, but a good portion of society now is now questioning not only whether the agencies are telling the truth when they make these, but you can sit in there hasn't city to get the goose ers. I mean, those numbers are pluming. So I do think that people are slowly becoming well.

But for those who has been aware for a long time, i'm trying to fight to get people informed. It's been award. It's been a long couple years and we've said all of us have suffered from censorship, loss of jobs. I've lost three jobs and cover from my advocate and expertise, and so has been easy.

But we lost jobs in science.

Well yeah I lost clinical jobs. First one I after made I violent, I resigned um but for very serious reasons I saw what I thought was unethical behavior that was early uncovered. The second one is because I gave public testimony in the senate around the use the new survivor macon. And then the third one um is pretty clear that that came from outside they told that hospital to get rid of me because they had .

said too many component doctors. They didn't need .

another something like that talker.

did you?

Everything that could happen never, never I mean, if you look at my partner, right? So my organization where we call ourselves fcc c um found by professor paul mark, who is the most published practicing intensively in the history of our he was rail wrote out of his hospital with a chief of complaints about his behavior after thirty years as a physician, as a celebrated musician is one awards if electuary all over the world.

Suddenly he has eight complaints and they get rid of his privileges my other colleague and bear to medi, one of the world experts on the use of cortical steroid. He works for the va, which is the federal government. And he gets, he gets pressure to resign.

They told him that would take his pension if he didn't resign. And he was also privily called that. That information came from washington, and we i've seen this in some my other colleagues, jim thorpe, one of the most outspoken oby guys in the country.

He lost his job, even being the most productive physician in that group. Uh, we know that the pressures come around, that they want the they need us to lose our jobs so that we lose credibility, so that we lose our voice. Because nobody wants to listen to someone who is incredible. They do this to Bobby I kenney all the time to try a sensor him, right? And because if they can get you to shut up, they just take away your reputation.

You, if the evidence presented, you suggest is strong, that the compound suggestion or requiring is killing people, you would think your own conscience would restrain you. I can can push the shit. People are dying. I doesn't anyone think that .

I don't want to make excuses for people's behavior, but I will be generous and say, I think many of them traffic in a toxic medical intervention. I think that many can claim ignorance because I think most physicians are victims of the lies propagated in the high impact journals. That is a whole issue. What's happened to the high impact medical Jones of the last several decades have they're been completely captured and run by the form actual industry means that format al industry can get doctors to believe whatever they want.

And publishing in a .

small is absolutely well. I usually say the big five, it's new, the journal of medicine, generally american association, the land, the bm j and and als of internal medicine, there's a few others.

But when you get a paper in there, I mean, that's like, you know, planting a take in the ground of truth, right? And so if you get a paper reviews, paper saying that something safe, effective, those doctors who are now responsible to inform you, because this is the heights of science, this is the best journals done by the best. This is the impression they have.

And I gotto tell, talk. This is what I believe before code, I literally ideal lizer, uh deify those journals, I really thought the best science and scientists were published there. And through this journey in the world, in the world by far.

And to get a paper in there, I thought I had to be, you know, air tight, best of study design, the most particular data keeping analysis. And what i've discovered is that not true and has them and true for a long time. And former editors of those journals are on record.

They have written books as long as twenty years ago. The former editor of new the junk motion, a woman in dr. Martin Angel SHE, wrote that over half of what's published in those journals you should not be believed.

And he was a twenty year editor of the top journal in the world. Former metres of the bmg have tried to say that these warnings have been put up, but they're suppressed. We don't have a class in medical school, by the way, of pharmaceutical industry influence in medicine.

I think that would should be required curriculum for anyone going into medicine. But we are purposely kept in the dark as to how controlled and how much financial interest are involved in everything. The guidelines we read, the studies that are done, the studies they are not done, right? So there's things they don't want to study because they don't afford profits to the system. And so IT gets it's got really dark for me at the way I look at science and medicine now .

is extremely different than just freaking me out, did you?

So how aware of any of this? Were you funny? I think my understanding of pharmacy al industry corruption was like at the level of the drug grap, the very pretty your hands comes with the high heels and the nice smile and gives pens and offers didn't like I thought I was that kind of corruption was like most of what? Yeah yeah.

