cover of episode Looking back at 2024

Looking back at 2024

2024/12/27
logo of podcast Foreign Policy Live

Foreign Policy Live

People
F
Fareed Zakaria
Topics
Fareed Zakaria: 2024年全球政治格局动荡不安,民粹主义抬头,许多国家的执政党在选举中失利。这与全球范围内的动荡、疫情后的经济影响以及人们对现有政治制度的不满有关。美国大选结果体现了这种民粹主义的持续存在,传统的共和党已经不复存在。 全球范围内,许多国家都出现了反现任政府的现象,这表明人们对现状的不满。然而,这同时也是民主制度的体现,人们可以通过选举来改变政府。与之形成对比的是,像伊朗、俄罗斯、中国和委内瑞拉等国家,由于缺乏这种机制,其政权更加脆弱。 在中东地区,美国支持以色列在加沙的军事行动付出了代价,但这在地区力量平衡中并不具有决定性意义。更重要的是以色列如何处理被占领土和巴勒斯坦人的问题。然而,以色列对黎巴嫩真主党和叙利亚的军事行动导致“抵抗轴心”大幅削弱,美国主导的地区安全秩序得到加强。中东地区的重组可能与阿拉伯之春的承诺部分实现有关,留下来的国家都拥有丰富的资源和能源独立性,但伊朗的应对方式将决定该地区未来的稳定性。 关于"混乱四重奏"(伊朗、中国、俄罗斯、朝鲜),它们的形成是美国霸权的结果,其中伊朗、朝鲜和俄罗斯是破坏稳定力量,而中国则更希望维护稳定。美国对华政策过于强硬,错失了与中国合作的机会。美国应该优先考虑自身利益,即使这意味着在政治上付出代价。 在乌克兰战争中,乌克兰在库尔斯克的攻势在士气上有所帮助,但战略上可能并非最佳选择;美国应该更迅速地提供武器支持。 金砖国家的扩张反映了世界各国对美国主导的全球秩序的不满,但其在实际权力方面的影响力有限;美国应该关注的是如何维护美元的国际地位,以及如何应对基于规则的国际秩序所面临的挑战。 Ravi Agrawal: 引导话题,提出问题,并与Fareed Zakaria进行讨论。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What were the key global conflicts and political changes in 2024?

2024 saw ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Ukraine, and Sudan, alongside a record number of elections worldwide that resulted in numerous incumbents being ousted. Key political changes included the fall of dictators in Syria and Bangladesh, and significant electoral shifts in countries like the UK, Japan, and the US.

Why did Fareed Zakaria believe the 2024 U.S. election results were predictable?

Fareed Zakaria argued that the 2024 U.S. election results were part of a broader, deeper backlash against the status quo, driven by populism, anxiety, and anger in the West. He linked this to themes in his book, 'Age of Revolutions,' which discusses societal backlashes and the rise of populist movements.

What was the global trend in incumbent governments during 2024?

In 2024, every incumbent government that faced elections suffered significant losses, a trend referred to as the 'incumbent penalty.' Examples include the British Tories' historic defeat, the LDP's loss in Japan, and the weakening of incumbents in countries like Mexico and Taiwan. India was an exception, where Modi retained power despite facing an incumbent penalty.

How did Fareed Zakaria assess the state of democracy in 2024?

Fareed Zakaria noted that while democratic institutions faced a crisis of legitimacy, democracy itself proved resilient. He highlighted that elections served as an escape valve during times of turmoil, allowing people to change governments and express dissatisfaction, which he saw as a strength of democratic systems.

What were the strategic outcomes of the Biden administration's Middle East policy in 2024?

The Biden administration's Middle East policy had mixed outcomes. While the U.S. lost soft power due to its support for Israel's war in Gaza, it achieved strategic gains by weakening Iran, Hezbollah, and the Assad regime. Israel emerged as the dominant military power in the region, and the American-led security order was strengthened.

What was the significance of Israel's northern strategy in 2024?

Israel's northern strategy, which targeted Hezbollah and Iran's proxies, was highly successful. It destroyed Hezbollah's command structure, weapons caches, and Iran's air defenses, leading to the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria. This significantly weakened the 'axis of resistance' and reordered the Middle East in favor of Israel and the U.S.

How did Fareed Zakaria view the relationship between the U.S. and China in 2024?

Fareed Zakaria criticized the Biden administration's early confrontational approach toward China, particularly the Anchorage meeting, which he saw as unnecessarily antagonistic. He argued that a more cooperative approach could have better aligned with China's economic interests and prevented the deepening of the Russia-China alliance.

What was the impact of the BRICS expansion in 2024?

The expansion of BRICS to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE in 2024 signaled growing dissatisfaction with U.S. dominance in the global order. However, Zakaria dismissed the bloc's potential for significant hard power, comparing it to the ineffective non-aligned movement of the 1970s.

What were the key challenges for Ukraine in 2024?

Ukraine faced significant challenges in 2024, including Russia's overwhelming size and economic advantage. While Ukraine's morale was boosted by offensives like the Kursk operation, Zakaria noted that the country struggled with delayed arms deliveries from the U.S. and Europe, which hindered its ability to counter Russian aggression effectively.

How did Fareed Zakaria assess the global balance of power in 2024?

Fareed Zakaria observed that the global balance of power was shifting, with challenges to the U.S.-led order from Russia, China, and Iran. While the U.S. achieved strategic gains in the Middle East, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and China's economic influence in Asia and Latin America posed significant threats to the rules-based international system.

Chapters
Fareed Zakaria, author of *Age of Revolutions*, discusses the 2024 US election results in the context of global populism and anti-incumbency trends. He highlights the global trend of incumbent governments facing defeat and explores the implications for democracy.
  • Rise of populism and anti-incumbency trends globally
  • Trump's win not a fluke, but part of a broader backlash
  • Old Republican Party is gone, replaced by populist MAGA party

Shownotes Transcript

This year closed out with ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Ukraine, and Sudan, and numerous incumbents forced out after a record year of elections around the world. Fareed Zakaria, author of Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present, joins FP Live to reflect on the year and share his insights on what these trends could mean for our liberal global world order. Zakaria is also the host of CNN’s* Fareed Zakaria GPS*.

Suggested reading (FP links are paywall-free): 

Transcript: The End of Left Versus Right)

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)