cover of episode Ep. 210: The First Amendment at the Supreme Court

Ep. 210: The First Amendment at the Supreme Court

2024/3/29
logo of podcast So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

Frequently requested episodes will be transcribed first

Shownotes Transcript

“I have never seen a Supreme Court term that is as consequential as this one is going to be,” said FIRE Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere, previewing) this term’s First Amendment cases. On today’s show, we analyze the oral arguments in four of those cases: NRA v. Vullo, Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v. Biden), Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC, v. Paxton. We also discuss the court’s decision in two cases involving government officials blocking their critics on social media. Joining the show are Corn-Revere, FIRE General Counsel Ronnie London, and FIRE Director of Public Advocacy Aaron Terr.

  Timestamps

  0:00 Introduction 3:29 NRA v. Vullo 26:05 Murthy v. Missouri 50:41 Netchoice cases 1:11:26 Lindke v. Freed and *O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier * 1:21:24 Outro

  Show Notes 

 

  • NRA v. Vullo* oral argument transcript) Bantam Books, Inc. et. al v Sullivan et al. (1963))
  • Murthy v. Missouri* oral argument transcript)
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC* oral argument transcript)
  • NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton* oral argument transcript) Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier decisions)  ‘So to Speak’ on Substack) Transcript)