Now that's that's like the icing on the cake. They literally bake the cake um and they can get doctors going that original question. They can get the actors to believe whatever they want to get.

Doctors believe doctors have still have an implicit faith and trust the institutions of sites, including which is the agency. So agency heads, when they make a proclamation on national television that's considered to be scientific truth uh, something published in the high impact medical journal is scientific truth. So they believe these institutions, without knowing that they've been captured.

Thanks for watching that amazing conversation with doctor peer coy. Now if you're certain age and you believe in the dignity of the individual, you probably think government is the greatest threat to your freedom and your well being. And IT may be the government doesn't act alone.

IT acts intend them in this country. And this is a new thing with corporate america. It's corporate amErica that's making amErica ugly. It's corporate amErica is building dollar stores in your neighbor. D is corporate amErica that employees the hr morons who scores you and try to dehumanize you.

You hate to think we've gotten to a place where corporate amErica is a great the threat to you as, say, the federal government under joe biden, but IT is. So what do you do about IT? Will we recently discovered a marketplace that is doing its very best to change that is called public square.

And established a new way of connecting commerce by connecting you with over eighty thousand small businesses that may share your values and feels good to put your money where your values are. Learn more at public square dot com. Why do you think all these people .

were dying from the vaccine? Yeah, now we're going to get sciences .

about why do they I mean to I understand everything you're saying and i'm trying to be compassionate and I been misled many times in my life and so people can be yeah, but if you have a massive rise in life insurance claims in group policies like even I understand that is wait w what's going on? How do they account for that?

They don't know about that. They don't know about that. I mean, I would say things have changed in the last few months. So since August, myself in my writing partner, a maribeth five, a really terrific investigative journalists who first wrote a book looking to chronic line disease. She's done great work through our covet and SHE.

And I have now written three ope's in USA day news week and then a couple we go the hill and each op ed is a little bit more for it's calling attention to all of the access death. Like why is our government, our public health agency, is not doing anything about that. I mean, they literally have one job which is to protect public health.

Yeah and they're sitting on an unprecedented surge in dying of americans, the Youngest and healthiest of americans, and they seem to not be questioning that. And so we are trying to call attention to that. And I would say the last one that I published in the hill that seemed to create a little bit of a new cycle, you know, was on fox with law england.

I think they worked. He was interested in learning more about this. And and we've seen that, you know, there's a little bit social media traction, but there there's no official governmental recognition.

Now theyve put out papers are showing that they're aware of the mortality, but no follow. They just or we'll give a list of reasons, right? Like the list of reasons, well, they don't want always get as ridiculous as global warming, but they get close. Just trying to explain away this sudden n surgeon death.

and I can be done. So what I mean, what's the cdc, for example, the federal government, or broadly doing for the vaccine injured very.

very little or giving an example. So remember there is no no such thing as vacation injury syndrome. Although I specialized and have a whole practice which focuses on IT, it's all long cover so let's just pretend that they're studying vacine jury with long covered um one point two billion dollars has been uh dedicated to funding long covered research.

This is as of two months ago, only four trials were set up to enrolled patients. Only one trial was ready to enroll patients and that was a trial studying packs lovat px loved if anyone could ever tell me one rational reason why that would work in long covet and all years is no just a viable rationals for why you would study pack low. And now why you would want to study pack, float, that I can easily answer is a very profitable drug for certainty for a suitable company.

Literally were three years into the pandemic. We don't have like a really good response into studying and treating long cover. Instead, it's me in a whole network of colleagues in my organza that really sharing experiences and insights in the path of physiology.

We're doing reviews of like a lot of basic science studies showing this what the ms of injury are from the Spike protein, from the virus, from the vaccine. And we're trying to martial mechanistic therapies. But like IT is like where out where out here in the world west doing IT on our own. And it's really ashamed because IT doesn't have to be this way.

This is not what you send up for a new you became a physician.

No, I mean, I was a system physician. I was embedded in that system like I told you. I was, uh, I believed in the journals I taught.

