TL;DR: I'm presenting three recent papers which all share a similar finding, i.e. the safety training techniques for chat models don’t transfer well from chat models to the agents built from them. In other words, models won’t tell you how to do something harmful, but they are often willing to directly execute harmful actions. However, all papers find that different attack methods like jailbreaks, prompt-engineering, or refusal-vector ablation do transfer.Here are the three papers:
AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents
Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents
Applying Refusal-Vector Ablation to Llama 3.1 70B Agents
** What are language model agents**Language model agents are a combination of a language model and a scaffolding software. Regular language models are typically limited to being chat bots, i.e. they receive messages and reply to them. However, scaffolding gives these models access to tools which they can [...] ---Outline:(00:55) What are language model agents(01:36) Overview(03:31) AgentHarm Benchmark(05:27) Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken as Browser Agents(06:47) Applying Refusal-Vector Ablation to Llama 3.1 70B Agents(08:23) Discussion--- First published: November 3rd, 2024 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZoFxTqWRBkyanonyb/current-safety-training-techniques-do-not-fully-transfer-to) --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO). ---Images from the article:)Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts), or another podcast app.
