Safety Critical C++
01:11:50 Share

Andreas Weis joins Timur and Phil. After some news about Boost, std::format and performance, Andreas talks to us about safety critical application domains, safety in C++ in general, and the difference between safety in security. ### News

• Boost libraries may drop support for older language versions)

• "Fun with printing tables with std::format and C++20" - Bartlomiej Filipek)

• "C++20 Formatting Library, Parts 1. 2 and 3" - Gajendra Gulgulia)

• "Decreasing the Number of Memory Accesses, 1/2" - Ivica Bogosavljevic)

• using std::cpp (conference in Madrid))

Links

• MUC++ (The Munich C++ User Group))

• ComicSansMs - Andreas on StackOverflow)

• The EU's Cyber Resilience Act)

• "Why not simply implement borrow checking in C++?" - Sean Baxter on Twitter)

• P2771R0 - "Towards memory safety in C++")

• "Rust Safety is not superior to C++" - Bjarne Stroustrup)

• P2739R0 - "A call to action: Think seriously about 'safety'; then do something sensible about it")

• P2759R1 - "DG Opinion on safety for ISO C++")

• P2723R1 - "Zero-initialize objects of automatic storage duration")

• D2795R0 - "Correct and incorrect code, and 'erroneous behaviour'")

• P2809R0 - "Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior")

• MISRA)