I taught what I was taught. I believe all vaccines were safe. I never question vaccines. I mean, so why do you think .

and I think you speak for the overall, the majority of americans you think are basics. You know, you even flaky politicians are weird seasons. But the the systems of institutions that make this not third world are totally sound.

I think everyone thought, I thought that. But why? What about you allowed you to see what was happening? And be honest about IT. Why not everyone else?

Well, i've always questioned orthodoxy, specially in medicine, from early when I was a doctor, what I would come in and I got some training and I would come into new ICU or new hospital. I'd see like how they were treating, for instance, in like kidding injury. And I be like, that's weird.

That's like data from fifteen years ago, like aren't we doing in this way? We now know this, this, this and that can apply to almost any of heart failure, your heart attacks. I mean, I knew there was evidence showing more inside and more effective therapies, but yeah, we doing stuff, stuff in the past.

And I just think changing in medicine comes very slowly. And I was always in an early adopter. I'd like to study new novel therapies. And so I was actually, I thought about paul mark.

I was celebrated in my specialty, pretty well known nationally, even internationally, because I was a pioneer in a fuel called critical care, ultra pornography, and a textbook that I was the senior editor of this, like one of the best selling textbooks in that field around the world at seven languages. And so I taught for years around the country a doctor, this new skill and how to use ultrasound to make life saving diagnoses like critically ill. You know, patients crashing, you put a probe on their chest, you get the heart was doing the right venture left to the longs of full food.

So IT was the huge, like I did changed my life when I learned ultra sand. I felt like as a super doctor, like a doctor was super cars. And I tried to teach those powers, and IT became standard care.

Now there's not a nice in the country that doesn't have an ultrasound machine in the most critical care. Doctors now get trained. There's specification exams that you can do.

And I that's what I did for most my cream. I got interested in something called the therapeutic couple therapy, which is how to treat the patients, have to court arrest with brain injury. And so and I just finish by saying, when kova came, you know, I was like, game on.

And I was fifty years old on a permanent critical care physician. I saw prominent critical care disease literally enveloping the world. And I just, I think you lately just committed to learning everything I could to figure out how to treat.

And I had, as some giants around my add, pol marram, I had a Better to mata road joe phone, you know, and how a glaces, that's kind of the five I C. Dox that started our organization. And all we did was read papers and the emails, like preparing servers and the papers are we reading.

And then we're fashioning protocols. We were learning stuff that work. And what did in and just IT was a frennette push. And it's it's something that they should have had. They should have done that at at the government level, had like a group of committed front line conditions, have a ceded the table, no collision is everyone get the to the table, no real front.

My question mean, a doctor who treat page?

Yes, yeah, yes. Someone who was literally immersed in patient care. Now you have people in those three letter agencies who, yes, we'll see patients on the side most of time and especially the officers, they weren't valued seeing like these acutely ill covered patients to the hundreds of not thousands.

I was seeing him not only at the most severe stages of the game and in the ice, but also saw an outpatient. And so I had a wealth of experience and inside into the disease. How to treat IT, no ever asked us. And whenever I would try to bring out my um insights seem to get a attacks.

So what does you think of the mean for a while? My impression is that the putting people in respirator is part of protocol.

Well, yeah, you know it's that's just it's a little bit IT. It's definite more nuance than that. But I would say this the push to put someone eventless, they probably did IT too early as a rule early on I think a few things drove that IT was ignorance of the disease, the projector disease.

Think there's a little bit of fear around controlling infections. So that definitely think ventilators were overused. Um but that wasn't in map in the main problem. Main problems is that we were not treated. We were literally saying supportive care only this is the first year you know fluid for hydration, uh nutrition, oxygen, tent for fever that's was called .

supportive I can yes you .

um but you know that seem to be the the our response and my paul says, you know my partner says, no, there is no disease you cannot treat and there is really simple stuff that we knew that would help forty five immune systems and help protect against severe disease that we thought that are super safe. That on a this benefit precautionary principle we should have as a rule just recommended vitamin for one.

