cover of episode Mind the Gap: a historically polarized US election

Mind the Gap: a historically polarized US election

2024/9/30
logo of podcast Eye On The Market

Eye On The Market

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
M
Michael Sembelist
Topics
Michael Sembelist: 2024年美国总统大选是至少百年来最两极分化的选举,候选人的意识形态立场极端,这体现在哈里斯和特朗普的政策主张上。哈里斯的财政政策计划相对更“负责任”,侧重于对富人和大型企业的增税,以资助社会福利项目和中低收入人群的减税。然而,提高公司税率可能导致公司将业务迁出美国。特朗普的财政政策计划变化无常,其提出的10%普遍关税的收入预测存在很大不确定性,其减税计划将大幅增加赤字和债务。两位候选人的财政计划都将恶化美国的赤字和债务状况,并提前美国债务危机来临的时间。 在贸易方面,美国两党对对华征收关税的立场出奇一致。中国是世界上最重商主义的国家,加入WTO后加剧了美国制造业的就业损失。 在能源方面,拜登政府的能源政策并非完全反对石油和天然气,而是更侧重于可再生能源的补贴,向可再生能源的转型将非常昂贵,美国电力价格正在上涨。哈里斯似乎改变了她对水力压裂法的立场。 在移民问题上,移民问题对投资者来说是一把双刃剑,既能增加劳动力供应,也能带来预算压力。 在抑制物价上涨方面,哈里斯的计划在经济上站不住脚,但在政治上可能有效。 在北约问题上,特朗普关于北约的言论令人担忧,但许多北约成员国没有履行其国防开支承诺。 在监管方面,拜登政府创下了经济上具有重大意义的法规数量的新纪录,但最高法院的几项裁决将改变监管环境,无论谁当选总统。 总而言之,分裂的政府对投资者来说影响最小,而一方完全执政则可能导致市场波动。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is the 2024 US Presidential election considered the most polarized in 100 years?

The 2024 election is considered the most polarized in 100 years due to the extreme ideological positions of the candidates. Kamala Harris is the sixth most liberal/progressive candidate since World War II, while Donald Trump’s primary supporters, like Senator Vance, represent the sixth most conservative positions. This polarization is reflected in their policy proposals and the unprecedented ideological swing expected regardless of the election outcome.

What are the key fiscal policy differences between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump?

Kamala Harris proposes a redistributionist fiscal policy, including $1.3 trillion in taxes on the wealthy and $2.8 trillion on corporations over 10 years, with a net negative impact of $1 trillion on the deficit. Trump’s fiscal plan, which includes extending individual and business tax cuts, eliminating Social Security taxation, and repealing the SALT cap, is estimated to have a deficit impact three to four times worse than Harris’s plan.

How does the China stimulus package differ from previous efforts?

The China stimulus package is seen as a potential turning point because it includes measures like a loan guarantee program for state-owned enterprises to buy vacant homes for social housing. This approach is more receptive to domestic and foreign investor concerns, unlike previous stimulus efforts that often led to anti-market policies and capital destruction. The market reaction has been positive, with significant increases in Chinese equities.

What are the implications of Trump’s proposed 10% universal tariff?

Trump’s proposed 10% universal tariff is estimated to raise around $2 trillion in revenue, but this figure is highly uncertain due to assumptions about import elasticity, tariff burden sharing, and potential retaliation. The tariff could also harm US firms, as seen in previous tariff implementations where subsidies were required to offset losses. The proposal reflects a broader consensus in Washington to roll back globalization, particularly against China.

How does immigration impact the US economy and investors?

Immigration increases the labor supply, reducing pressure on the Federal Reserve to tighten policy rates and supporting workforce growth amid low US birth rates. However, unmanaged immigration, such as the surge in undocumented border crossings to over 3 million in 2023, creates budgetary pressures on cities like Denver, Chicago, and New York, leading to offsetting budget cuts. Well-managed immigration is beneficial, but poorly managed immigration has negative economic impacts.

What are the key regulatory changes expected from the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court is expected to make four major decisions that could significantly roll back the regulatory state. These include ending Chevron deference, expanding the major questions doctrine, and changing the statute of limitations for challenging federal regulations. These changes would reduce automatic deference to government agencies and require clearer congressional authorization for significant agency actions, impacting the regulatory landscape regardless of the election outcome.

Why is China’s economic situation prompting a stimulus package?

China’s economic situation is dire, with money supply growth cratering, foreign direct investment fleeing, PMIs slowing, and residential floor space starts dropping to 2008 levels. Consumer confidence is low, and commercial property prices are falling. These factors, combined with poor equity performance, have pressured China to act, leading to the stimulus package aimed at stabilizing the economy and markets.

What are the potential outcomes of the 2024 US election for investors?

The most likely outcome of the 2024 election is a split government, which tends to have the least negative implications for investors. However, a GOP or Democratic sweep could lead to market caution and profit-taking as investors wait to see the policy outcomes. Harris’s mention of eliminating the filibuster for Roe v. Wade raises concerns about broader legislative changes, adding uncertainty to the market.

Chapters
This chapter analyzes the unprecedented polarization in the 2024 US Presidential election, comparing it to past elections using data from voting records and ideology rankings. It highlights the extreme ideological positions of the candidates and the implications for investors.
  • 2024 election is the most polarized in at least 100 years.
  • Harris is the sixth most liberal candidate since WWII.
  • Trump 2024's supporters are among the most conservative.
  • Many of Trump's former cabinet members have repudiated his candidacy.

Shownotes Transcript

Candidate policy comparisons in a historically polarized US Election; China stimulus package

The US is about to conduct its most polarized Presidential election in 100 years. Today’s note looks at candidate policy differences and implications for investors: government spending, taxation, tariffs, trade, immigration, regulation, NATO, energy, price controls and the Electoral College. We conclude with analysis of the China stimulus package, which might have a better chance of succeeding than recent failed efforts.