We should have a vm d you know supplementation campaign or uh nationwide would have been very easy to do. Now as an aside, vitamin has been one of most attacked substances over last three or four decades by the former civilian IT threatens, IT threatens the disease model. I mean, we can make, we can do in our invitation in d talker.

But vitamin, like a milk.

yes, like vitamin, vitamin is a whole other discussion. But they're terrified of vitamin.

Our Normal can say if you find yourself terrified invitations.

you're probably on the wrong side exactly. You're probably on the roadside there you got, you got but but yeah, no, it's it's you. I wrote a book called the war and iver matt and and the the genesis. That book not only is my expertise on iver matten and my vast clinical experience, but, and I tell the story before, but I got an email during this journey from a guy and a William big grand. He is a professor in california.

And he wrote me this email just one day, my was going totally sideways because our protocols focused on our macan was using a lot of my practice as where tens of thousands of doctus around the world to really good benefits. And I was getting attacked, was hit jobs in the media, and he wrote me, the female, and he said, their art corry, what they're doing to a mecon, they've been doing to vitamin for decades, and included a link to an article called the disinformation playbook. And it's got five tactics, and these are the five tactics that all industries employ when science emerges that in convened to their interest, I just going to give an exam.

Every american science was extremely inconvenient. The interests of the pharmacia industry complex. I mean. Threatened the vaccine campaign and threaten vaccine hesitancy, which was public enemy number one. We know that that everything, all the public and the was literally going after something called vaccine residents.

Yes, trying to experience vaccine dents.

terrible condition or lifetime. So for for IT could be a life saving condition but um they deployed this information and I didn't understand what was going on talker because when I print since I gave testimony um in a senate hearing for the first time in may of twenty twenty and nothing do that. I mean, I just said that was critically important.

That critical story be used in the hostel phase of the disease. I was attacked widely for saying that even by my own university, they did not want me talking to the press. And I was based on the expert painting of my group bar to medi was one of them like seven, one of the world experts in lung, injuring critical.

Third, myself and paul l. And we were validated there because two months later, a trial and of oxford showing that huge mortality reductions in. And now it's a stand of care worldwide.

Six months later, I go back now, an expert at an early treatment drug, which is I i've removed in, do the same testimony. IT goes viral on on a fox news website, which is the most watched, got a ten, nine million views. And that was taking down in the middle night.

And this is before the fragment trials, which showed that is supposed to they didn't work. So they had no data show that didn't work all the day to show that that work. Now they change that equation using this information.

But the point is, I couldn't figure out, like I gave that testimony, the associated depressed and hit job on me. Within two days, they they sent a reporter, buried her with all the state to all these trials, all these health ministries, you in south america, other places that were literally a obliterating covet. And SHE wrote an article about how um it's another drug to be the bond like hydrox y clerkin.

And then he even wrote about some couple who drank like A A fish cleaner or something like that. This is in an article interviewing me about, i've met and I turned into this, we actually fall in ethics, complete this, how naive I was at the time. This is almost two years ago.

But over two years ago, we found the ethics complaint with the associated press. We were so disturbed by this article. We didn't know that the fix was in, but the point of that story is when he sent me the article, the link to that article, I read IT, and he was like, my mind exploded. I suddenly saw the world different, because every tactic that they described, I had dozen examples of in relation to other and even hydrox y clerk at. And so I saw that myself and our organization were literally like the bad newsbeat's fighting like a war at this in global disinformation campaign, trying to destroy early effective treatment drugs in order to prop up this vaccine campaigns.

craziness.

That's my life.

So but what you're really saying is that the drug companies applied pressure to the medical establishment to withhold lifesaving treatment so that people would have no option but the vaccine differently.

I think all of IT starts at the level of medical journals because once you have something established in the medical journals as a, let's say, approve in fact, or are generally accepted consensus, consensus comes out of the journals. So I think that's the core of the corruption.

And what I in fact, in my book, I document very well, and particularly just using the example of i've method does not have to be about, I ve meant, but I mean, I have dozens of rejection letters from investigators around the world who did good trials, and i've met and tried to published, no, thank you. No, thank you. No, thank you.

And then the ones that do get in all proportionally prove that i've made in work. So and then when you look at the ones that actually got in, and this is where, like probably my biggest, strangest, and why I don't recognize science, don't trust that anymore, is the trials, that fluid publication in the top centrals in the world were so brazenly manipulative and corrupted in the design and conduct in many of us wrote about IT. Um but they flew a publication.

And then every time they were published you saw these huge P. R. Campaign, the media, new york times, boston global at times I ver macon doesn't work.

Latest high quality, rigorous study says, i'm sitting here in my office watching these lies just ripple throughout the media's sphere based on fragment studies, publishing the top journals and that that that has chained. That's why I say i'm estranged and I don't know what to trust anymore. Hills dale college offers many great free online courses, including a recent one on marxism, socialism and communism.

Today, marxism goes by different names to make itself seem less dangerous. Names like critical race there, gender theory and decode ization. No matter the names this online core shows, it's the same marxism that works to destroy private property and that will lead to famines, show trials and gulags.

Start learning online for free at tucker for hills dale outcome. That's tucker F O R hills dell dot com. Monday sales event now for some of the best deals of the season, a blind stock com design expert can help you make the perfect selection on your schedule. We can handle everything from measure to your whole home install with over twenty five million .

windows covering line. Sot com is the number one online retailer of custom window coverings set up to 45s lus in professional number right now。 Also question very much.

You speak for so many but you speak from obviously a much deeper er reservoir of knowledge when you say that which makes IT I live um is there .

hopeful reform um at the medical journal level, I don't know. I think that's a complex topic, although I want to get political here. But I did listen to an interview with our kid, and he, he, I heard this, i'd never forgot to us, to me, spoke to my heart beat. He said one of if he would ever become president and one of his first orders of business would to call into the oval office the chief editors of all the top journals and tell them clean up iraq, or i'm going after you with reo a statue as a rotarian opposition.

Which is interesting because the name of the chapter, there's a chapter my book called the editorial and so when I heard that Bobby Kennedy was going to bring these guys in the old love is and threatening with reo, you know, statute, I was like, oh, he knows what he's doing. He knows exactly what the problem is on what to do about yes, so but as far as reform, you know going back maybe this this this current issue that you kind of invite me to talk about, right? Just which is this um just unprecedented access mortality that we're observing, not only in this country, right? I don't know if you follow, but U K, there is a couple of brave politicians.

They're trying to bring this uh issue to the forefront uh australia, canada, a lot of the advanced health come as the world are seeing really large and unexplained excess mortal is even as covered is wind in severity um but in order to address this, I mean, first of all, this is the clearest entitlement of our public health agencies, which is just their inaction. The knowledge that this is currying and they're not doing anything tells you that they have fail. That is the most clear evidence that they have failed and are fAiling.

Um if they were functioning, this would be a major public health initiative. There will be lots of funding. You have tons of studies looking at causes.

And these studies are easy, by the way, because they could do one thing that no one has done in vents s, which is give us open source, rigorous stata of vaccination status and outcomes. We want to know who's on vaccinate, who's vaccinated and how they're doing, and they try to avoid doing that. So there are solutions to doing that.

But I think you need people free of conflicts. I think we need, we need like industry to get involved, not just the academics in the agency folks, but like princess, get someone whose conflicts of interest would promote. Study like this, like the insurance industry, they are looking into a show lacking.

They are getting hammed. Look at how much they paying out. You can see in some of the industry trade magazines, they literally have never paid out this much money.

And and keep in money. You pay out a policy on the thirty two year old, how much money of you loss compared to when you pay one out. And so seventy.

And there there is a collaboration of insurance guys that i've worked with. By the way, I was on a call, you're in a half. I was invited to present data to a group from a whole bunch of different life insurance companies.

Almost all of them had their cameras off, and almost none said anything I would say about thirty people on the call. Only two people actually had their cameras off or asking detail questions. But they showed up. And I found out from the guys organized that many of them were like under the sea wasn't the CEO showed up, but send someone there to listen. And so they're were well aware of this.

And if you think about the insurance industry, right, how much they've done to protect the health of a country, again, in their interest, but like automobile safety, would see bet, fire codes, electrical codes, noticable building rate, all of those things obviously protects their business, but that also protects their health. And I would just like to see maybe some someone whose interest in finding out the answer, why everyone's dying. I mean, I think that industry wants to know that answer more than any other, and they have the resources to do IT. But I think government and other medical experts need to help, and they need to be of a diverse factors and transparent.

Such a wise point. So I just want to end by um hearing what you are seeing in your clinical practice now with the vaccine injured. And I think it's important that people hear IT because everybody knows somebody. I know a couple of people um but it's sort hard to know like what are we looking at?

What are you seeing? So how this is how I divide this is just kind of my perception of vacant injuries that when I used to traveling injury, i'm usually referring to what I call a single organ problem like paracuta is my accordia a stroke something like that? No ommen disease.

Would I specialize in my practice as I D three patients worth what we call long cover, long vex? It's the same disease, just different trigger, right? One is trigger by cover.

The other one is trigger by the spite protein from the vaccine much more common as long vacs. The only real differences between the two conditions is that the vaccinated are on average sicker and more disabled than the long cow. It's with some pretty prominent exceptions to that. Um but the point I want to kind of give you a tuckers that the disease, although has a new name, long cover, it's not a new disease. It's been around for a decades and it's traditionally been called bio gic and sephora light slash chronic fatigue syndrome which M E C fs you of CF of course yeah that's effectively what long cover and long backs is, because the hallMarks of that disease is a new, inexorable fatigue, what's called a post exertional malays. Which means when they try to do even simple activities, yeah, they pay for .

in terms .

of fatigue, like classroom, my patients like he go to his mail box to get the mail from the curb, come back into his house and been bed for two hours. Like that's classic post exertion blaze. And then the third is what we call brain for, which is some amount of cognitive limitation.

But that tried. That is mac fs. And so and that's always been associated with infections, things like action bar vires. But the difference now is the rate at which to occur s with pronto vias. And this Spike protein and this vaccine is so high that, like I said, just mean, in my partner alone, manage over twelve hundred patients .

and IT mostly disable. And your some debate about whether chronic fifteen cinema, psychiatric origins or physical origins, yes, I think that's .

always been in debate and that's always been a problem for that disease. That's why this very little to show for d in terms of great studies about the only thing they know about how to process disease is he telepaths to pace themselves to stay under that exertional limit that makes them sicker. And pacing is a good part of what we do. But um we've learned lots of different therapies, which makes our um kind of play easier is that we're learning so much about the path physiology of the Spike protein and what that does to the body and all of the disturbances that are causes because we know it's the spy causing in here.

So I don't have to worry that it's some psychiatric this are depression or something in the vironment like I know what is is is the bike protein learning a lot about the spy rotation? What IT does the body? And then we we choose um medicine whose formal logic mechanism, action best counteract those disturbances in path of, we have a lot of success.

But I will tell you nothing works in everybody. Um it's really a trial and error system. We use our our most frequently effective medicines first. And then I have I have second, third, fourth, fifth and things like i'm trying new things you have to do with the patients are suffering unmeasurably .

and they're tired and tired.

Foggy um can't do very much. Many of them, our house bounds to some start bedroom summer house band. Some can go off short excursions, but most of them are nowhere near living the life they used to.

So what happens to their relationships?

You know, that's a good question. I haven't seen, to be honest, a cool question because I ve thought about that myself. I've seen some destin ate people and biology. I can't tell when is there are partners of stayed with them, there are partners of support them.

I seen a lot of love and devotion, at least in my patient population, that um I kind of wonder when that's gonna, when some partners going to say you're not why married i'm not happy. Leave them in the illness, which is what you're not supposed to do in you on the marriage. But but I haven't seen that very much. But clearly their their relationship effect, the partner also suffers the partner ball game, they go on the trips they used to go on and and so they're all leading different lives. But i've seen a lot of partner support and commitment.

I mean, if you knew that your life had been completely destroyed, you couldn't work. You couldn't even go out to dinner because you were forced to take a vaccine. And no one ever apologized her, you know, stop to help you. How angry would you?

The amount of anger um is it's increment the patients that I see, they are equal parts angry. I think wrongly, they feel ashamed because they were duped, know they did something. Many of them more actually kind of reluctant because that those are the worse they really didn't want to.

They push back a little, tried not to, and then finally sick, because they are lively, who was on on the line, and then they got injured. And those are the ones who kicked them. So there's a lot of regret, shame, anger and then some of vm.

There's also a lot of court. You know they're injured, they're sick, but they're active investing injury groups. They try to share their experiences of things that have helped them. They advocate that reach out to their politicians trying to bring this more to to to common knowledge in and so um .

but they have no powers doing. They can do right? They can't sue fister.

No, not yeah.

Oh, I know someone. I have a close friend who was force secretive vaccine and has been six cents years all the time, cover IT repeatedly and all kinds of every flu. I don't is that I mean.

i'm assuming that's part of what can happen my patients. It's not so much immoral suppression. It's it's really that cfs component that I said chronic daily symptoms.

So it's it's the trial that I talked about, which is fatigue st. Exertional, these brain fog and the next analysts neuropace. So sensory neuropathy, just such high rates.

So burning tingeing pins and needles in all distributions, odd times a day, different severities. Many people are burning or none where they feel pain. What is that? It's was called a small, viBrant ability of the tiny nerve dings that infiltrate our skin and they're all they got inflamed their damage.

I think it's some of its probably atomium some of its probably from microcircuits tory problems, something called I don't want to get to science cy if you don't want to uh talker but uh it's small five and Operate is very high rates and then equally in is something called or oma or pots where uh resting heart rates or much or are like a hundred and ten were like you have these fit. People are exercise. They enjoy their resting heart right of the sixty, right when those are so fit, when we have those.

Now they're sitting in in a chair, there's ninety five, one hundred, they go walk at the batteries, one forty or they get up. Suddenly their blood pressure drops, and it's basically the small mario res that control construction of blood vessels and the controller of hearts rates are all off. And so when you try to do some activity and your blood pressure is not appropriate for the activity, the heart rates not appropriate activity, good luck doing that activity.

And that's another thing that drive this is not well, if it's severe enough, IT could be. But uh, now generally the strokes, not what causes A A lot of this function, lot of fatigue and then a whole bunch of other stuff, have skin mild manister's different G I things is the other thing. Remember, a lot of our gi system is autonomic as well, right? Parastatals gastroenterology about that.

That's all supposed to be under the controlled the and now the small fibers aren't telling you to propel the the food on your in test and or to empty the stomach. And so many even have lots of food talents. IT rams up allergies.

I see patients who can tolerate food and everything. Then the effort, vaccine, sun, they complain of immense amount of allergies to things. I can go an hour with what I see is so broad, so vast it's really it's immensely complex disease um I will say most of the time I satisfying the trek.

As I would say, the vast majority of not all of our patients get Better to some extent. Um the problem is it's the minority that we get to full get back to basic, a distinct small minority of the vast majority, modest large improvements. And then I have a cohorn which I really even after a year now having difficulty helping appreciated mean.

at what point is this end?

Well, if you look back at papers on M A C F S, uh, they say that in their lifetime only five percent ever get back to baseline. And so for most with the chronic form that I see, um it's accepting a new life and said level of functioning for people who watching us and want to learn .

more about what you're doing in more information on this, feel like they might fall into these categories.

Where would they go? So first is my organization. So F L C C C that net we have protocols. We have uh, sort of recommendations of things that we find there are helpful for treating vaccine long cover or long vex. We also have IT on treatment of various other infections, illnesses.

We even have a monograph on reperfusion drug for cancer that my partner just worked on over this past year. And so we have a lot of unbias unconvicted medical information that's come out of deep stuff. Your clinical experience.

And I think that's the first I was I I have a private practice. I couldn't treat the country, but we certainly patients in all fifty states and we do what we can. And that's starter peer corrida com.

And but that's really what we focus on is, is these two disease IT would take me ten years. And even in ten years, I don't think i'd have all the answers. But but we're learning everyday and and we're getting Better what we do every day.

The trip. Curry, thank you very much. thanks.